Follow-up survey of general practitioners' perceptions of UK allergy services

被引:15
|
作者
Hazeldine, Michael [1 ]
Worth, Allison [1 ]
Levy, Mark L. [1 ]
Sheikh, Aziz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Allergy & Resp Res Grp, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL | 2010年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
allergy; primary care; service provision; questionnaire survey; GPs;
D O I
10.4104/pcrj.2010.00002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: A UK survey of general practitioners (GPs) in 2002 found that they perceived allergy care throughout the UK National Health Service (NHS) to be poor. We conducted a follow-up survey in 2009 to see if GPs' perceptions had changed. Objectives: To determine GP perceptions of allergy care in the NHS in the wake of recent Government reports into allergy care, and to compare the findings of this survey to a similar survey conducted in 2002. Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey of 500 UK GPs was conducted, using an adapted version of the 2002 questionnaire, modified to reflect recent developments in primary care. Results: We obtained valid responses from 149 GPs, 87% of whom were based in England. 74% were GP principals and 63% worked in training practices. Most GPs (71%; 95%CI 63-79) rated overall NHS allergy care as poor, expressing concern about both primary care and access to allergy specialists. There were no significant differences in GPs' perceptions of the quality of allergy care provided in primary (p=0.33) and secondary care (p=0.97) or access to specialists (p=0.37), between 2002 and 2009. Conclusion: This survey suggests that recent professional and parliamentary reviews have not led to any notable improvements in GP perceptions of UK NHS allergy services between 2002 and 2009. (C) 2010 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK. All rights reserved. M Hazeldine et al. Prim Care Resp J 2010; 19(1): 84-86. doi:10.4104/pcrj.2010.00002
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 86
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Direct new oral anticoagulants: follow-up, guidelines and bleeding complications in general practice-a survey of Swiss general internal medicine practitioners
    Sauter, Thomas C.
    Melis, Carlo
    Hautz, Wolf E.
    Ricklin, Meret E.
    Exadaktylos, Aristomenis K.
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [32] Access to dental services for people with a physical disability: a survey of general dental practitioners in Leicestershire, UK
    Baird, W. O.
    McGrother, C.
    Abrams, K. R.
    Dugmore, C.
    Jackson, R. J.
    COMMUNITY DENTAL HEALTH, 2008, 25 (04) : 248 - 252
  • [33] FOLLOW-UP SURVEY OF ARTHRITIS
    不详
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1977, 6 (02) : 75 - 76
  • [34] FOLLOW-UP OF GENERAL PRACTITIONER REFERRALS IN CIVIL SERVICE HEALTH SURVEY
    CHRISTIE, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE & SOCIAL MEDICINE, 1971, 25 (01): : 55 - &
  • [35] FOLLOW-UP SURVEY BY MAIL
    SCHAEFER, C
    SOCIAL WORK, 1976, 21 (04) : 327 - 328
  • [36] Short term follow-up of 198 IV heroin users by motivated General Practitioners
    Charpak, Y
    NoryGuillou, F
    Blin, P
    Monaque, C
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 1997, 45 (01): : 13 - 22
  • [37] Follow-Up of the Wheat Allergy in Children; Consequences and Outgrowing the Allergy
    Mansouri, Mahboubeh
    Pourpak, Zahra
    Mozafari, Habibeh
    Gorji, Fatemeh Abdollah
    Shoormasti, Raheleh Shokouhi
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ALLERGY ASTHMA AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 11 (02) : 157 - 163
  • [38] UK Paediatric Allergy Services Survey-Results
    Wells, Rosy
    McKay, Cathy
    Makwana, Nick
    Vyas, Deepan
    Perkin, Michael
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2021, 51 (01): : 166 - 166
  • [39] Follow-up survey of general practitioners in Zhejiang Province post-completion of position transition training in 2017-2020
    Qin, Hongli
    Li, Shuai
    Liu, Juanjuan
    Ren, Jingjing
    Yu, Meiyue
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [40] Competency assessments: Perceptions at follow-up
    Carlin, K
    Silberfeld, M
    Deber, RB
    Lowy, F
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1996, 41 (03): : 167 - 174