Sustainability evaluation of automatic and conventional milking systems on organic dairy farms in Denmark

被引:17
|
作者
Oudshoorn, F. W. [1 ]
Kristensen, T. [1 ]
van der Zijpp, A. J. [2 ]
de Boer, I. J. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Fac Agr Sci, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Wageningen Univ, Wageningen Inst Anim Sci, Anim Prod Syst Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Organic dairy farming; Automatic milking system; Sustainability indicators; Grazing; EGG-PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; INDICATORS; COWS; MANAGEMENT; FREQUENCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.njas.2011.05.003
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Organic dairy farmers in Denmark currently are implementing automatic milking systems (AMS) to save labour costs. As organic agriculture aims at sustainable production, the introduction of a new technology such as AMS should be evaluated regarding its economic viability, environmental impact, and social acceptability, i.e., its contribution to sustainable development. The objective of this research, therefore, was to evaluate sustainability of AMS use on organic dairy farms in Denmark, by comparing results of a set of sustainability indicators for nine farms using AMS with nine farms using conventional milking systems (CMS). Sustainability indicators were quantified for economic performance of the farm, on-farm eutrophication, on-farm biodiversity, animal welfare (including health), grazing time, milk composition and labour time. Milk yield per cow per year was higher for AMS farms (9021 kg energy corrected milk ECMI per cow per year) than for CMS farms (7664 kg ECM), but did not result in a higher net profit or gross margin per cow for AMS farms. Nitrogen surplus per hectare of available land was higher for AMS farms (110 kg N ha(-1)) than for CMS farms (66 kg N ha(-1)). This difference was not due to the use of AMS but was caused by a higher export of manure by the CMS farms. The number of veterinary treatments per cow per year was unaffected by AMS use. but culling rate was higher for the AMS farms (38%) than for the CMS farms (32%). There was no difference between the AMS and CMS farms in milk composition indicators such as somatic cell count, clostridium spores, and urea. The acid degree value (ADV), measuring free fatty acids (FFA) in the milk, was higher in the milk from the AMS farms (0.78 meq I-1) compared with the CMS farms (0.49 meq I-1). Labour time measured in hours of work per dairy cow per day, was only half for the AMS compared with the CMS users; i.e., 2.3 min per cow per day. Grass intake by grazing as percentage of total feed intake was reduced by AMS (5.1 kg DM per cow per day for the AMS farms against 6.8 kg DM per cow per day for the CMS farms). From this quantification of selected sustainability indicators it can be concluded that organic dairy farms using AMS, in spite of the substantial decrease in grazing time, show the potential of economic and environmental sustainable development within the range of herd sizes investigated (65-157 cows per farm). Even though the lower number of grazing hours per cow per year on the AMS farms did not affect indicator scores for animal health or milk quality, this reduction in grazing hours might be a problem for consumers to accept AMS use. (C) 2011 Royal Netherlands Society for Agricultural Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 33
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Management of mastitis on organic and conventional dairy farms
    Ruegg, P. L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 87 (13) : 43 - 55
  • [22] Stress responses during milking; Comparing conventional and automatic milking in primiparous dairy cows
    Hopster, H
    Bruckmaier, RM
    Van der Werf, JTN
    Korte, SM
    Macuhova, J
    Korte-Bouws, G
    van Reenen, CG
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2002, 85 (12) : 3206 - 3216
  • [23] Economical sensitivity of four main parameters defining the room for investment of automatic milking systems on dairy farms
    Arendzen, I
    van Scheppingen, ATJ
    ROBOTIC MILKING, 2000, : 201 - 211
  • [24] Application of (German) Milk Ordinance in dairy farms with automatic milking systems - Discussion of special solutions for conflicts
    Reichmuth, J
    Knappstein, K
    KIELER MILCHWIRTSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNGSBERICHTE, 1999, 51 (03): : 237 - 252
  • [25] OPTIMIZATION OF CHOOSING AND EVALUATION OF MILKING PARLOURS FOR DAIRY FARMS IN LATVIA
    Kic, Pavel
    Aboltins, Aivars
    Priekulis, Juris
    15TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 31 - 36
  • [26] Long-term variability of bulk milk somatic cell and bacterial counts associated with dairy farms moving from conventional to automatic milking systems
    Castro, Angel
    Pereira, Jose M.
    Amiama, Carlos
    Barrasa, Martin
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 17 (01) : 218 - 225
  • [27] Investment appraisal of automatic milking and conventional milking technologies in a pasture-based dairy system
    Shortall, J.
    Shalloo, L.
    Foley, C.
    Sleator, R. D.
    O'Brien, B.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (09) : 7700 - 7713
  • [28] EFFECT OF COW TRAFFIC TYPE ON AUTOMATIC MILKING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IN DAIRY FARMS
    Unal, H.
    Kuraloglu, H.
    Koyuncu, M.
    Alibas, K.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 2017, 27 (05): : 1454 - 1463
  • [29] Typologies of dairy farms with automatic milking system in northwest Spain and farmers' satisfaction
    Castro, Angel
    Pereira, Jose M.
    Amiama, Carlos
    Bueno, Javier
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 14 (02) : 207 - 219
  • [30] Economic impact of introducing automatic milking system on Canadian dairy farms.
    Ferland, J.
    Vasseur, E.
    Duplessis, M.
    Pajor, E. A.
    Pellerin, D.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 600 - 601