The Leukocyte Esterase Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Not Affected by Prior Antibiotic Administration

被引:2
|
作者
Shahi, Alisina [1 ]
Alvand, Abtin [1 ,2 ]
Ghanem, Elie [1 ,3 ]
Restrepo, Camilo [1 ]
Parvizi, Javad [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Inst, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, NDORMS, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
关键词
ALPHA-DEFENSIN TEST; STRIP TEST; REAGENT STRIPS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; RAPID DIAGNOSIS; HIP; RISK; SONICATION; MORTALITY; UTILITY;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.18.00615
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It has been demonstrated that administration of antibiotics prior to performing diagnostic testing for periprosthetic joint infection can interfere with the accuracy of the standard diagnostic tests. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of antibiotic administration prior to performing the synovial leukocyte esterase strip test for periprosthetic joint infection. Methods: We identified 121 patients who underwent revision hip or knee arthroplasty for a Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS)-confirmed periprosthetic joint infection. All patients also had a leukocyte esterase strip test performed. Patients in one group (32%) took antibiotics prior to the diagnostic workup, whereas patients in another group (68%) did not receive antibiotics within 2 weeks of the diagnostic workup. The leukocyte esterase strip test, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), synovial white blood-cell (WBC) count, and polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) percentage were collected and were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The median serum ESR (85 compared with 67 mm/hr for patients who did not and did receive antibiotics; p = 0.009), CRP (16.5 compared with 12.9 mg/L; p = 0.032), synovial WBC count (45,675 compared with 9,650 cells/mu L; p < 0.0001), and PMN percentage (93% compared with 88%; p = 0.004) were all significantly lower for patients receiving antibiotics. Furthermore, the administration of antibiotics resulted in a significant decrease in the sensitivity of all tests, except leukocyte esterase: ESR (79.5% in the antibiotics cohort compared with 92.7% in the no-antibiotics cohort [relative risk (RR) for false-negative results, 2.8; p = 0.04]), CRP (64.2% compared with 81.8% [RR, 1.9; p = 0.03]), WBC count (69.3% compared with 93.4% [RR, 5.0; p = 0.001]), PMN percentage (74.4% compared with 91.5% [RR, 3.0; p = 0.01]), and leukocyte esterase (78% compared with 83% [RR, 1.6; p = 0.17]). The rate of negative cultures was higher in the antibiotics group at 30.7% compared with the no-antibiotics group at 12.1% (p = 0.015). Conclusions: This current study and previous studies have demonstrated that the administration of premature antibiotics can compromise the results of standard diagnostic tests for periprosthetic joint infection, causing significant increases in false-negative results. However, in this study, the leukocyte esterase strip test maintained its performance even in the setting of antibiotic administration. Antibiotic administration prior to diagnostic workups for periprosthetic joint infection stands to interfere with diagnosis. The leukocyte esterase strip test can be used as a reliable diagnostic marker for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection even when prior antibiotics are administered.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 744
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Leukocyte Esterase Testing on Synovial Fluid as an Adjunct for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection
    Barker, Jared
    Fader, Robert
    Koss, William
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 140 : 46 - 46
  • [32] Application of leukocyte esterase strip test in the screening of periprosthetic joint infections and prospects of high-precision strips
    Zheng, Qing-Yuan
    Zhang, Guo-Qiang
    ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 2 (01)
  • [33] Application of leukocyte esterase strip test in the screening of periprosthetic joint infections and prospects of high-precision strips
    Qing-Yuan Zheng
    Guo-Qiang Zhang
    Arthroplasty, 2
  • [34] Alpha-defensin does not provide additional benefit over leukocyte esterase in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection
    Shohat, Noam
    Yacovelli, Steven
    Chisari, Emanuele
    Clarkson, Samuel
    Mann, Derek
    Parvizi, Javad
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 21 (08) : 845 - 849
  • [35] CORR Insights®: What Is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Alpha-Defensin and Leukocyte Esterase Test in Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection?
    Pearl, Michael L.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 477 (07) : 1719 - 1721
  • [36] Antibiotic Spacers for Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review
    Namdari, Surena
    Sudah, Suleiman Y.
    Menendez, Mariano E.
    Denard, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (19) : 917 - 924
  • [37] Leukocyte Esterase Strip Quantitative Detection Based on RGB Photometry is a Probable Method to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Exploratory Study
    Zheng, Qing-yuan
    Ren, Peng
    Cheng, Long
    Liu, Hao
    Zhao, Runkai
    Lv, Yicun
    Geng, Zongjie
    Lu, Kuan
    Ni, Ming
    Zhang, Guo-qiang
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (04) : 983 - 992
  • [38] Diagnostic Accuracy for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Does Not Improve by a Combined Use of Glucose and Leukocyte Esterase Strip Reading as Diagnostic Parameters
    Haertle, Marco
    Kolbeck, Louisa
    Macke, Christian
    Graulich, Tilman
    Stauss, Ricarda
    Omar, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (11)
  • [39] Antibiotic Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Wouthuyzen-Bakker, Marjan
    Lora-Tamayo, Jaime
    Soriano, Alex
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 70 (06) : 1259 - 1260
  • [40] Viewpoint: Periprosthetic joint infection and dental antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines
    Zhou, Miao Xian
    Berbari, Elie F.
    Couch, Cory G.
    Gruwell, Scott F.
    Carr, Alan B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT INFECTION, 2021, 6 (08) : 363 - 366