The prospects for coal-fired power generation in Saudi Arabia

被引:14
|
作者
Matar, Walid [1 ]
Echeverri, Rodrigo [1 ]
Pierru, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdullah Petr Studies & Res Ctr KAPSARC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Coal; Saudi Arabia; MCP; Energy model; Electricity;
D O I
10.1016/j.esr.2016.10.004
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Almost all of Saudi Arabia's electric power generation is fueled by oil and gas. Plans for future capacity envisage nuclear and renewables supplementing this mix and thereby freeing up oil for other revenue-generating opportunities. Coal-fired generation has been promoted in some Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries but not, so far, in the Kingdom. Our analysis finds that: Imported coal would provide lower cost generation than either solar or nuclear power in the near-term. At current administered prices of oil and gas, other resources of energy such as solar, nuclear, or imported coal are not competitive for power generation. If decisions were made based on deregulated oil and gas prices: At the reference coal price, only moderate levels of coal-fired capacity would be introduced. Having remaining capacity comprised of nuclear and solar would result in lower Saudi CO2 emissions from power generation than under a 'business-as-usual' scenario. At the low coal price, CO2 emissions in 2030 cannot be maintained at their current level since coal, rather than solar and nuclear, is used to displace oil and gas from the generation fuel mix. Some forecasts of coal markets anticipate significant increases in real export prices, which would make coal-fired power generation unattractive compared to nuclear power. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 190
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modelling and prediction of NOx emission in a coal-fired power generation plant
    Li, K
    Thompson, S
    Peng, JX
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2004, 12 (06) : 707 - 723
  • [42] Determining the Environmental Impact of Cradle to Gate in Coal-Fired Power Generation
    Triatmojo, Pramudita
    Hadinata, Febrian
    Sari, Tuti Indah
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2024, 18 (05) : 195 - 205
  • [43] Modern coal-fired power plants
    Scheffknecht, G
    Stamatelopoulos, GN
    Lorey, H
    [J]. BWK, 2002, 54 (06): : 46 - +
  • [44] Study on the performance evaluation index for a coal-fired power generation unit
    Yang, Yongping
    Liu, Tong
    Guo, Minchen
    Liu, Wenyi
    [J]. Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2000, 20 (02): : 56 - 60
  • [45] A NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS IN COAL-FIRED POWER-GENERATION
    HARRISON, C
    ZERA, C
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 1990, 94 (04) : 33 - 36
  • [46] Economic and environmental assessment of biomass coupled coal-fired power generation
    Yun, Huimin
    Dai, Jianjun
    Li, Hui
    Bi, Xiaotao
    [J]. Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2021, 72 (12): : 6311 - 6327
  • [47] Advanced coal-fired power plants
    Ruth, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (01): : 4 - 9
  • [48] Is China returning to coal-fired power?
    Heubl, Ben
    [J]. Engineering and Technology, 2019, 14 (04): : 20 - 23
  • [49] Coal-Fired Power Plants Alternative Petcoke Fired Power Plants
    Ozcelik, Ozlem
    Boran, Kurtulus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2016, 19 (04): : 531 - 535
  • [50] Coal-Fired Generation Cost and Performance Trends
    Probasco, Dale
    Ruhlman, Bob
    [J]. POWER, 2011, 155 (05) : 66 - 69