Single-Leg Squat After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of the Knee Valgus Angle at 6 and 12 Months

被引:9
|
作者
Batty, Lachlan M. [1 ,3 ]
Feller, Julian A. [1 ,2 ]
Damasena, Iswadi [1 ]
Behrens, Gerrit [1 ,4 ]
Devitt, Brian M. [1 ]
Hartwig, Taylor [1 ]
McClelland, Jodie A. [1 ,2 ]
Webster, Kate E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] OrthoSport Victoria Res Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Human Serv & Sport, Hlth Sci 3 Bldg, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] St Vincents Hosp Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Praxisklin Rennbahn AG, Muttenz, Switzerland
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; rehabilitation; neuromuscular; knee valgus angle; valgus collapse; single-leg squat; BIOMECHANICAL MEASURES; NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL; QUADRICEPS STRENGTH; INJURY RISK; PERFORMANCE; HIP; KINEMATICS; RETURN; MECHANISMS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1177/2325967120946328
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Deficits in neuromuscular control are common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and may be associated with further knee injury. The knee valgus angle during a single-leg squat (SLS) is one measure of neuromuscular performance. Purpose: To determine whether the knee valgus angle during SLS changes between 6 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction and to assess how the operative knee valgus angle compares with that of the contralateral side. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A cohort of 100 patients with uninjured contralateral knees were assessed at 6 and 12 months after primary hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction. Participants performed the SLS on each leg, and the knee valgus angle was measured via frame-by-frame video analysis at 30 degrees of flexion and at each patient's maximum knee flexion angle. Results: For the operative limb at 30 degrees of flexion, a small but statistically significant reduction was noted in the valgus angle between 6 and 12 months (5.46 degrees vs 4.44 degrees;P= .002; effect size = 0.24). At 6 months, a slightly higher valgus angle was seen in the operative limb compared with the nonoperative limb (5.46 degrees vs 4.29 degrees;P= .008; effect size = 0.27). At maximum flexion, no difference was seen between limbs in the valgus angle at either 6 or 12 months, and no change was seen in the operative limb between 6 and 12 months. At 6 months and 30 degrees of knee flexion, 13 patients had a valgus angle greater than 10 degrees. This group also had a higher mean valgus angle in the contralateral limb compared with the contralateral limb in the other 87 patients (8.5 degrees vs 3.65 degrees;P< .001). Conclusion: During a controlled SLS, the knee valgus angle remained essentially constant, and minimal limb asymmetries were present over the 6- to 12-month postoperative period, a time when athletes typically increase their activity levels. Whether changes or asymmetries will be seen with more dynamically challenging tasks remains to be determined. When present, high valgus angles were commonly bilateral.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel single-leg squat test with speed and accuracy requirements: Reliability and validity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed individuals
    Cardoso, Vanessa A.
    Resende, Renan A.
    Aquino, Cecilia F.
    Andrade, Andre G. P.
    Silva, Paula L. P.
    Amaral, Giovanna M.
    Fonseca, Sergio T.
    Ocarino, Juliana M.
    KNEE, 2021, 29 : 150 - 159
  • [32] Anterior Knee Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Marques, Fabiano da Silva
    Barbosa, Pedro Henrique Borges
    Alves, Pedro Rodrigues
    Zelada, Sandro
    Nunes, Rodrigo Pereira da Silva
    de Souza, Marcio Regis
    Pedro, Marcio do Amaral Camargo
    Nunes, Jose Francisco
    Alves, Wilson Mello, Jr.
    de Campos, Gustavo Constantino
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (10)
  • [33] Graft Differences and Knee Biomechanics six Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Nawasreh, Zakariya H.
    Logerstedt, David
    White, Kathleen
    Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 222 - 223
  • [34] Single-leg postural stability deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in pediatric and adolescent athletes
    Sugimoto, Dai
    Howell, David R.
    Micheli, Lyle J.
    Meehan, William P., III
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2016, 25 (04): : 338 - 342
  • [35] Mechanical energy flow analysis in athletes with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during single-leg drop landing
    Hamidreza Zanguie
    Rahman Sheikhhoseini
    Mohammad Yousefi
    Julie A. Hides
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [36] Mechanical energy flow analysis in athletes with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during single-leg drop landing
    Zanguie, Hamidreza
    Sheikhhoseini, Rahman
    Yousefi, Mohammad
    Hides, Julie A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [37] Asymmetries in Two-Dimensional Trunk and Knee Kinematics During a Single-Leg Drop Landing Post Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Vorensky, Mark
    Peredo, Daniel
    Colon, Wil
    Rao, Smita
    Kakar, Rumit Singh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC THERAPY & TRAINING, 2023, 28 (05): : 244 - 252
  • [38] Bilateral kinematic and kinetic analysis of the squat exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Salem, GJ
    Salinas, R
    Harding, FV
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (08): : 1211 - 1216
  • [39] Knee Bracing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan, E.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (04) : E602 - E609
  • [40] Quadriceps Strength and Knee-Related Symptom State 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Walaszek, Michelle C.
    Grindstaff, Terry L.
    Hart, Joseph M.
    Birchmeier, Thomas
    Triplett, Ashley
    Collins, Katherine
    Harkey, Matthew
    Shingles, Michael
    Straus, Michael
    Kuenze, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2023, 58 (06) : 536 - 541