Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:77
|
作者
Umbehr, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Bachmann, Lucas M. [1 ]
Held, Ulrike [1 ]
Kessler, Thomas M. [1 ]
Sulser, Tullio [2 ]
Weishaupt, Dominik [3 ]
Kurhanewicz, John [4 ]
Steurer, Johann [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Horten Ctr Patient Oriented Res & Knowledge Trans, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Urol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; MR imaging and MR spectroscopy imaging; Diagnosis; INITIAL CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; H-1 MR SPECTROSCOPY; PERIPHERAL ZONE; ENDORECTAL MRI; SEXTANT LOCALIZATION; ANTIGEN LEVELS; BIOPSY; ACCURACY; LEVEL; COIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) emerged as a promising test in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and showed encouraging results. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to meta-analyse the diagnostic accuracy of combined MRI/MRSI in prostate cancer and to explore risk profiles with highest benefit. Evidence acquisition: The authors searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Library, and the authors screened reference lists and contacted experts. There were no language restrictions. The last search was performed in August 2008. Evidence synthesis: We identified 31 test-accuracy studies (1765 patients); 16 studies (17 populations) with a total of 581 patients were suitable for meta-analysis. Nine combined MRI/MRSI studies (10 populations) examining men with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer (297 patients; 1518 specimens) had a pooled sensitivity and specificity on prostate subpart level of 68% (95% CI, 56-78%) and 85% (9S% CI, 78-90%), respectively. Compared with patients at high risk for clinically relevant cancer (six studies), sensitivity was lower in low-risk patients (four studies) (58% [46-69%] vs 74% [58-85%]; p > 0.05) but higher for specificity (91% [86-94%] vs 78% [70-84%]; p < 0.01). Seven studies examining patients with suspected prostate cancer at combined MRI/MRSI (284 patients) had an overall pooled sensitivity and specificity on patients level of 82% (59-94%) and 88% (80-95%). In the low-risk group (five studies) these values were 75% (39-93%) and 91% (77-97%), respectively. Conclusions: A limited number of small studies suggest that MRI combined with MRSI could be a rule-in test for low-risk patients. This finding needs further confirmation in larger studies and cost-effectiveness needs to be established. (C) 2008 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 591
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Shim, Ju Hyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lee, Seung Soo
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Choi, Joon-Il
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [32] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Stabile, Armando
    Neves, Joana B.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shanmugabavan, Yaalini
    Clement, Keiran D.
    Sarkar, Debashis
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Thurtle, David
    Deeks, Jonathan
    Emberton, Mark
    Takwoingi, Yemisi
    Moore, Caroline M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (03) : 284 - 303
  • [33] Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Morris, Zoe
    Whiteley, William N.
    Longstreth, W. T., Jr.
    Weber, Frank
    Lee, Yi-Chung
    Tsushima, Yoshito
    Alphs, Hannah
    Ladd, Susanne C.
    Warlow, Charles
    Wardlaw, Joanna M.
    Salman, Rustam Al-Shahi
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 339 : 547 - 550
  • [34] The human amygdala: a systematic review and meta-analysis of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging
    Brierley, B
    Shaw, P
    David, AS
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2002, 39 (01) : 84 - 105
  • [35] Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-radiomics in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Linyong
    Li, Songhua
    Li, Shaofeng
    Lin, Yan
    Wei, Dayou
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [36] Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in epilepsy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Englman, Cameron
    Malpas, Charles B.
    Harvey, A. Simon
    Maixner, Wirginia J.
    Yang, Joseph Yuan-Mou
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 91 : 1 - 8
  • [37] Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Lu
    Tan, Yuchuan
    Dan, Hanli
    Hu, Lin
    Zhang, Jiuquan
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (09) : 1238 - 1247
  • [38] Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Eisen, Andrea
    Fletcher, Glenn G.
    Fienberg, Samantha
    George, Ralph
    Holloway, Claire
    Kulkarni, Supriya
    Seely, Jean M.
    Muradali, Derek
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2024, 75 (01): : 118 - 135
  • [39] Relationship of prostate cancer topography and tumour conspicuity on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Satish, Pranav
    Freeman, Alex
    Kelly, Daniel
    Kirkham, Alex
    Orczyk, Clement
    Simpson, Benjamin S.
    Giganti, Francesco
    Whitaker, Hayley C.
    Emberton, Mark
    Norris, Joseph M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [40] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Informed Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy Naive Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Ahmad, Ardalan E.
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Klotz, Laurence
    Emberton, Mark
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Arora, Karan
    Fleshner, Neil
    Finelli, Antonio
    Perlis, Nathan
    Tyson, Mark D.
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (06): : 1085 - 1092