A cost analysis of alfentanil plus propofol vs morphine plus midazolam for the sedation of critically ill patients

被引:15
|
作者
Manley, NM [1 ]
Fitzpatrick, RW [1 ]
Long, T [1 ]
Jones, PW [1 ]
机构
[1] N STAFFORDSHIRE NHS TRUST,DEPT PHARM,STOKE ON TRENT,STAFFS,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199712020-00015
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Morphine + midazolam and alfentanil + propofol are regimens offering well tolerated and effective sedation for critically ill patients. However, morphine + midazolam is associated with accumulation in these patients, resulting in prolonged recovery characteristics. Alfentanil + propofol, although more expensive, has a shorter elimination half-life, is not associated with accumulation problems and results in a rapid recovery. This study compared sedation quality, patient recovery characteristics and the cost of alfentanil + propofol and morphine + midazolam for sedating critically ill patients in the intensive care setting. 26 patients were randomly allocated to receive sedation with alfentanil + propofol (n = 17) or morphine + midazolam (n = 9). Outcome measures were the times until extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and final hospital discharge. Cost analysis assessed both drug-related costs, including drug acquisition and administration, and non-drug-related costs, including bed occupancy. Age, gender, diagnosis, Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores and sedation quality did not differ significantly between groups. The times to extubation and until patients were fit for transfer from ICU were significantly shorter for patients sedated with alfentanil + propofol than for those sedated with morphine + midazolam. The total costs (at the time of the study pound 1 was equivalent to $US 1.59) for ICU hospital stay per patient for alfentanil + propofol and morphine + midazolam were pound 3063 and pound 9511, respectively, because the shorter recovery characteristics of alfentanil + propofol led to a reduction in ICU stay. Corresponding costs for total hospital stay were pound 6063 and pound 13 735, respectively. In conclusion, alfentanil. + propofol has a better pharmacoeconomic profile than morphine + midazolam for sedating critically ill patients in the ICU setting.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 255
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NICOM vs LiDCO™ plus during changes in cardiac output in critically ill patients
    M Cecconi
    G Monti
    S Vesconi
    M Hamilton
    M Grounds
    A Rhodes
    [J]. Critical Care, 14 (Suppl 1):
  • [42] DO INFUSIONS OF MIDAZOLAM AND PROPOFOL POSE AN INFECTION RISK TO CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    FARRINGTON, M
    MCGINNES, J
    MATTHEWS, I
    PARK, GR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (04) : 415 - 417
  • [43] CONTINUOUS-INFUSION SEDATION LORAZEPAM VERSUS MIDAZOLAM IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    Ammar, Mahmoud
    Ammar, Abdalla
    Owusu, Kent
    Siner, Jonathan
    Chess, Adam
    Johnson, Jennifer
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [44] A lack of evidence of superiority of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients:: A qualitative and quantitative systematic review
    Walder, B
    Elia, N
    Henzi, I
    Romand, JR
    Tramèr, MR
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (04): : 975 - 983
  • [45] Patients Prefer Propofol to Midazolam Plus Fentanyl for Sedation for Colonoscopy: Results of a Single-Center Randomized Equivalence Trial
    Schroeder, Caleb
    Kaoutzanis, Christodoulos
    Tocco-Bradley, Rosalie
    Obear, Janet
    Welch, Kathleen B.
    Winter, Suzanne
    Cleary, Robert K.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (01) : 62 - 69
  • [46] Safety and Efficacy of Deep Sedation for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Propofol Versus Propofol Plus Midazolam, Randomized Prospective Study
    Kim, Kyoung-Oh
    Huh, Kyung Rim
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Hahn, Taeho
    Park, Sang Hoon
    Yoo, Kyo-Sang
    Kim, Jong Hyeok
    Park, Choong Kee
    Lee, Kyung-Hun
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB228 - AB228
  • [47] Propofol sedation substantially increases the caloric and lipid intake in critically ill patients
    Charriere, Melanie
    Ridley, Emma
    Hastings, Jennifer
    Bianchet, Oliver
    Scheinkestel, Carlos
    Berger, Mette M.
    [J]. NUTRITION, 2017, 42 : 64 - 68
  • [48] Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Critically Ill Patients: How Much Is Too Much?
    Burry, Lisa
    De Jong, Audrey
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207 (07) : 806 - 807
  • [49] Dexmedetomidine versus propofol for prolonged sedation in critically ill trauma and surgical patients
    Winings, Natalie A.
    Daley, Brian J.
    Bollig, Reagan W.
    Roberts, R. Frank, Jr.
    Radtke, Jennifer
    Heidel, R. Eric
    Taylor, Jessica E.
    McMillen, James C.
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2021, 19 (03): : 129 - 134
  • [50] Continuous infusions of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for sedation of the critically ill surgery trauma patient: A prospective, randomized comparison
    McCollam, JS
    O'Neil, MG
    Norcross, ED
    Byrne, TK
    Reeves, ST
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (11) : 2454 - 2458