Restoration of microbial residues in soils of the Conservation Reserve Program

被引:54
|
作者
Amelung, W
Kimble, JM
Samson-Liebig, S
Follett, RF
机构
[1] Univ Bayreuth, Inst Soil Sci & Soil Geog, D-95440 Bayreuth, Germany
[2] Nat Resources Conservat Serv, Lincoln, NE 68516 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Ft Collins, CO 80522 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2001.1704
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
To elucidate the role of microorganisms for C and N sequestration in arable soils converted to grassland (sites of the Conservation Reserve Program; CRP), we determined amino sugars as indicators for microbial residues in surface samples (0-5 cm) obtained from each of 10 adjacent native grassland, CRP, and cropland sites across the U.S. Great Plains. The CRP sites were 6 to 10 yr and the cropland sites were > 80 yr old. Compared with native grasslands, the CRP sites had lost between 17 and 50% and the cropland sites between 32 and 94% of their surface soil organic matter (SOM). The C/N ratio was not significantly different among the three land-use systems, indicating that C and N losses occurred at similar intensity. The mean amino sugar concentrations decreased in the order native grassland (70 g kg(-1) C; 750 g kg(-1) N) > CRP (53 g kg(-1) C; 570 g kg(-1) N) > cropland (47 g kg(-1) C; 450 g kg(-1) N). This decrease in the element-normalized concentrations of amino sugars indicated that they responded faster to management than other C or N containing compounds. The response of individual amino sugars related to soil compaction and the temperature regime. We suggest that the resequestration of C and N into the residues of bacteria and fungi requires several years, but as it depends on land use it could be manipulated using, for example, soil decompacting techniques to improve CRP efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1704 / 1709
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism
    Hellerstein, Daniel M.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2017, 63 : 601 - 610
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness of the conservation reserve program: Discussion
    Baerenklau, Kenneth A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 87 (05) : 1256 - 1257
  • [43] Biorefinery feedstock production on Conservation Reserve Program land
    Mapemba, Lawrence D.
    Epplin, Francis M.
    Taliaferro, Charles M.
    Huhnke, Raymond L.
    [J]. REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 29 (02): : 227 - 246
  • [44] ESTIMATING PRODUCER WELFARE EFFECTS OF THE CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM
    CANNING, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH, 1991, 43 (01): : 15 - 21
  • [45] Improving conservation reserve program pine plantations for songbirds
    Drew Lanham, J.
    Ellenberger, Justin E.
    Schweitzer, Sara H.
    [J]. Forest Landowner, 2002, 61 (03): : 16 - 19
  • [47] Slippage in the Conservation Reserve Program or spurious correlation? A rejoinder
    Roberts, MJ
    Bucholz, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (02) : 512 - 514
  • [48] Conservation Reserve Program effects on soil quality indicators
    Karlen, DL
    Rosek, MJ
    Gardner, JC
    Allan, DL
    Alms, MJ
    Bezdicek, DF
    Flock, M
    Huggins, DR
    Miller, BS
    Staben, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1999, 54 (01) : 439 - 444
  • [49] Conservation reserve program cutting the cost of growing timber
    Kelly, Keith
    [J]. Forest Landowner, 1998, 57 (05):
  • [50] The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality
    Becker, Douglas A.
    Maas, Alexander
    Bayham, Jude
    Crooks, James
    [J]. GEOHEALTH, 2022, 6 (10):