Driving and hindering factors for rural electrification in developing countries: Lessons from Bangladesh

被引:39
|
作者
Rahman, Md Mizanur [1 ,3 ]
Paatero, Jukka V. [1 ]
Poudyal, Aditya [2 ]
Lahdelma, Risto [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Sch Engn, Dept Energy Technol, FI-0076 Espoo, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Sch Sci, Dept Appl Phys, FI-0076 Aalto, Finland
[3] REB, Dhaka 1344, Bangladesh
关键词
Rural electrification; Hindering factors; Master planning; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DETERMINANTS; ELECTRICITY; ASIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.100
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Rural electrification is essential for bringing about social and economic developments, but the progress is distressingly slow in most developing countries. The Bangladesh Rural Electrification Program (BREP) has been highlighted as a positive case among developing countries, but from 2006 onwards there have been doubts about the program's chances of success. In this paper, we examine the rural electrification practices in Bangladesh and evaluate the claim that, whereas they were successful up to 2005, they then began to decline in terms of their performance. This study determines the factors behind the initial success of the program as well as those that account for the recent downturn in BREP. We found that the BREP was a clear success in terms of its growth and progress; however, its performance has been declining since 2006. The key driving factors for the success of this program had to do with prioritizing system investment, community involvement, anti-corruption features, standardized practices and performance-based incentives while excluding political parties. The major issues accounting for the decline were the lack of organizational autonomy, a shortage of funding, unrealistic tariffs, and power supply shortages. Renewable-based, off-grid technologies have been successfully supplementing the on-grid program in remote areas. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 851
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Model-based scenarios for rural electrification in developing countries
    van Ruijven, Bas J.
    Schers, Jules
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    ENERGY, 2012, 38 (01) : 386 - 397
  • [12] Sustainability of telecentres in developing countries: Lessons from Union Digital Centre in Bangladesh
    Faroqi, Md Gofran
    Siddiquee, Noore Alam
    Ullah, Shahid
    TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2019, 37 : 113 - 127
  • [13] Rural-urban migration in developing countries: Lessons from the literature
    Selod, Harris
    Shilpi, Forhad
    REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 91
  • [14] RURAL BANKING IN NIGERIA - LESSONS FROM OTHER DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES
    OKORIE, A
    AGRICULTURAL ADMINISTRATION AND EXTENSION, 1988, 28 (02): : 147 - 159
  • [15] Sustainable rural electrification planning in developing countries: A Chock for proposal for electrification of isolated communities of Venezuela
    Lopez-Gonzalez, A.
    Ferrer-Marti, L.
    Domenech, B.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 327 - 338
  • [16] Initiative for 100% rural electrification in developing countries: Case study of Senegal
    Diouf, Boucar
    Pode, Ramchandra
    Osei, Rita
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 59 : 926 - 930
  • [17] Evaluation of choices for sustainable rural electrification in developing countries: A multicriteria approach
    Rahman, Md. Mizanur
    Paatero, Jukka V.
    Lahdelma, Risto
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 59 : 589 - 599
  • [18] Sustainability of Rural Electrification Projects in Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
    Cuenca-Enrique, Carlos
    del-Río-Carazo, Laura
    Acquila-Natale, Emiliano
    Iglesias-Pradas, Santiago
    Energies, 2024, 17 (23)
  • [19] EVALUATION OF GRID CONNECTED RURAL ELECTRIFICATION PROJECTS IN DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES
    SIYAMBALAPITIYA, DJT
    RAJAPAKSE, STK
    DEMEL, SJS
    FERNANDO, SIT
    PERERA, BLPP
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1991, 6 (01) : 332 - 338
  • [20] Analysis of electrification strategies for rural renewable electrification in developing countries using agent-based models
    Alfaro J.F.
    Miller S.A.
    Energy for Sustainable Development, 2021, 61 : 89 - 103