Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI

被引:106
|
作者
Fink, GR
Marshall, JC
Weiss, PH
Toni, I
Zilles, K
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Med, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Neurol, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Oxford, Radcliffe Infirm, Dept Clin Neurol, Neuropsychol Unit, Oxford OX2 6HE, England
[4] Univ Dusseldorf, C&O VOgt Inst Hirnforsch, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
visuo-spatial neglect; landmark task; temporo-parietal cortex; early visual processing;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00087-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Manual line bisection and a perceptual variant thereof (the Landmark test) are widely used to assess visuospatial neglect in neurological patients, but little is known about the cognitive strategies involved. In the Landmark test, one could explicitly compare the lengths of the left and right line segments; alternatively, one could compute the centre of mass of the display. We here investigate with functional MRI if these cognitive strategies modulate the neural mechanisms underlying judgements whether pre-transected horizontal lines are correctly bisected (the Landmark test) in normal volunteers. Functional neuroimaging (fMRI) was carried out in 12 healthy volunteers who judged: (a) whether the line segments on either side of the transection mark were of equal length, and (b) whether the transection mark was in the centre of the line. Line centre judgements were made significantly faster than line length comparisons. Increased neural activity common to both strategies was observed in inferior parietal lobes bilaterally and right temporooccipital cortex. Further activations, most likely reflecting general task demands like response selection and motor control, were found in the precentral gyrus bilaterally, supplementary motor area bilaterally, right anterior cingulate, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cerebellar vermis, and right thalamus and right putamen. Explicit length comparisons (relative to line centre judgements) differentially activated left superior posterior parietal cortex, with a tendency toward activation of the equivalent area on the right, while the reverse comparison revealed differential activation in the lingual gyrus bilaterally and anterior cingulate cortex. The activations observed in inferior parietal cortex during task performance using either strategy are consistent with the results of lesion studies. The differential activation of superior posterior parietal cortex following length instructions suggests that explicit comparisons of spatial extent were implicated. The differential activation of bilateral occipital cortex following centre judgements suggests that the centre of a line is extracted at an early stage of visual processing. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 130
页数:12
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: Evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI
    Fink, GR
    Marshall, JC
    Weiss, PH
    Toni, I
    Zilles, K
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S313 - S313
  • [2] Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: Evidence from repeated task-switching
    Swainson, R
    Cunnington, R
    Jackson, GM
    Rorden, C
    Peters, AM
    Morris, PG
    Jackson, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (06) : 785 - 799
  • [3] Developmental changes in neural lateralization for visual-spatial function: Evidence from a line-bisection task
    Ferrara, Katrina
    Seydell-Greenwald, Anna
    Chambers, Catherine E.
    Newport, Elissa L.
    Landau, Barbara
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 25 (04)
  • [4] Distinct and temporally associated neural mechanisms underlying concurrent, postsuccess, and posterror cognitive controls: Evidence from a stop-signal task
    Cao, Hengyi
    Cannon, Tyrone D.
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2021, 42 (09) : 2677 - 2690