Advanced criticality assessment method for sewer pipeline assets

被引:16
|
作者
Syachrani, S. [1 ]
Jeong, H. D. [2 ]
Chung, C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] GHD Inc, Irvine, CA 92618 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
calendar age; probability of failure; real age; sewer pipe; DETERIORATION MODELS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2013.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For effective management of water and wastewater infrastructure, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) has long emphasized the significant role of risk in prioritizing and optimizing asset management decisions. High risk assets are defined as assets with a high probability of failure (e.g. soon to fail, old, poor condition) and high consequences of failure (e.g. environmental impact, high expense, safety concerns, social disruption). In practice, the consequences of failure are often estimated by experts through a Delphi method. However, the estimation of the probability of failure has been challenging as it requires the thorough analysis of the historical condition assessment data, repair and replacement records, and other factors influencing the deterioration of the asset. The most common predictor in estimating the probability of failure is calendar age. However, a simple reliance on calendar age as a basis for estimating the asset's deterioration pattern completely ignores the different aging characteristics influenced by various operational and environmental conditions. This paper introduces a new approach of using 'real age' in estimating the probability of failure. Unlike the traditional calendar age method, the real age represents the adjusted age based on the unique operational and environmental conditions of the asset. Depending on the individual deterioration pattern, the real age could be higher or lower than its calendar age. Using the concept of real age, the probability of failure of an asset can be more accurately estimated.
引用
收藏
页码:1302 / 1309
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment Framework for the Maintainability of Sewer Pipeline Systems
    Alqahtani, Fahad K.
    Alsharef, Abdullah
    Hommadi, Ghalib M.
    Alammari, Mohammed A.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (21):
  • [2] Bad Actors Criticality Assessment for Pipeline system
    Nasir, Meseret
    Chong, Kit Wee
    Osman, Sabtuni
    Khur, Wee Siaw
    9TH CURTIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2014 (CUTSE2014), 2015, 78
  • [3] Automated defect detection for sewer pipeline inspection and condition assessment
    Guo, W.
    Soibelman, L.
    Garrett, J. H., Jr.
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 18 (05) : 587 - 596
  • [4] Criticality Assessment of Transmission Assets Using a Node-Breaker Model
    Wang, Yingying
    Vittal, Vijay
    Heydt, Gerald T.
    Quintanilla, Faustino L.
    Knuth, Wesley B.
    2020 52ND NORTH AMERICAN POWER SYMPOSIUM (NAPS), 2021,
  • [5] Neuro-fuzzy approaches for sanitary sewer pipeline condition assessment
    Chae, MJ
    Abraham, DM
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 15 (01) : 4 - 14
  • [6] Review on Computer Aided Sewer Pipeline Defect Detection and Condition Assessment
    Moradi, Saeed
    Zayed, Tarek
    Golkhoo, Farzaneh
    INFRASTRUCTURES, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [7] ADVANCED ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE RIVER CROSSINGS
    Pathak, Saurav
    Dinovitzer, Aaron
    Fredj, Abdelfettah
    Song, Peter
    Fathi, Ali
    Tetteh-Wayoe, Debra
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 14TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, IPC2022, VOL 3, 2022,
  • [8] A condition assessment method for roadside assets
    Gharaibeh, Nasir G.
    Lindholm, Debora
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (03) : 409 - 418
  • [9] ASSETS OF MODEL METRO STATION AND THEIR CRITICALITY
    Kertis, Tomas
    Prochazkova, Dana
    SCIENTIFIC STUDENT CONFERENCE INTEROPERABILITY OF RAILWAY TRANSPORT - (IRICON 2016), 2016, 5 : 29 - 37
  • [10] Defect Severity Assessment Model for Sewer Pipeline Based on Automated Pipe Calibration
    Jia, Pengtao
    Liao, Yongqiang
    Zhao, Qi
    He, Min
    Guo, Muyuan
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2023, 14 (03)