Attitudes and perceptions regarding subspecialty training in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery

被引:7
|
作者
Siddighi, Sam [1 ]
Barker, Matthew [1 ]
Pancholy, Apurva [1 ]
Krallman, Kelli [2 ]
Karram, Mickey M. [1 ]
Kleeman, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Good Samaritan Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Female Pelv Med Reconstruct Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45220 USA
[2] Good Samaritan Hosp, Hatton Res Ctr, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
career; female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery; perceptions; urogynecology;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-008-0677-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to evaluate perceptions regarding subspecialty training in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) in the United States. A 57-item questionnaire was anonymously mailed to fellows and applicants to FPMRS fellowship. Seventy-four American fellowship interviewees and current fellows completed the entire questionnaire (56% response rate). Key factors associated with higher interest in FPMRS compared to general obstetrics and gynecology (OBG) included competitiveness to get into fellowship and new developments. Key factors associated with higher interest in FPMRS compared to other subspecialties in obstetrics and gynecology (SUB) were lower risk of malpractice and higher sense of career satisfaction. Commonly cited attributes of FPMRS that attract to the field relate to the complexity of cases and the quantity of time spent in the operating room. Majority of responders preferred academics over private practice or a mixture (55.4%, 17.6%, and 27%, respectively). The most important reason for interest in FPMRS compared to OBG and SUB is quality time in the operating room and lower risk of malpractice, respectively. Results of this study may help attract medical students to OBG and help mentors with career counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1526
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Income differentials required to make fellowship training in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive pelvic surgery financially neutral
    Tyler M. Muffly
    William B. Weeks
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2008, 19 : 151 - 156
  • [32] Effect of COVID-19 on Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship Education and Training
    Butler, Brandy M.
    Biller, Daniel H.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (05): : 336 - 340
  • [33] On the Brink: The Future of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery in Canada
    Cundiff, Geoffrey W.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2011, 33 (12) : 1253 - 1255
  • [34] The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery
    Sussman, Rachael D.
    Peyronnet, Benoit
    Brucker, Benjamin M.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 (05): : 331 - 339
  • [35] IUGA guidelines for training in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive pelvic surgery (FPM-RPS) Updated Guidelines 2010
    Drutz, H. P.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (12) : 1445 - 1453
  • [36] IUGA guidelines for training in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive pelvic surgery (FPM-RPS)Updated Guidelines 2010
    H. P. Drutz
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2010, 21 : 1445 - 1453
  • [37] Concerns regarding pelvic reconstructive surgery
    Shull, B
    Karram, MM
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 16 (04) : 251 - 252
  • [38] Concerns regarding pelvic reconstructive surgery
    Bob Shull
    Mickey M. Karram
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2005, 16 : 251 - 252
  • [39] Workforce Analysis of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015 to 2045
    Brueseke, Taylor
    Muffly, Tyler
    Rayburn, William
    Connolly, AnnaMarie
    Nieto, Maria
    De La Cruz, Jacquia
    Wu, Jennifer
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (05): : 385 - 389
  • [40] Perceptions and Practice Patterns of General Gynecologists Regarding Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery
    Yune, Junchan Joshua
    Siddighi, Sam
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 19 (04): : 225 - 229