A Novel Pathological Prognostic Score (PPS) to Identify "Very High-Risk" Patients: a Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of 506 Patients with High Risk Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)

被引:10
|
作者
Liu, Xuechao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qiu, Haibo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Zhiming [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zhang, Peng [5 ]
Feng, Xingyu [6 ]
Chen, Tao [7 ]
Li, Yong [6 ]
Tao, Kaixiong [5 ]
Li, Guoxin [7 ]
Sun, Xiaowei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Zhiwei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, Dept Gastr Surg, 651 East Dongfeng Rd, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Gen Surg, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Guangdong Gen Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[7] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Pathological prognostic score; Ki-67 labeling index; Mitotic index; Prognosis; ADJUVANT IMATINIB MESYLATE; KI-67; THERAPY; KIT; MANAGEMENT; MUTATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-018-3799-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To determine the better risk stratification based on surgical pathology and to assess the clinical outcomes after curative resection with a new scoring system in high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 506 high-risk GIST patients who underwent curative resection as initial treatment at four centers from 2001 to 2015. Results Multivariate analysis revealed that only Ki-67 labeling index (LI) and mitotic index were independent prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). For the two tumor-related pathological factors, Ki-67 LI > 7% and mitotic index >= 7/50 high power fields were allocated 1 point each. The total score was defined as the Pathological Prognostic Score (PPS). When Ki-67 LI and mitotic index were replaced by PPS, a multivariate analysis still identified PPS as an independent predictor of OS (HR 2.719; 95% CI 1.309-5.650; P = 0.007). Patients with a PPS of 0, 1, or 2 had a 5-year survival of 91.8, 79.8, and 51.0%, respectively (P = 0.001). Furthermore, an elevated PPS (PPS = 2) was associated with larger tumor size, non-stomach tumor, and open resection (all P < 0.05). Conclusion The PPS independently predicted postoperative survival in high-risk GIST, and it might facilitate the selection of appropriate treatment strategy for these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2150 / 2157
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Remarkable prognostic heterogeneity justifies subdividing high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of NIH consensus scheme into two different risk groups
    Li, CF
    Huang, WW
    Lin, CN
    Lu, D
    Huang, HY
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2006, 19 : 112A - 112A
  • [22] Remarkable prognostic heterogeneity justifies subdividing high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of NIH consensus scheme into two different risk groups
    Li, CF
    Huang, WW
    Lin, CN
    Lu, D
    Huang, HY
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2006, 86 : 112A - 112A
  • [23] Tumor necrosis and &gt;20 mitoses per 50 high-power fields can distinguish 'very high-risk' and 'highest-risk' within 'high-risk' gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Zheng, Jiabin
    Li, Renjie
    Qiu, Haibo
    Chen, Tao
    Zhou, Yongjian
    Huang, Changming
    Li, Guoxin
    Zhou, Zhiwei
    Li, Yong
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 (07) : 621 - 629
  • [24] Prognostic Significance of Arterial Stiffness Parameters in the Identification of very High-Risk Patients
    Nosov, A. E.
    Gorbushina, O. YU.
    Vlasova, E. M.
    Alekseyev, V. B.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2020, 60 (10) : 27 - 32
  • [25] Early identification of hepatocellular carcinoma patients at high-risk of recurrence using the ADV score: a multicenter retrospective study
    Cao, Shuya
    Zhou, Zheyu
    Chen, Chaobo
    Li, Wenwen
    Liu, Jinsong
    Xu, Jiawei
    Zhao, Chunlong
    Yuan, Yihang
    Xu, Zhenggang
    Wu, Huaiyu
    Ji, Guwei
    Xu, Xiaoliang
    Wang, Ke
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [26] Novel Prognostic Index of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Simple Summation of Very High-Risk Factors
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Suzuki, Gen
    Masui, Koji
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Shimizu, Daisuke
    Kimoto, Takuya
    Yamada, Kei
    Shiraishi, Takumi
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Okihara, Koji
    Yoshida, Ken
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Okabe, Haruumi
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [27] Prognostic stratification of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of targeted therapy
    Park, Cheol Keun
    Lee, Eui Jin
    Kim, Minji
    Lim, Ho-Yeong
    Choi, Dong Il
    Noh, Jae Hyung
    Sohn, Tae Sung
    Kim, Sung
    Kim, Mi Jung
    Lee, Hun Kyung
    Kim, Kyoung-Mee
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (06) : 1011 - 1018
  • [28] Re-appraisal of the universal definition of tumor rupture among patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors
    Gotohda, Naoto
    Nishida, Toshirou
    Sato, Shinsuke
    Ozaka, Masato
    Nakahara, Yujiro
    Komatsu, Yoshito
    Kondo, Masato
    Cho, Haruhiko
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 7 (06): : 1021 - 1031
  • [29] ASO Author Reflections: How to Identify Patients at Genuinely High Risk of Recurrence from Patients with Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Stomach?
    Holmebakk, Toto
    Boye, Kjetil
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 6846 - 6847
  • [30] Prevalence of residual cardiovascular risk factors in high-risk and very-high-risk patients
    Ferch, Moritz
    Fellinger, Paul
    Kautzky-Willer, Alexandra
    Winhofer, Yvonne
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2023, 135 : S761 - S761