Baby corn, green corn, and dry corn yield of corn cultivars

被引:4
|
作者
Castro, Renato S. [1 ]
Silva, Paulo Sergio L. [1 ]
Cardoso, Milton J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rural Semi Arido, BR-59625900 Mossoro, RN, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Meio Norte, BR-64006220 Teresina, PI, Brazil
关键词
Zea mays; green ears; grain; prolificacy; GRAIN-YIELD; KERNEL SET; MAIZE HYBRIDS; ROW WIDTH; ZEA-MAYS; EAR; DENSITY; PROLIFICACY; POLLINATION; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1590/S0102-05362013000100016
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
In corn, when the first female inflorescence is removed, the plant often produces new female inflorescences. This allows the first ear to be harvested as baby corn (BC) and the second as green corn (GC) or dry corn (DC), that is, mature corn. The flexibility provided by a variety of harvested products allows the grower to compete with better conditions in the markets. We evaluated BC, GC, and DC yields in corn cultivars AG 1051, AG 2060, and BRS 2020, after the first ear was harvested as BC. A random block design with ten replicates was utilized. The yields of MM, MV and MS were higher when these products were individually harvested than when they were harvested in combination with baby corn (BC + GC and BC + DC). Cultivar BRS 2020 was the best for producing BC exclusively, considering the number and weight of marketable unhusked ears and the number (NH) of marketable husked ears. Considering weight (WH) of BC marketable husked ears, cultivar AG 1051 was the best. Cultivars did not differ in baby corn yield when this product was harvested in combination with MS or MV, except with regard to NH and WH, with AG 1051 being superior. The cultivars did not differ between total number of ears and number of marketable unhusked green ears. However, cultivars AG 1051 and AG 2060 were the best with respect to marketable unhusked green ears and number and weight of marketable husked green ears. Cultivar AG 1051 was the best with regard to kernel yield.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 105
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EFFECT OF RUST ON QUALITY AND YIELD OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS
    GROTH, JV
    ZEYEN, RJ
    DAVIS, DW
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1979, 69 (09) : 1029 - 1029
  • [22] In-situ corn fiber conversion improves ethanol yield in corn dry-mill process
    Li, Xiujuan
    Chen, Sitong
    Huang, He
    Jin, Mingjie
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2018, 113 : 217 - 224
  • [23] Effect of substituting dry corn with rehydrated ensiled corn on dairy cow milk yield and nutrient digestibility
    Arcari, M. A.
    Martins, C. M. M. R.
    Tomazi, T.
    Goncalves, J. L.
    Santos, M. V.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 221 : 167 - 173
  • [24] 'GREEN CORN MOON'
    STEPHENS, P
    MIDWEST QUARTERLY-A JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY THOUGHT, 1989, 30 (02): : 207 - 207
  • [25] WILLIAMS THE 'CORN IS GREEN'
    ALLEN, P
    DRAMA, 1981, (141): : 36 - 36
  • [26] WILLIAMS THE 'CORN IS GREEN'
    KISSEL, H
    NEW YORK THEATRE CRITICS REVIEWS, 1983, 44 (12): : 185 - 185
  • [27] THE EFFECT OF WEATHER CONDITIONS ON CORN SMUT INFECTION AND EUROPEAN CORN BORER INFESTATION IN SEVERAL CULTIVARS OF SWEET CORN
    Waligora, Hubert
    Weber, Anna
    Skrzypczak, Witold
    Chwastek, Eugeniusz
    ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2014, 31 : 357 - 366
  • [28] Studies on the effect of corn hybrid and foliar fungicide on disease severity and yield in corn in the US Corn Belt
    Mallowa, S. O.
    Esker, P.
    Paul, P.
    Bradley, C.
    Robertson, A.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2012, 102 (09) : 7 - 7
  • [29] Combined selection for productivity, adaptability, and stability in corn genotypes for baby corn production
    Nascimento, Maxwel Rodrigues
    de Melo, Gersia Goncalves
    de Oliveira, Luciano Antonio
    da Silva, Alessandra Querino
    da Silva, Carlos Pereira
    Ricardo dos Santos, Paulo
    Daher, Rogerio Figueiredo
    CROP SCIENCE, 2024, 64 (04) : 2158 - 2169
  • [30] Effect of detasseling on baby corn, green ear and grain yield of two maize hybrids
    Moreira, Joserlan N.
    Silva, Paulo Sergio L.
    Silva, Kathia M. B.
    Dombroski, Jeferson L. D.
    Castro, Renato S.
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2010, 28 (04) : 406 - 411