Post-Separation Parenting Time Schedules in Joint Physical Custody Arrangements

被引:18
|
作者
Steinbach, Anja [1 ]
Augustijn, Lara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Sociol, Lotharstr 65, D-47057 Duisburg, Germany
关键词
divorce; FAMOD; Germany; joint physical custody; parenting time schedules; separation; CHILDRENS LIVING ARRANGEMENTS; SHARED RESIDENCE; EVERYDAY LIFE; PATTERNS; CONTACT; ADJUSTMENT; ATTACHMENT; DIVORCE; FATHERS; INCOME;
D O I
10.1111/jomf.12746
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of the study was to examine patterns of parenting time schedules in joint physical custody (JPC) arrangements. Background: Although the importance of contact with the non-residential parent for children's well-being after family dissolution is well-documented, the measures used in surveys are often crude and do not capture the two dimensions of post-separation parenting time schedules: the proportion of time children spend with each parent and the number of transitions children make between parental homes. Method: The analyses are based on the Family Models in Germany study, a German sample of families with children aged 0-14 that was conducted in 2019. As this study includes a residential calendar capturing the children's stays with each parent over 4 weeks, it was possible to calculate both dimensions of post-separation parenting time schedules for 463 JPC families. Results: The results revealed that 55.5% of JPC families practiced an asymmetric (at least 30% with one parent) and 44.5% practiced a symmetric care arrangement (50% with each parent). The mean number of transitions children experienced was 9.5 within a month. The factors that were found to be positively associated with practicing symmetric JPC were working hours of the responding parent and parents' relationship quality. However, working hours of the responding parent and the distance between the parents' homes reduced the number of transitions between the parents' homes, whereas a good parental relationship increased them. Conclusion: Empirical investigations of children in post-separation families should take the two dimensions of physical custody into account.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 607
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Systematic review and theoretical comparison of children's outcomes in post-separation living arrangements
    Vowels, Laura
    Comolli, Chiara
    Bernardi, Laura
    Chacon-Mendoza, Daniela
    Darwiche, Joelle
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06):
  • [32] Family Court Judges' Decisions Regarding Post-Separation Care Arrangements for Young Children
    Woodhead, Yvonne
    Cameron, Dianne
    Blackwell, Suzanne
    Seymour, Frederick W.
    PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2015, 22 (04) : 520 - 534
  • [33] Post-separation parenting apps in the hands of family law practitioners: expectations versus experience
    Irving, Michelle A.
    Heard, Genevieve
    Smyth, Bruce M.
    Payne, Jason L.
    Althor, Glenn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW POLICY AND THE FAMILY, 2023, 37 (01)
  • [34] Intervening in post-separation parenting disputes: Reflections on past, present and future principles and processes
    Moloney, Lawrie
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY STUDIES, 2013, 19 (03) : 218 - 223
  • [35] Self-esteem in children in joint physical custody and other living arrangements
    Turunen, J.
    Fransson, E.
    Bergstrom, M.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 149 : 106 - 112
  • [36] Are we in this Together? Post-Separation Co-Parenting of Fathers with and without a History of Domestic Violence
    Thompson-Walsh, Catherine A.
    Scott, Katreena L.
    Dyson, Amanda
    Lishak, Victoria
    CHILD ABUSE REVIEW, 2018, 27 (02) : 137 - 149
  • [37] Post-Separation Parenting Apps in the Context of Family Violence: Harm Minimisation versus Harm Facilitation
    Irving, Michelle
    LAW TECHNOLOGY AND HUMANS, 2024, 6 (01): : 59 - 74
  • [38] The effect of physical contact between dairy cows and calves during separation on their post-separation behavioural response
    Johnsen, Julie Foske
    Ellingsen, Kristian
    Grondahl, Ann Margaret
    Boe, Knut Egil
    Lidfors, Lena
    Mejdell, Cecilie Marie
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2015, 166 : 11 - 19
  • [39] Is joint physical custody in the best interests of the child? Parent-child relationships and custodial arrangements
    Bastaits, Kim
    Pasteels, Inge
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2019, 36 (11-12) : 3752 - 3772
  • [40] Risks and benefits of post-separation parenting apps: perceptions of family law professionals in Australia and New Zealand
    Heard, Genevieve M.
    Irving, Michelle A.
    Smyth, Bruce M.
    Payne, Jason L.
    Althor, Glenn
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2023, 45 (02) : 143 - 164