Advances in understanding DNA processing and protection at stalled replication forks

被引:112
|
作者
Rickman, Kimberly [1 ]
Smogorzewska, Agata [1 ]
机构
[1] Rockefeller Univ, Lab Genome Maintenance, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY | 2019年 / 218卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS; GENOME STABILITY; MRE11-DEPENDENT DEGRADATION; NASCENT DNA; HUMAN HLTF; RAD51; REVERSAL; RESTART; BRCA2;
D O I
10.1083/jcb.201809012
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The replisome, the molecular machine dedicated to copying DNA, encounters a variety of obstacles during S phase. Without a proper response to this replication stress, the genome becomes unstable, leading to disease, including cancer. The immediate response is localized to the stalled replisome and includes protection of the nascent DNA. A number of recent studies have provided insight into the factors recruited to and responsible for protecting stalled replication forks. In response to replication stress, the SNF2 family of DNA translocases has emerged as being responsible for remodeling replication forks in vivo. The protection of stalled replication forks requires the cooperation of RAD51, BRCA1, BRCA2, and many other DNA damage response proteins. In the absence of these fork protection factors, fork remodeling renders them vulnerable to degradation by nucleases and helicases, ultimately compromising genome integrity. In this review, we focus on the recent progress in understanding the protection, processing, and remodeling of stalled replication forks in mammalian cells.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1107
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A model of DNA damage response activation at stalled replication forks by SPRTN
    Bruhn, Christopher
    Foiani, Marco
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [22] Both DNA Polymerases δ and ε Contact Active and Stalled Replication Forks Differently
    Yu, Chuanhe
    Gan, Haiyun
    Zhang, Zhiguo
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2017, 37 (21)
  • [23] Repriming of DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks by human Prim Pol
    Mouron, Silvana
    Rodriguez-Acebes, Sara
    Martinez-Jimenez, Maria I.
    Garcia-Gomez, Sara
    Chocron, Sandra
    Blanco, Luis
    Mendez, Juan
    NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (12) : 1383 - 1389
  • [24] Protection of nascent DNA at stalled replication forks is mediated by phosphorylation of RIF1 intrinsically disordered region
    Balasubramanian, Sandhya
    Andreani, Matteo
    Andrade, Julia Goncalves
    Saha, Tannishtha
    Sundaravinayagam, Devakumar
    Garzon, Javier
    Zhang, Wenzhu
    Popp, Oliver
    Hiraga, Shin-ichiro
    Rahjouei, Ali
    Rosen, Daniel B.
    Mertins, Philipp
    Chait, Brian T.
    Donaldson, Anne D.
    Di Virgilio, Michela
    ELIFE, 2022, 11
  • [25] Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks
    Michel, B
    Grompone, G
    Florès, MJ
    Bidnenko, V
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (35) : 12783 - 12788
  • [26] Lesion Bypass and the Reactivation of Stalled Replication Forks
    Marians, Kenneth J.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, VOL 87, 2018, 87 : 217 - 238
  • [27] Roles of SDE2 and TIMELESS at active and stalled DNA replication forks
    Lo, Natalie
    Rageul, Julie
    Kim, Hyungjin
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [28] Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks
    Branzei, Dana
    Foiani, Marco
    DNA REPAIR, 2007, 6 (07) : 994 - 1003
  • [29] A critical role of the 3′ terminus of nascent DNA chains in recognition of stalled replication forks
    Mizukoshi, T
    Tanaka, T
    Arai, K
    Kohda, D
    Masai, H
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 278 (43) : 42234 - 42239
  • [30] Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks
    Heller, Ryan C.
    Marians, Kenneth J.
    NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2006, 7 (12) : 932 - 943