Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Mullerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment?

被引:15
|
作者
Lee, Yubin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Tae Hyung [1 ]
Park, Jae Kyun [1 ]
Eum, Jin Hee [1 ]
Lee, Hee Jun [1 ]
Kim, Jayeon [1 ,2 ]
Lyu, Sang Woo [1 ]
Kim, You Shin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Woo Sik [1 ]
Yoon, Tae Ki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, CHA Gangnam Med Ctr, Fertil Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] CHA Fertil Ctr, Seoul Stn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Antral follicle count; Aged; In vitro fertilization; Clinical pregnancy; Live birth; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; POOR OVARIAN RESPONSE; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE; CYCLE CANCELLATION; RESERVE; WOMEN; PREGNANCY; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.047
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate clinical utility of antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in predicting in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes among the patients over 40 years old in their first IVF cycles. Study design: Total 219 patients aged 40 or older who underwent their first IVF with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol from January 2013 to September 2014 in CHA Gangnam fertility center were retrospectively analyzed. AFC and serum samples were measured prior to IVF treatment. The main outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate and live birth. Results: 36 out of 219 patients achieved clinical pregnancy (16.4%) and 27 out of 219 patients delivered (12.3%). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to predict clinical pregnancy showed that both age and AFC equally had higher accuracy by area under the curve (AUC = 0.657, P < 0.01) than serum AMH (AUC 0.613, P = 0.03). The optimum cut-off value of age was <= 41 and that of AFC was >3 to predict clinical pregnancy. For the prediction of live birth, AFC had the highest accuracy (AUC 0.698, P < 0.01), followed by age (AUC 0.674, P < 0.01) and the number of total retrieved oocytes (AUC 0.620, P = 0.02). The optimum cut-off value of age was <= 41, that of AFC was >3 and that of the number of total retrieved oocytes were >6. With multivariate regression analysis, age and AMH were significantly correlated with clinical pregnancy (age, odds ratio [OR] 0.53, P < 0.01; AMH, OR 1.31, P = 0.04), whereas age and AFC were association with live birth significantly (age, OR 0.41, P < 0.01; AFC, OR 1.10, P = 0.02). Conclusion: In patients aged over 40, AFC and AMH were shown to be good biomarkers for the prediction of clinical pregnancy and live birth. Although AMH was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and had no association with live birth, the predictive value of AFC and AMH were similar for both clinical pregnancy and live birth. To predict the live birth, age <= 41, AFC >3 and total retrieved oocytes >6 appeared to be meaningful. This study demonstrated the significance of AMH and AFC as predictors of clinical pregnancy and live birth for old aged women at their first IVF cycle with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 155
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count for prediction of ovarian stimulation response in polycystic ovary syndrome
    El-Mazny, Akmal
    Abou-Salem, Nermeen
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (09) : 826 - 829
  • [22] Discordant anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) among women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): which one is the better predictor for live birth?
    Wang, Shunping
    Zhang, Yi
    Mensah, Virginia
    Huber, Warren J., III
    Huang, Yen-Tsung
    Alvero, Ruben
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2018, 11
  • [23] A comparison of serum anti-mullerian hormone and cycle baseline follicle stimulating hormone in prediction of IVF outcomes
    Singer, T.
    Barad, D.
    Gleicher, N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 : S97 - S97
  • [24] Prediction value of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) serum levels and antral follicle count (AFC) in hormonal contraceptive (HC) users and non-HC users undergoing IVF-PGD treatment
    Bas-Lando, Maayan
    Rabinowitz, Ron
    Farkash, Rivka
    Algur, Nurit
    Rubinstein, Esther
    Schonberger, Oshrat
    Eldar-Geva, Talia
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 33 (10) : 797 - 800
  • [25] Comparing the intercycle variation of serum anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count measurements over four consecutive menstrual cycles
    Wong, Evelyn
    Ng, Ernest H. Y.
    Li, Raymond H. W.
    Ko, Jennifer K. Y.
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 98 (03) : 394 - 399
  • [26] Effects of anti-mullerian hormone and basal antral follicle count on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes in older adults
    Sun, Hairu
    Ma, Lijuan
    Miao, Yanmei
    Wu, Yangyang
    Jiao, Yan
    Su, Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (10): : 7379 - 7385
  • [27] Predictive values of anti-mullerian hormone, antral follicle count and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) for assisted reproductive technology outcomes
    Ashrafi, Mahnaz
    Hemat, Mandana
    Arabipoor, Arezoo
    Yazdi, Reza Salman
    Bahman-Abadi, Akram
    Cheraghi, Rezvaneh
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 37 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [28] Comparing the inter-cycle variation of serum anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count measurements in predicting ovarian response before IVF
    Li, H. W. R.
    Yeung, T. W. Y.
    Lee, V. C. Y.
    Yeung, W. S. B.
    Ho, P. C.
    Ng, E. H. Y.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 446 - 446
  • [29] THE ROLE OF ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE MEASUREMENT IN THE PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION: COMPARISON WITH THE ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT
    Habara, T.
    Hirata, R.
    Aoi, Y.
    Terada, S.
    Yoshioka, N.
    Hayashi, N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S198 - S199
  • [30] THE VALUE OF ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE, FSH, ESTRADIOL, ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT AND CLINICAL FINDINGS AS MARKERS OF PREDICTING MENOPAUSE
    Kim, S.
    Kim, S.
    Choi, Y. M.
    Moon, S. Y.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S195 - S195