Bio-physical models of marine environments reveal biases in the representation of protected areas

被引:12
|
作者
Roberts, Kelsey E. [1 ]
Duffy, Grant A. [1 ]
Cook, Carly N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Bio-physical modelling; bioregion; environmental surrogates; habitat mapping; marine protected area; spatial analysis; surrogate variables; CONSERVATION; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS; SURROGATES; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKS; RESERVES; DEPTH; REEF; SEAS;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.3003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The significant shortfall in global marine protection targets is likely to continue to drive rapid growth in marine protected areas (MPAs). Systematic conservation planning to fill gaps in marine protection requires sufficient knowledge of both the distribution of biodiversity and the threats to species and ecosystems. Yet such data are lacking for much of the marine environment, creating significant challenges for planning effective marine protection. In the absence of habitat mapping data, critical environmental variables associated with species' distributions can be used to model the spatial distribution of different environments. Although this approach has been used in some jurisdictions to assist MPA planners, the increased availability and resolution of spatial data now provide an opportunity to improve assessments of MPA representation. Capitalizing on advances in spatial data, this study uses a range of biological and physical environmental attributes to model the distribution of Australian marine environments. Given many Australian MPAs were implemented without knowledge of the distribution of species and benthic habitats, this Bio-physical model is used to assess MPA coverage and equality of protection for Australian marine environments. Results of the Bio-physical model revealed that Australian MPAs overrepresent warm, offshore waters (such as the Coral Sea) and underrepresent temperate environments. Furthermore, the distribution of protection in Australian MPAs is heavily skewed, with no-take protection disproportionately targeting tropical environments, leaving major gaps in the protection of both temperate and nearshore habitats. Without comprehensive habitat mapping, the representativeness and adequacy of an MPA system cannot be accurately evaluated, nor can the required expansion of MPAs be planned effectively. In the interim, the biological and physical attributes chosen for this model provide useful proxies to assist in efforts to better target current and future protection based on the most up-to-date knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 510
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of bio-physical marine products from SeaWiFS, MODIS and a bio-optical model with in situ measurements from Northern European waters
    Blondeau-Patissier, D
    Tilstone, GH
    Martinez-Vicente, V
    Moore, GF
    JOURNAL OF OPTICS A-PURE AND APPLIED OPTICS, 2004, 6 (09): : 875 - 889
  • [22] LUISA (Library User Interface for Sensitivity Analysis): a generic software component for sensitivity analysis of bio-physical models
    Donatelli, M.
    Confalonieri, R.
    Cerrani, I.
    Fanchini, D.
    Acutis, M.
    Tarantola, S.
    Baruth, B.
    18TH WORLD IMACS CONGRESS AND MODSIM09 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: INTERFACING MODELLING AND SIMULATION WITH MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, : 859 - 865
  • [23] Integration of bio-physical and economic models to analyze management intensity and landscape structure effects at farm and landscape level
    Schoenhart, Martin
    Schauppenlehner, Thomas
    Schmid, Erwin
    Muhar, Andreas
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 104 (02) : 122 - 134
  • [24] Predator-derived bioregions in the Southern Ocean: Characteristics, drivers and representation in marine protected areas
    Reisinger, Ryan R.
    Brooks, Cassandra M.
    Raymond, Ben
    Freer, Jennifer J.
    Cotte, Cedric
    Xavier, Jose C.
    Trathan, Philip N.
    Bornemann, Horst
    Charrassin, Jean-Benoit
    Costa, Daniel P.
    Danis, Bruno
    Huckstadt, Luis
    Jonsen, Ian D.
    Lea, Mary-Anne
    Torres, Leigh
    Van de Putte, Anton
    Wotherspoon, Simon
    Friedlaender, Ari S.
    Ropert-Coudert, Yan
    Hindell, Mark
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 272
  • [25] Assessment of Habitat Representation across a Network of Marine Protected Areas with Implications for the Spatial Design of Monitoring
    Young, Mary
    Carr, Mark
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):
  • [26] Sea Country Indigenous Protected Areas: Indigenous leadership in the protection of Australia's marine environments
    Isaac, Janella
    Mouda, Rowena
    Barrett, David
    Gould, Jackie
    Smyth, Dermot
    Vernes, Tanya
    MARINE POLICY, 2024, 170
  • [27] Using predictive models to identify kelp refuges in marine protected areas for management prioritization
    Young, Mary A.
    Critchell, Kay
    Sams, Michael A.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2025, 35 (01)
  • [28] Models and indicators for assessing conservation and fisheries-related effects of marine protected areas
    Pelletier, Dominique
    Claudet, Joachim
    Ferraris, Jocelyne
    Benedetti-Cecchi, Lisandro
    Garcia-Charton, Jose Antonio
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2008, 65 (04) : 765 - 779
  • [29] Where is the genus Elysia in the western Atlantic? Potential distribution, species richness and representation in marine protected areas
    Marcela Jimenez, Lina
    Simoes, Nuno
    Yanez-Arenas, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF MOLLUSCAN STUDIES, 2021, 87
  • [30] Implementation feasibility of a marine ecotourism product on the reef environments of the marine protected areas of Tinhare and Boipeba Islands (Cairu, Bahia, Brazil)
    Rhormens, Marta Smith
    Pedrini, Alexandre de G.
    Ghilardi-Lopes, Natalia Pirani
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 139 : 1 - 11