Does the development and implementation of a procedure-specific proforma for skin lesion surgery improve quality of operation notes?

被引:1
|
作者
Masterton, Gary [1 ]
Hassan, Deniz [1 ]
Siddiqui, Aftab [1 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, England
来源
JPRAS OPEN | 2021年 / 28卷
关键词
Skin lesions; Skin pathology; Operation notes; Skin cancer; Operation note proforma; Plastic surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpra.2021.01.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Operation notes often have omissions and are difficult to locate in patients notes despite clear guidance from the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) 'Good Surgical Practice' 2014 outlining what should be included in operation notes. Procedure-specific proformas are rarely used by Plastic surgeons despite being utilised by other specialities. With an alarming rise of incidence of skin malignancies there has been an increase in the number of skin lesions referred to Plastic surgeons for excision. The need for reliable, reproducible, accurate and easily accessible operating notes for skin lesion excision is pivotal for continuity of care and treatment planning. This study aimed at comparing the quality of skin lesion operation notes prior-to and after implementation of a procedure-specific proforma in relation to RCS recommendations. Methods: Fourteen parameters from the recommendations by the RCS `Good Surgical Practice' 2014 guidelines were used to audit skin lesion operation notes. The study consisted of a retrospective audit of 80 operation notes and a prospective audit of 80 operation notes following the development and implementation of a skin lesion procedure-specific proforma. We assessed and compared the operation notes overall compliance with the RCS guidelines. Statistical analysis highlighting the difference between both groups was performed using the independent sample t-test. Results: After implementation of the skin lesion procedure-specific proforma, the average compliance with the RCS recommendations increased significantly from 87.5% retrospectively to 98.8% prospectively (p-value 0.0414). In 6 of the 14 parameters assessed significant improvements with regards compliance to the guidelines was demonstrated. Conclusion: The development and implementation of a skin lesion procedure-specific proforma has demonstrated a significant improvement in the quality of operation notes within a Plastic surgery department which has the potential to minimise omissions and improve continuity of surgical patient care. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 109
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] A Thorough Note: Does a Procedure-Specific Operation Note Proforma Improve Compliance with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines?
    Abbas, S. H.
    Singh, S.
    Sundran, R.
    Gilmour, J.
    Puttick, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 65 - 66
  • [2] Improving the quality of procedure-specific operation reports in orthopaedic surgery
    Barritt, Andrew W.
    Clark, Laura
    Cohen, Adam M. M.
    Hosangadi-Jayedev, Naveen
    Gibb, Paul A.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2010, 92 (02) : 159 - 162
  • [3] A thorough note: Does a procedure-specific operation note proforma for laparoscopic appendicectomy improve compliance with the Royal College of Surgeons of England Guidelines?
    Abbas, S. H.
    Singh, S.
    Sundran, R.
    Akbari, K.
    Gilmour, J.
    Puttick, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN, 2016, 2 : 1 - 5
  • [4] An electronic operation note proforma improves the quality of operation notes in burns surgery
    Kelly, Gerard A.
    Shelley, Odhran P.
    Cahill, Kevin C.
    BURNS, 2023, 49 (03) : 664 - 669
  • [5] Does an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) improve the quality of general surgery operation notes?
    Aldoori, J.
    Drye, N.
    Barrie, J.
    Peter, M.
    Sah, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 56 - 56
  • [6] Does hospital procedure-specific volume affect treatment costs? A national study of knee replacement surgery
    Gutierrez, B
    Culler, SD
    Freund, DA
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 1998, 33 (03) : 489 - 511
  • [7] Development and validation of a procedure-specific assessment tool for hands-on surgical training in congenital heart surgery
    Hussein, Nabil
    Lim, Andrew
    Honjo, Osami
    Haller, Christoph
    Coles, John G.
    Van Arsdell, Glen
    Yoo, Shi-Joon
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 160 (01): : 229 - 240
  • [8] Audit of operation notes from a single Otorhinolaryngology Unit: Does new template improve quality?
    Apparau, D.
    Slim, M. A. M.
    Dick, D.
    Trimble, K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 117 - 118
  • [9] Development of procedure-specific patient information sheets for acute abdominal surgery and validation in patients undergoing urgent cholecystectomy or appendicectomy
    King, NK
    Cheeseman, GA
    Siriwardena, AK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 58 (06) : 559 - 563
  • [10] Does the use of a standardised clerking proforma for acute general surgery admissions improve the quality of documentation? A prospective two-cycle audit
    Singh, P.
    Wyatt, H.
    Taylor, H.
    Patel, V.
    Francis, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 23 - 24