Assessment of myocardial viability using echocardiographic strain imaging in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiac PET imaging

被引:3
|
作者
Sharma, Ambudhar [1 ]
Sood, Ashwani [2 ]
Mittal, Bhagwant Rai [2 ]
Vijayvergiya, Rajesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Cardiol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Nucl Med, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
Acute myocardial infarction; Dobutamine stress echocardiography; Echocardiographic strain imaging; Myocardial viability; Speckle tracking echocardiographic; SPECKLE TRACKING ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; ULTRASONIC PIXEL TRACKING; STANDARD; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s12574-020-00476-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background A speckle tracking echocardiographic (STE) strain imaging can predict myocardial viability. The study compared the STE strain imaging using low-dose dobutamine stress with(18)fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomographic ((18)FDG-PET) imaging for the detection of myocardium viability. Methods We studied 57 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) having angiographic evidence of total arterial cut off and akinetic myocardium. These patients underwent low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and(18)FDG-PET imaging. The STE was used to measure the peak systolic longitudinal and circumferential strain and strain rate at rest and after low-dose dobutamine stress. Results A total of 298 akinetic segments were evaluated. The viable myocardium showed an increased strain and strain rate values following the dobutamine stress in comparison to the nonviable myocardium. The peak longitudinal strain rate [AUC 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.99],p = 0.001; optimal cutoff - 0.64 s(-1)for sensitivity 0.87 and specificity 0.81), post-dobutamine peak longitudinal strain rate [AUC 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-1.00),p = 0.001; optimal cutoff - 0.85 s(-1)for sensitivity 0.89 and specificity 0.77), change in peak longitudinal strain rate [AUC 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1),p = 0.001; optimal cutoff - 0.2 s(-1)for sensitivity 0.87 and specificity 0.87] predicted viability. The post-dobutamine peak circumferential strain rate [AUC 0.92 (95% CI 0.81-1.0),p = 0.001; optimal cutoff - 1.1 s(-1)for sensitivity and specificity 0.86], were predictor of viability. Both resting and post-dobutamine longitudinal and circumferential strain rate had better accuracy for the prediction of viability. Conclusions The resting and post-dobutamine stress STE strain and strain rate parameters can assess the viability in akinetic segments.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 252
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ST-elevation no myocardial infarction
    Peter Damman
    Robbert J. de Winter
    Mitchell W. Krucoff
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2017, 43 : 426 - 427
  • [22] ST-elevation no myocardial infarction
    Damman, Peter
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Krucoff, Mitchell W.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2017, 43 (03) : 426 - 427
  • [23] Echocardiographic strain imaging for myocardial viability - An improvement over visual assessment?
    Gorcsan, J
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (25) : 3820 - 3822
  • [24] Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction
    Reindl, M.
    Tiller, C.
    Lechner, I.
    Holzknecht, M.
    Perez, R.
    Mayr, A.
    Brenner, C.
    Klug, G.
    Bauer, A.
    Metzler, B.
    Reinstadler, S.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2020, 132 : S169 - S169
  • [25] Neopterin in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Tavlueva, E.
    Barbarash, O.
    Barbarash, L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 12 (0F) : F110 - F111
  • [26] Focal myocarditis mimicking acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction - Diagnosis using cardiac magnetic resonance Imaging
    Testani, Jeffrey M.
    Kolansky, Daniel M.
    Litt, Harold
    Gerstenfeld, Edward R.
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2006, 33 (02) : 256 - 259
  • [27] ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANCIES
    Luboyatnikova, E. S.
    Kiselev, A. R.
    Komarova, M., V
    Rodionova, V. A.
    Kapp, E., V
    Duplyakov, D., V
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2018, 58 (12) : 5 - 12
  • [28] Bivalirudin for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Dwivedi, Girish
    Steed, Richard
    Chong, Aun Yeong
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9807): : 1915 - 1915
  • [29] Impact of direct stenting on myocardial injury assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and prognosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Saad, Mohammed
    Stiermaier, Thomas
    Fuernau, Georg
    Thiele, T. Suzanne de-Waha
    Desch, Steffen
    Thiele, Holger
    Eitel, Ingo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B154 - B154
  • [30] Cardiac Metastasis Presenting as ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Lewis Jr, Michael J.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (11)