Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:77
|
作者
Umbehr, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Bachmann, Lucas M. [1 ]
Held, Ulrike [1 ]
Kessler, Thomas M. [1 ]
Sulser, Tullio [2 ]
Weishaupt, Dominik [3 ]
Kurhanewicz, John [4 ]
Steurer, Johann [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Horten Ctr Patient Oriented Res & Knowledge Trans, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Urol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Prostate cancer; MR imaging and MR spectroscopy imaging; Diagnosis; INITIAL CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; H-1 MR SPECTROSCOPY; PERIPHERAL ZONE; ENDORECTAL MRI; SEXTANT LOCALIZATION; ANTIGEN LEVELS; BIOPSY; ACCURACY; LEVEL; COIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2008.10.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) emerged as a promising test in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and showed encouraging results. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to meta-analyse the diagnostic accuracy of combined MRI/MRSI in prostate cancer and to explore risk profiles with highest benefit. Evidence acquisition: The authors searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Library, and the authors screened reference lists and contacted experts. There were no language restrictions. The last search was performed in August 2008. Evidence synthesis: We identified 31 test-accuracy studies (1765 patients); 16 studies (17 populations) with a total of 581 patients were suitable for meta-analysis. Nine combined MRI/MRSI studies (10 populations) examining men with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer (297 patients; 1518 specimens) had a pooled sensitivity and specificity on prostate subpart level of 68% (95% CI, 56-78%) and 85% (9S% CI, 78-90%), respectively. Compared with patients at high risk for clinically relevant cancer (six studies), sensitivity was lower in low-risk patients (four studies) (58% [46-69%] vs 74% [58-85%]; p > 0.05) but higher for specificity (91% [86-94%] vs 78% [70-84%]; p < 0.01). Seven studies examining patients with suspected prostate cancer at combined MRI/MRSI (284 patients) had an overall pooled sensitivity and specificity on patients level of 82% (59-94%) and 88% (80-95%). In the low-risk group (five studies) these values were 75% (39-93%) and 91% (77-97%), respectively. Conclusions: A limited number of small studies suggest that MRI combined with MRSI could be a rule-in test for low-risk patients. This finding needs further confirmation in larger studies and cost-effectiveness needs to be established. (C) 2008 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 591
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in diagnosis of suspicious prostate cancer A meta-analysis
    Cai, Weiguo
    Zhu, Dongyong
    Byanju, Sama
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Hanfei
    Wang, Yanfang
    Liao, Meiyan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (14)
  • [2] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Drost, Frank-Jan H.
    Osses, Daniel
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (01) : 78 - 94
  • [3] Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang Zhen
    Xiaoqiang Liu
    Chen Yegang
    Yang Yongjiao
    Xu Yawei
    Kang Jiaqi
    Wang Xianhao
    Song Yuxuan
    Hu Rui
    Zhang Wei
    Ou Ningjing
    [J]. BMC Cancer, 19
  • [4] Accuracy of the magnetic resonance imaging pathway in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Butaney, Mohit
    Bongiorno, Connie
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Bolton, Damien M.
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2019, 22 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [5] Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang Zhen
    Xiaoqiang Liu
    Chen Yegang
    Yang Yongjiao
    Xu Yawei
    Kang Jiaqi
    Wang Xianhao
    Song Yuxuan
    Hu Rui
    Zhang Wei
    Ou Ningjing
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [6] Accuracy of the magnetic resonance imaging pathway in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niranjan J. Sathianathen
    Mohit Butaney
    Connie Bongiorno
    Badrinath R. Konety
    Damien M. Bolton
    Nathan Lawrentschuk
    [J]. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2019, 22 : 39 - 48
  • [7] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Haider, M. A.
    Yao, X.
    Loblaw, A.
    Finelli, A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 550 - 567
  • [8] Claustrophobia in magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Munn, Zachary
    Moola, Sandeep
    Lisy, Karolina
    Riitano, Dagmara
    Murphy, Fred
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2015, 21 (02) : E59 - E63
  • [9] A qualitative approach to combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Villeirs, Geert M.
    Oosterlinck, Willem
    Vanherreweghe, Els
    De Meerleer, Gert O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 73 (02) : 352 - 356
  • [10] MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING -RADIOMICS IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Cuccu, Ilaria
    Di Donato, Violante
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    D'Auge, Tullio Golia
    Perniola, Giorgia
    Palaia, Innocenza
    Tomao, Federica
    Giannini, Andrea
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Bogani, Giorgio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A156 - A156