Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway

被引:85
|
作者
Feschet, Pauline [1 ]
Macombe, Catherine [2 ]
Garrabe, Michel [3 ]
Loeillet, Denis [1 ]
Saez, Adolfo Rolo [4 ]
Benhmad, Francois [3 ]
机构
[1] CIRAD, UPR Syst Prod Bananes, F-34398 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Cemagref Irstea, UMR ITAP ELSA, F-34196 Montpellier 5, France
[3] Univ Montpellier I, UMR Art Dev, F-34960 Montpellier 2, France
[4] CIRAD, UMR SELMET, Stn Ligne Paradis, F-97410 St Pierre, France
来源
关键词
Banana; Cameroon; Health; Pathway; Preston curve; Social LCA; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; CHANGING RELATION; HEALTH; LIFE; MORTALITY; GROWTH; WEALTH; INCOME; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-012-0490-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of the social Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method is to predict the social impacts on people caused by the changes in the functioning of one product chain throughout its life cycle. Changes in health status are very important experiences for people. The aim of this paper is to build a pathway between changes in economic activity generated by the functioning of a product chain and the changes in health status of the population in the country where the economic activity takes place. Empirical and historical factors suggest that increased economic activity through growth in income leads to improvements in the health of a country's population. This empirical relationship is well known in economics as the Preston curve. Using this relationship, we design a pathway for social LCA impact assessment. This pathway may be used to explain or predict the potential impact caused by the modification of one product sector upon the health of a population. The Preston relationship usually is calculated for a cross section of countries. We assess whether the Preston relationship is valid when a single country is considered alone. Drawing from scientific literature regarding development, we define the context where the use of the Preston relationship is justified. We describe the general design of the Preston pathway, using a recalculated (panel based) relationship, and specify the conditions for its use. We apply it to the case of company B, a banana industry in Cameroon, for the period between 2010 and 2030. We highlight that the panel calculation of the Preston relationship remains significant when a country is considered alone. We suggest that the following conditions are required for the pathway to be used: (1) the activity is set within countries where the GDP per capita in purchasing power parity is less than $10,000 at the start of the period, (2) the assessed activity accounts for a significant part of the annual GDP and/or demonstrates obvious signs that it represents a huge stake in the country's economy, (3) the duration of the assessed activity is regular and long enough, and (4) the added value created by the activity is shared within the country. We found that the future activity of company B would improve the potential LEX of the entire population of Cameroon by 5 days over 20 years, based on 200,000 t of bananas exported annually (in comparison with no activity). When the four conditions for use are met, and provided results are interpreted by comparing them with other situations or countries, the recalculated panel-based relationship may be used to explain or predict a change in potential life expectancy generated by a change in economic activity. The Preston pathway may be useful for impact assessment in social LCA. The assessment is valid only when used for a comparative analysis and must be done within a multi-criteria framework. Complementary pathways therefore need to be designed. We suggest that the conditions for use and other research issues be discussed and fine-tuned further. Moreover, we welcome comments and criticisms.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 503
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for regulatory planning
    Zhang, Bingqing
    Su, Shu
    Zhu, Yimin
    Li, Xiaodong
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2020, 83
  • [42] Evaluating options in LCA: The emergence of conflicting paradigms for impact assessment and evaluation
    Notarnicola B.
    Huppes G.
    Van den Berg N.W.
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998, 3 (5) : 289 - 300
  • [43] Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA
    Canals, Llorenc Mila i
    Bauer, Christian
    Depestele, Jochen
    Dubreuil, Alain
    Knuchel, Ruth Freiermuth
    Gaillard, Gerard
    Michelsen, Ottar
    Mueller-Wenk, Ruedi
    Rydgren, Bernt
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (01): : 5 - 15
  • [44] Optimal BIM and LCA integration approach for embodied environmental impact assessment
    Tam, Vivian W. Y.
    Zhou, Yijun
    Shen, Liyin
    Le, Khoa N.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 385
  • [45] Global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA
    Thomas Koellner
    Roland Geyer
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1185 - 1187
  • [46] An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Yimin
    Zhang, Zhihui
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 45 (03) : 766 - 775
  • [47] Data for social LCA
    Catherine Benoît Norris
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 : 261 - 265
  • [48] The Progress of the Impact Assessment Study Committee in the National LCA Project of Japan
    Norihiro Itsubo
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999, 4 (4) : 194 - 194
  • [49] Feasibility of applying site-dependent impact assessment of acidification in LCA
    Bellekom, Sandra
    Potting, Jose
    Benders, Rene
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (06): : 417 - 424
  • [50] Global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA
    Koellner, Thomas
    Geyer, Roland
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (06): : 1185 - 1187