UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY: BLOCK TRIANGULATION COMPARISONS

被引:0
|
作者
Gini, Rossana [1 ]
Pagliari, Diana [2 ]
Passoni, Daniele [2 ]
Pinto, Livio [2 ]
Sona, Giovanna [1 ]
Dosso, Paolo [3 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, DICA, Geomat Lab, I-22100 Como, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, DICA, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[3] Studio Ingn Terradat, I-20037 Paderno Dugnano, Italy
来源
UAV-G2013 | 2013年
关键词
Aerial Triangulation; Software Comparison; UAV; DEM; Point cloud;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
UAVs systems represent a flexible technology able to collect a big amount of high resolution information, both for metric and interpretation uses. In the frame of experimental tests carried out at Dept. ICA of Politecnico di Milano to validate vector-sensor systems and to assess metric accuracies of images acquired by UAVs, a block of photos taken by a fixed wing system is triangulated with several software. The test field is a rural area included in an Italian Park ("Parco Adda Nord"), useful to study flight and imagery performances on buildings, roads, cultivated and uncultivated vegetation. The UAV SenseFly, equipped with a camera Canon Ixus 220HS, flew autonomously over the area at a height of 130 m yielding a block of 49 images divided in 5 strips. Sixteen pre-signalized Ground Control Points, surveyed in the area through GPS (NRTK survey), allowed the referencing of the block and accuracy analyses. Approximate values for exterior orientation parameters (positions and attitudes) were recorded by the flight control system. The block was processed with several software: Erdas-LPS, EyeDEA (Univ. of Parma), Agisoft Photoscan, Pix4UAV, in assisted or automatic way. Results comparisons are given in terms of differences among digital surface models, differences in orientation parameters and accuracies, when available. Moreover, image and ground point coordinates obtained by the various software were independently used as initial values in a comparative adjustment made by scientific in-house software, which can apply constraints to evaluate the effectiveness of different methods of point extraction and accuracies on ground check points.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 162
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] UAV linear photogrammetry
    Tournadre, V.
    Pierrot-Deseilligny, M.
    Faure, P. H.
    ISPRS GEOSPATIAL WEEK 2015, 2015, 40-3 (W3): : 327 - 333
  • [2] Slope Structural Plane Measurement and Block Stability Analysis Based on UAV Photogrammetry
    Zhu C.-J.
    Wang S.-H.
    Ren Y.-P.
    Sun Z.-H.
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2019, 40 (11): : 1636 - 1640and1647
  • [3] UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY IN FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY
    Mirijovsky, Jakub
    Vavra, Ales
    12TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC GEOCONFERENCE, SGEM 2012, VOL. II, 2012, : 909 - 916
  • [4] Prediction method of surface subsidence induced by block caving method based on UAV oblique photogrammetry
    Ling, Weijia
    Feng, Xinglong
    Wang, Liguan
    Zhu, Zhonghua
    Wang, Shiwen
    Fu, Haiying
    Zhang, Shuwen
    Zhao, Ying
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] THE RELIABILITY OF BLOCK TRIANGULATION
    FORSTNER, W
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1985, 51 (08): : 1137 - 1149
  • [6] BLOCK TRIANGULATION BY INTERSECTIONS
    SHMUTTER, B
    PERLMUTER, A
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIA, 1979, 35 (03): : 93 - 99
  • [7] UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY TECHNIQUES FOR PRECISION AGRICULTURE
    Raeva, Paulina
    Sedina, Jaroslav
    Dlesk, Adam
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CARTOGRAPHY AND GIS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2018, : 842 - 856
  • [8] Estimating the Rut Depth by UAV Photogrammetry
    Nevalainen, Paavo
    Salmivaara, Aura
    Ala-Ilomaki, Jari
    Launiainen, Samuli
    Hiedanpaa, Juuso
    Finer, Leena
    Pahikkala, Tapio
    Heikkonen, Jukka
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (12)
  • [9] DEM Generation Based On UAV Photogrammetry
    Mokrane, Adel
    Choukchou-Braham, Amal
    Cherki, Brahim
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICAEE), 2019,
  • [10] UAV PHOTOGRAMMETRY FOR ROAD SURFACE MODELLING
    Ruzgiene, Birute
    Aksamitauskas, Ceslovas
    Daugela, Ignas
    Prokopimas, Sarunas
    Puodziukas, Virgaudas
    Rekus, Donatas
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF ROAD AND BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 10 (02): : 151 - 158