Distinct and temporally associated neural mechanisms underlying concurrent, postsuccess, and posterror cognitive controls: Evidence from a stop-signal task

被引:6
|
作者
Cao, Hengyi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cannon, Tyrone D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Feinstein Inst Med Res, Ctr Psychiat Neurosci, Manhasset, NY USA
[2] Zucker Hillside Hosp, Div Psychiat Res, Glen Oaks, NY USA
[3] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Dept Psychiat, Hempstead, NY USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Univ, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
cerebellum; cingulo‐ opercular network; cognitive control; fronto‐ parietal network; posterror; poststop; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER; BAYESIAN MODEL SELECTION; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; RESPONSE-CONFLICT; ERROR-DETECTION; INHIBITION; DYSFUNCTION; CEREBELLUM; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.25347
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Cognitive control is built upon the interactions of multiple brain regions. It is currently unclear whether the involved regions are temporally separable in relation to different cognitive processes and how these regions are temporally associated in relation to different task performances. Here, using stop-signal task data acquired from 119 healthy participants, we showed that concurrent and poststop cognitive controls were associated with temporally distinct but interrelated neural mechanisms. Specifically, concurrent cognitive control activated regions in the cingulo-opercular network (including the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex [dACC], insula, and thalamus), together with superior temporal gyrus, secondary motor areas, and visual cortex; while regions in the fronto-parietal network (including the lateral prefrontal cortex [lPFC] and inferior parietal lobule) and cerebellum were only activated during poststop cognitive control. The associations of activities between concurrent and poststop regions were dependent on task performance, with the most notable difference in the cerebellum. Importantly, while concurrent and poststop signals were significantly correlated during successful cognitive control, concurrent activations during erroneous trials were only correlated with posterror activations in the fronto-parietal network but not cerebellum. Instead, the cerebellar activation during posterror cognitive control was likely to be driven secondarily by posterror activation in the lPFC. Further, a dynamic causal modeling analysis demonstrated that postsuccess cognitive control was associated with inhibitory connectivity from the lPFC to cerebellum, while excitatory connectivity from the lPFC to cerebellum was present during posterror cognitive control. Overall, these findings suggest dissociable but temporally related neural mechanisms underlying concurrent, postsuccess, and posterror cognitive control processes in healthy individuals.
引用
收藏
页码:2677 / 2690
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Electrophysiological Evidence for Distinct Proactive Control Mechanisms in a Stop-Signal Task: An Individual Differences Approach
    Lee, Woo-Tek
    Kang, Min-Suk
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [2] AUTONOMIC AND NEURAL MECHANISMS SUPPORTING INHIBITORY CONTROL IN A STOP-SIGNAL TASK
    Karns, Christina M.
    Giuliano, Ryan J.
    Pakulak, Eric
    Bell, Theodore
    Petersen, Seth
    Skowron, Elizabeth
    Neville, Helen J.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 52 : S55 - S55
  • [3] Interaction between stop-signal inhibition and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence for two separate control mechanisms
    Kalanthroff, E.
    Goldfarb, L.
    Henik, A.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 45 (SUPPL 1) : S58 - S58
  • [4] Exercise Improves Cognitive Control: Evidence from the Stop Signal Task
    Padilla, Concepcion
    Perez, Laura
    Andres, Pilar
    Parmentier, Fabrice B. R.
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 27 (04) : 505 - 511
  • [5] Sentential negation modulates inhibition in a stop-signal task. Evidence from behavioral and ERP data
    Beltran, David
    Muneton-Ayala, Mercedes
    de Vega, Manuel
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2018, 112 : 10 - 18
  • [6] Dissociating Consciousness From Inhibitory Control: Evidence for Unconsciously Triggered Response Inhibition in the Stop-Signal Task
    van Gaal, Simon
    Ridderinkhof, K. Richard
    van den Wildenberg, Wery P. M.
    Lamme, Victor A. F.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2009, 35 (04) : 1129 - 1139
  • [7] Neural mechanisms underlying trait impulsivity in non-clinical adults: Stop-signal performance and event-related potentials
    Dimoska, Aneta
    Johnstone, Stuart J.
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 31 (02): : 443 - 454
  • [8] INHIBITORY CONTROL ERPS PREDICT FORGIVENESS OF INTERPERSONAL BETRAYAL: EVIDENCE FROM A STOP-SIGNAL REACTION TIME TASK
    Burdwood, Erin N.
    Valadez, Emilio A.
    Simons, Robert F.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 53 : S57 - S57
  • [9] Deep neural network to differentiate internet gaming disorder from healthy controls during stop-signal task: a multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study
    Wang, Qiwen
    Li, Yongkang
    Su, Hang
    Zhong, Na
    Xu, Qi
    Li, Xiaoou
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING-BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2023, 68 (05): : 457 - 468
  • [10] The Role of Response Inhibition in Medicated and Unmedicated Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients: Evidence from the Stop-Signal Task
    Kalanthroff, Eyal
    Teichert, Tobias
    Wheaton, Michael G.
    Kimeldorf, Marcia B.
    Linkovski, Omer
    Ahmari, Susanne E.
    Fyer, Abby J.
    Schneier, Franklin R.
    Anholt, Gideon E.
    Simpson, H. Blair
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2017, 34 (03) : 301 - 306