A Megavoltage CT Image Enhancement Method for Image-Guided and Adaptive Helical TomoTherapy

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Yaru [1 ]
Yue, Chenxi [1 ]
Zhu, Jian [2 ,3 ]
Yu, Haining [2 ]
Cheng, Yang [2 ]
Yin, Yong [2 ]
Li, Baosheng [2 ]
Dong, Jiwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jinan, Network Based Intelligent Comp, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Shandong Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Shandong Key Lab Digital Med & Comp Assisted Surg, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2019年 / 9卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
megavoltage CT; image guided radiotherapy; adaptive radiotherapy; tomotherapy; image enhancement; block matching; discriminative feature representation; irradiation dosimetry; RADIOTHERAPY; MVCT;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2019.00362
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To propose a novel method to improve the mega-voltage CT (MVCT) image quality for helical TomoTherapy while maintaining the stability on dose calculation. Materials and Methods: The Block-Matching 3D-transform (BM3D) and Discriminative Feature Representation (DFR) methods were combined into a novel BM3D + DFR method for their respective advantages. A phantom (Catphan504) and three serials of clinical (head & neck, chest, and pelvis) MVCT images from 30 patients were acquired using the helical TomoTherapy system. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and edge detection algorithm (canny) was employed for image quality comparisons between the original and BM3D + DFR enhanced MVCT. A simulated rectangular field of 6 MV X-ray beams were vertically delivered on the original and post-processed MVCT serials of the same CT density phantom, and the dose curves on both serials were compared to test the effects of image enhancement on dose calculation accuracy. Results: In total, 466 transversal MVCT slices were acquired and processed by both BM3D and the proposed BM3D + DFR methods. Compared to the original MVCT image, the BM3D + DFR method presented a remarkable improvement in terms of the soft tissue contrast and noise reduction. For the phantom image, the CNR of the region of interest (ROI) was improved from 1.70 to 4.03. The average CNR of ROIs for 10 patients from each anatomical group, were increased significantly from 1.45 +/- 1.51 to 2.09 +/- 1.68 for the head & neck (p < 0.001), from 0.92 +/- 0.78 to 1.36 +/- 0.85 for the chest (p < 0.001), and from 1.12 +/- 1.22 to 1.76 +/- 1.31 for the pelvis (p < 0.001), respectively. The canny edge detection operator showed that BM3D + DFR provided clearer organ boundaries with less chaos. The root-mean-square of the dosimetry difference on the iso-center passed horizontal dose profile curves and vertical percentage depth dose curves were only 0.09% and 0.06%, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed BM3D + DFR method is feasible to improve the soft tissue contrast for the original MVCT images with coincidence in dose calculation and without compromising resolution. After integration in clinical workflow, the post-processed MVCT may be better applied on image-guided and adaptive helical TomoTherapy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Megavoltage CT image characterization, quality, and enhancement
    Mahan, S
    Ramsey, C
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1939 - 1940
  • [32] In regard to "Setup error analysis in helical tomotherapy based image-guided radiation therapy treatments"
    Yartsev, Slav
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 41 (01) : 71 - 71
  • [33] Image-guided dose-escalated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with helical tomotherapy
    Tomasz Barelkowski
    Peter Wust
    David Kaul
    Sebastian Zschaeck
    Waldemar Wlodarczyk
    Volker Budach
    Pirus Ghadjar
    Marcus Beck
    [J]. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2020, 196 : 229 - 242
  • [34] Helical Tomotherapy (HT): role of Image-guided (IGRT) in treatment of nasopharynx focusing on acute toxicity
    Gueci, M.
    Grillo, A.
    Caminiti, G.
    Evangelista, G.
    Bono, M.
    Sciume, F.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S917 - S917
  • [35] Image-guided dose-escalated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer with helical tomotherapy
    Barelkowski, Tomasz
    Wust, Peter
    Kaul, David
    Zschaeck, Sebastian
    Wlodarczyk, Waldemar
    Budach, Volker
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Beck, Marcus
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2020, 196 (03) : 229 - 242
  • [36] Image-guided helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: Technique and initial clinical obsen,ations
    Ramsey, C.
    Scaperoth, D.
    Seibert, R.
    Chase, D.
    Harris, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2257 - 2258
  • [37] Hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HF-IGRT) cerebral metastases by means of helical Tomotherapy
    Poettgen, C.
    Levegruen, S.
    Abu Jawad, J.
    Wittig, A.
    Hepp, R.
    Gkika, E.
    Grannass, A.
    Gauler, T.
    Eberhardt, W.
    Stuschke, M.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 : 19 - 19
  • [38] Analysis of Intrafractional Organ Motion by Megavoltage Computed Tomography in Patients with Lung Cancer Treated with Image-guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Using Helical Tomotherapy
    Aibe, Norihiro
    Yamazaki, Hideya
    Nishimura, Takuya
    Oota, Yoshitaka
    Iwama, Kazuki
    Nakamura, Satoaki
    Ikeno, Hiroyasu
    Yoshida, Ken
    Okabe, Haruumi
    Yamada, Kei
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (12) : 7383 - 7388
  • [39] Improvement of megavoltage computed tomography image quality for adaptive helical tomotherapy using cycleGAN-based image synthesis with small datasets
    Lee, Dongyeon
    Jeong, Sang Woon
    Kim, Sung Jin
    Cho, Hyosung
    Park, Won
    Han, Youngyih
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (10) : 5593 - 5610
  • [40] Do We Need Daily Image-Guided Radiotherapy by Megavoltage Computed Tomography in Head and Neck Helical Tomotherapy? The Actual Delivered Dose to the Spinal Cord
    Duma, Marciana Nona
    Kampfer, Severin
    Schuster, Tibor
    Aswathanarayana, Nandana
    Fromm, Laura-Sophie
    Molls, Michael
    Andratschke, Nicolaus
    Geinitz, Hans
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (01): : 283 - 288