Dosimetric consequences of the shift towards computed tomography guided target definition and planning for breast conserving radiotherapy

被引:22
|
作者
van der Laan, Hans Paul [1 ]
Dolsma, Wil V. [1 ]
Maduro, John H. [1 ]
Korevaar, Erik W. [1 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-3-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The shift from conventional two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D)conformal target definition and dose-planning seems to have introduced volumetric as well as geometric changes. The purpose of this study was to compare coverage of computed tomography (CT)-based breast and boost planning target volumes (PTV), absolute volumes irradiated, and dose delivered to the organs at risk with conventional 2D and 3D-conformal breast conserving radiotherapy. Methods: Twenty-five patients with left-sided breast cancer were subject of CT-guided target definition and 3D-conformal dose-planning, and conventionally defined target volumes and treatment plans were reconstructed on the planning CT. Accumulated dose-distributions were calculated for the conventional and 3D-conformal dose-plans, taking into account a prescribed dose of 50 Gy for the breast plans and 16 Gy for the boost plans. Results: With conventional treatment plans, CT-based breast and boost PTVs received the intended dose in 78% and 32% of the patients, respectively, and smaller volumes received the prescribed breast and boost doses compared with 3D-conformal dose-planning. The mean lung dose, the volume of the lungs receiving > 20 Gy, the mean heart dose, and volume of the heart receiving > 30 Gy were significantly less with conventional treatment plans. Specific areas within the breast and boost PTVs systematically received a lower than intended dose with conventional treatment plans. Conclusion: The shift towards CT-guided target definition and planning as the golden standard for breast conserving radiotherapy has resulted in improved target coverage at the cost of larger irradiated volumes and an increased dose delivered to organs at risk. Tissue is now included into the breast and boost target volumes that was never explicitly defined or included with conventional treatment. Therefore, a coherent definition of the breast and boost target volumes is needed, based on clinical data confirming tumour control probability and normal tissue complication probability with the use of 3D-conformal radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of tissue computed tomography number changes and dosimetric shifts after conventionally fractionated irradiation in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery
    Lee, D. S.
    Lee, Y. K.
    Kim, J. S.
    Lee, J.
    Kim, Y. S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [32] Dosimetric impact of target definition in brachytherapy for cervical cancer-Computed tomography and trans rectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging
    Swamidas, Jamema
    Jain, Jeevanshu
    Nesvacil, Nicole
    Tanderup, Kari
    Kirisits, Christian
    Schmid, Max
    Agarwal, Priyanka
    Joshi, Kishore
    Naga, Pushpa
    Khadanga, Chira Ranjan
    Gudi, Shivakumar
    Gurram, Lavanya
    Chopra, Supriya
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 126 - 133
  • [33] The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis
    Hirose, Katsumi
    Sato, Mariko
    Hatayama, Yoshiomi
    Kawaguchi, Hideo
    Komai, Fumio
    Sohma, Makoto
    Obara, Hideki
    Suzuki, Masashi
    Tanaka, Mitsuki
    Fujioka, Ichitaro
    Ichise, Koji
    Takai, Yoshihiro
    Aoki, Masahiko
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13
  • [34] The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis
    Katsumi Hirose
    Mariko Sato
    Yoshiomi Hatayama
    Hideo Kawaguchi
    Fumio Komai
    Makoto Sohma
    Hideki Obara
    Masashi Suzuki
    Mitsuki Tanaka
    Ichitaro Fujioka
    Koji Ichise
    Yoshihiro Takai
    Masahiko Aoki
    Radiation Oncology, 13
  • [35] Target volume motion during anal cancer image guided radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography
    Brooks, Corrinne J.
    Bernier, Laurence
    Hansen, Vibeke N.
    Tait, Diana M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1085):
  • [36] Cone beam computed tomography guided treatment delivery and planning verification for magnetic resonance imaging only radiotherapy of the brain
    Edmund, Jens M.
    Andreasen, Daniel
    Mahmood, Faisal
    Van Leemput, Koen
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (09) : 1496 - 1500
  • [37] Reconstitution of internal target volumes by combining four-dimensional computed tomography and a modified slow computed tomography scan in stereotactic body radiotherapy planning for lung cancer
    Seong Soon Jang
    Gil Ja Huh
    Suk Young Park
    Po Song Yang
    Hae Nam Chung
    Jae Hyuk Seo
    Ji Chan Park
    Young Jun Yang
    Eun Youn Cho
    Radiation Oncology, 9
  • [38] Reconstitution of internal target volumes by combining four-dimensional computed tomography and a modified slow computed tomography scan in stereotactic body radiotherapy planning for lung cancer
    Jang, Seong Soon
    Huh, Gil Ja
    Park, Suk Young
    Yang, Po Song
    Chung, Hae Nam
    Seo, Jae Hyuk
    Park, Ji Chan
    Yang, Young Jun
    Cho, Eun Youn
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
  • [39] Quantitative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in target volume definition for offline image guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer
    Wang, W.
    Wu, Q.
    Yan, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S550 - S551
  • [40] Positioning error and expanding margins of planning target volume with kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography for prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Wang, Gang
    Wang, Wen-Ling
    Liu, Yi-Qun
    Dong, Hong-Min
    Hu, Yin-Xiang
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2018, 11 : 1981 - 1988