Advanced criticality assessment method for sewer pipeline assets

被引:16
|
作者
Syachrani, S. [1 ]
Jeong, H. D. [2 ]
Chung, C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] GHD Inc, Irvine, CA 92618 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
calendar age; probability of failure; real age; sewer pipe; DETERIORATION MODELS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2013.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For effective management of water and wastewater infrastructure, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) has long emphasized the significant role of risk in prioritizing and optimizing asset management decisions. High risk assets are defined as assets with a high probability of failure (e.g. soon to fail, old, poor condition) and high consequences of failure (e.g. environmental impact, high expense, safety concerns, social disruption). In practice, the consequences of failure are often estimated by experts through a Delphi method. However, the estimation of the probability of failure has been challenging as it requires the thorough analysis of the historical condition assessment data, repair and replacement records, and other factors influencing the deterioration of the asset. The most common predictor in estimating the probability of failure is calendar age. However, a simple reliance on calendar age as a basis for estimating the asset's deterioration pattern completely ignores the different aging characteristics influenced by various operational and environmental conditions. This paper introduces a new approach of using 'real age' in estimating the probability of failure. Unlike the traditional calendar age method, the real age represents the adjusted age based on the unique operational and environmental conditions of the asset. Depending on the individual deterioration pattern, the real age could be higher or lower than its calendar age. Using the concept of real age, the probability of failure of an asset can be more accurately estimated.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1309
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Fuzzy Multidimensional Risk Assessment Method for Sewer Asset Management
    Roghani, Bardia
    Tabesh, Massoud
    Cherqui, Frederic
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [22] A Fuzzy Multidimensional Risk Assessment Method for Sewer Asset Management
    Bardia Roghani
    Massoud Tabesh
    Frédéric Cherqui
    International Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024, 22 : 1 - 17
  • [23] Criticality Assessment Method for Automated Driving Systems by Introducing Fictive Vehicles and Variable Criticality Thresholds
    Nalic, Demin
    Mihalj, Tomislav
    Orucevic, Faris
    Schabauer, Martin
    Lex, Cornelia
    Sinz, Wolfgang
    Eichberger, Arno
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (22)
  • [24] New Method for Failure Assessment of Cracked Pipeline
    Bai Yongqiang
    Wang Tong
    Lu Lianghai
    Sun Liang
    Shuai Jian
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL. VIII, PTS A AND B, 2010, 8 : 1827 - 1831
  • [25] Application of the Failure Assessment Method for Cracked Pipeline
    Bai Yongqiang
    Lv Lianghai
    Wang Tong
    Zhang Xiaofeng
    ADVANCED CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 919-921 : 455 - 459
  • [26] A DECISION MAKING METHOD OF PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT
    Lu, Hong
    Denby, Allison
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE 2010, VOL 1, 2010, : 323 - 328
  • [27] Criticality Model to Prioritize Pipeline Rehabilitation Decisions
    Kaddoura, Khalid
    Zayed, Tarek
    PIPELINES 2018: CONDITION ASSESSMENT, CONSTRUCTION, AND REHABILITATION, 2018, : 75 - 85
  • [28] Tanks criticality assessment by the dependability method. Case study
    Hammoum, Hocine
    Bouzelha, Karima
    Aider, Hacene Ait
    Hannachi, Naceur Eddine
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2014, 41 : 10 - 22
  • [29] A Criticality Assessment Method for Power Transmission Lines in Power System
    Liu, Wenying
    Liang, Cai
    ADVANCED RESEARCH IN MATERIAL SCIENCE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 446-447 : 817 - +
  • [30] LEVERAGING HCA RESULTS IN AN ADVANCED PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL
    Huisman, Otto
    Almandoz, Ricardo
    Schuster, Thomas
    Caballero, Adriana Andrade
    Forero, Leonardo Martinez
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 1, 2014,