Pharmacological treatments for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction-a systematic review and indirect comparison

被引:35
|
作者
Bonsu, Kwadwo Osei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arunmanakul, Poukwan [4 ]
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Practice, Coll Hlth Sci, Kumasi, Ghana
[2] Komfo Anokye Teaching Hosp, Dept Pharm, Emergency Med Directorate, Kumasi, Ghana
[3] Monash Univ Malaysia, Jeffrey Cheah Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
[4] Chiang Mai Univ, Pharmaceut Care Dept, Fac Pharm, Chiang Mai, Thailand
[5] Monash Univ Malaysia, Asian Ctr Evidence Synth Populat Implementat & Cl, Hlth & Well Being Cluster, Global Asia 21st Century Platform GA21, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
[6] Monash Univ Malaysia, Sch Pharm, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia
[7] Naresuan Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Practice, Ctr Pharmaceut Outcomes Res, Phitsanulok, Thailand
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, 425 N Charter St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Heart failure; Preserved ejection fraction; Pharmacological treatment; Meta-analysis; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; ALDOSTERONE ANTAGONISM; NETWORK METAANALYSIS; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; SYSTOLIC FUNCTION; ELDERLY PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; TASK-FORCE; DIAGNOSIS; SPIRONOLACTONE;
D O I
10.1007/s10741-018-9679-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Pharmacological interventions for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have failed to reduce mortality and hospitalization. Evidence for mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRAs), beta-adrenoceptor blockers (beta-blockers), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs)-to reduce clinical outcomes in HFpEF remains unclear. We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmacological treatments in HFpEF diagnosed according the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2016 guidelines from inception to August, 2017. The study outcomes were mortality, hospitalization, changes in indexes of cardiac structure and function, biomarkers, and indexes of functional capacity-quality of life (QoL) assessment and 6-min walk distance test (6-MWD). The random-effects models were used to estimate pooled relative risks (RRs) for the binary outcomes and standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes, with 95% CI. A network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was employed to estimate the comparative efficacy of treatments. We included data from 15 RCTs comprising 5930 patients. There was no significant effect seen with all treatments compared with placebo and comparative efficacy of any two treatments on all outcomes assessed. However, mineralocorticoid antagonist spironolactone demonstrated a trend towards reducing mortality compared with placebo (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79-1.08), sildenafil (0.14; 0.01-2.78), perindopril (0.87; 0.59-1.28), and eplerenone (0.91; 0.25-3.33). Similar trends in treatment effect were observed with spironolactone on surrogate outcomes while eplerenone demonstrated a trend of superior effect in reduction of hospitalizations compared with all other drug treatment. No drug treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvement in clinical and surrogate outcomes in HFpEF diagnosed according to the ESC 2016 guideline. Spironolactone and eplerenone showed clinically relevant reduction in mortality and hospitalization respectively compared with other drug treatments. Further trials with MRAs are warranted to confirm treatment effects in HFpEF.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 156
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Marzia Rigolli
    Gillian A Whalley
    [J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology., 2013, 10 (04) - 376
  • [32] Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Dalzell, Jonathan R.
    McDowell, Kirsty M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (09): : 896 - 896
  • [33] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Gladden, James D.
    Linke, Wolfgang A.
    Redfield, Margaret M.
    [J]. PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 466 (06): : 1037 - 1053
  • [34] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Harper, Andrew R.
    Patel, Hitesh C.
    Lyon, Alexander R.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 18 (02) : S24 - S29
  • [35] Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction
    Warriner, D. R.
    Morris, P. D.
    Saraf, K.
    Al-Mohammad, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2013, 74 (02) : C26 - C30
  • [36] Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Reddy, Yogesh N. V.
    Borlaug, Barry A.
    [J]. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (04) : 145 - 188
  • [37] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    James D. Gladden
    Wolfgang A. Linke
    Margaret M. Redfield
    [J]. Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, 2014, 466 : 1037 - 1053
  • [38] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Galinier, Michel
    [J]. PRESSE MEDICALE, 2008, 37 (7-8): : 1121 - 1131
  • [39] Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Alsamara, Mershed
    Alharethi, Rami
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2014, 12 (06) : 743 - 750
  • [40] Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Mitchell, Michelle
    [J]. CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS, 2019, 7 (04) : 184 - 188