How Safe Is Safe Enough? Radiation Risk for a Human Mission to Mars

被引:139
|
作者
Cucinotta, Francis A. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Myung-Hee Y. [3 ]
Chappell, Lori J. [3 ]
Huff, Janice L. [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Lyndon B Johnson Space Ctr, Space Radiat Program, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Hlth Phys & Diagnost Sci, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[3] Univ Space Res Assoc, Div Space Life Sci, Houston, TX USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 10期
关键词
CIRCULATORY DISEASE; IONIZING-RADIATION; SPACE RADIATION; EXPOSURE; IRRADIATION; CANCER; DEPENDENCE; MORTALITY; RAYS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0074988
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Astronauts on a mission to Mars would be exposed for up to 3 years to galactic cosmic rays (GCR) - made up of high-energy protons and high charge (Z) and energy (E) (HZE) nuclei. GCR exposure rate increases about three times as spacecraft venture out of Earth orbit into deep space where protection of the Earth's magnetosphere and solid body are lost. NASA's radiation standard limits astronaut exposures to a 3% risk of exposure induced death (REID) at the upper 95% confidence interval (CI) of the risk estimate. Fatal cancer risk has been considered the dominant risk for GCR, however recent epidemiological analysis of radiation risks for circulatory diseases allow for predictions of REID for circulatory diseases to be included with cancer risk predictions for space missions. Using NASA's models of risks and uncertainties, we predicted that central estimates for radiation induced mortality and morbidity could exceed 5% and 10% with upper 95% CI near 10% and 20%, respectively for a Mars mission. Additional risks to the central nervous system (CNS) and qualitative differences in the biological effects of GCR compared to terrestrial radiation may significantly increase these estimates, and will require new knowledge to evaluate.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HOW SAFE IS SAFE? RISK IN RADIOTHERAPY
    Ford, Eric C.
    Terezakis, Stephanie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (02): : 321 - 322
  • [32] HOW SAFE IS SAFE? RISK IN RADIOTHERAPY
    Morgan, Graeme
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (05): : 1602 - 1602
  • [33] Cooperation and dialogical modeling for designing a safe Human space exploration mission to Mars
    Gres, Stephane
    Tognini, Michel
    Le Cardinal, Gilles
    Zalila, Zyed
    Gueydan, Guillaume
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2014, 104 (02) : 502 - 508
  • [34] How safe is safe enough, who decides and how? From a zero-risk paradigm to risk-based decision making
    Menitove, Jay E.
    Bennett, Judie Leach
    Tomasulo, Peter
    Katz, Louis M.
    TRANSFUSION, 2014, 54 (03) : 753 - 757
  • [35] Live-attenuated HIV vaccines: How safe is safe enough?
    MurpheyCorb, M
    NATURE MEDICINE, 1997, 3 (01) : 17 - 18
  • [36] How safe is safe enough? Obligations to the children of reproductive technology.
    Mahowald, MB
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2005, 35 (05) : 46 - 47
  • [37] Live-attenuated HIV vaccines: How safe is safe enough?
    Michael Murphey-Corb
    Nature Medicine, 1997, 3 : 17 - 18
  • [38] Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cardiac Devices: How Safe Is Safe Enough?
    Reynolds, Matthew R.
    Zimetbaum, Peter
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (07) : 470 - U109
  • [39] A Quantitative Framework for Defining "How Safe is Safe Enough?" in Crewed Spacecraft
    Ocampo, Robert P.
    Klaus, David M.
    NEW SPACE, 2016, 4 (02): : 75 - 82
  • [40] How close is close enough-how close is safe enough
    Kaiser, H
    Neuburger, M
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (02) : 227 - 228