Process Fault Diagnosis Method Based on MSPC and LiNGAM and its Application to Tennessee Eastman Process

被引:7
|
作者
Uchida, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Fujiwara, Koichi [1 ]
Saito, Tatsuki [1 ]
Osaka, Taketsugu [2 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Dept Mat Proc Engn, Nagoya, Aichi 4648601, Japan
[2] Kobe Steel, Kobe Corp Res Labs, Kobe, Hyogo 6512271, Japan
来源
IFAC PAPERSONLINE | 2022年 / 55卷 / 02期
关键词
Fault detection; diagnosis; Multivariate statistical process control; Linear non-Gaussian acyclic model; Causal inference; Contribution plot; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.04.224
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a new fault diagnosis method that combines Multivariate statistical process control (MSPC) and a linear non-gaussian acyclic model (LiNGAM), referred to as MSPC-LiNGAM. MSPC is a widely adopted process monitoring method based on principal component analysis (PCA). In MSPC, T-2 and Q statistics are used as monitoring indexes for fault detection. Contribution plots based on T-2 and Q statistics have been proposed for fault diagnosis. However, contribution plots do not always appropriately diagnose causes of faults. In this study, a new fault diagnosis method based on MSPC and a Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model (LiNGAM) is proposed. In the proposed method, referred to as MSPC-LiNGAM, the causality among the T-2 or Q statistic in addition to process variables is calculated by LiNGAM without prior knowledge of processes, and process variables that have the strength of causality to the T-2 or Q statistic are identified as candidates of the causes of the fault. The proposed MSPC-LiNGAM was applied to a simulation data of the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process. The result showed that the proposed method appropriately diagnosed faults even when the conventional contribution plots did not correctly identify causes of faults.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 389
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fault Detection and Diagnosis in the Tennessee Eastman Process Using Interpretable Knowledge Discovery
    Ragab, Ahmed
    El-Koujok, Mohamed
    Amazouz, Mouloud
    Yacout, Soumaya
    2017 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2017,
  • [22] Fault Diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman Process with XGB-AVSSA-KELM Algorithm
    Hu, Mingfei
    Hu, Xinyi
    Deng, Zhenzhou
    Tu, Bing
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (09)
  • [23] Cognitive fault diagnosis in Tennessee Eastman Process using learning in the model space
    Chen, Huanhuan
    Tino, Peter
    Yao, Xin
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 67 : 33 - 42
  • [24] Cascade Feature Selection and ELM for automatic fault diagnosis of the Tennessee Eastman process
    Boldt, Francisco de Assis
    Rauber, Thomas W.
    Varejao, Flavio M.
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2017, 239 : 238 - 248
  • [25] Fault diagnosis of Tennessee Eastman process using signal geometry matching technique
    Li, Han
    Xiao, De-yun
    EURASIP JOURNAL ON ADVANCES IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011,
  • [26] Fault detection of Tennessee Eastman process based on topological features and SVM
    Zhao, Huiyang
    Hu, Yanzhu
    Ai, Xinbo
    Hu, Yu
    Meng, Zhen
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS (ICMES 2017), 2018, 339
  • [27] A NOVEL SCHEME FOR MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL FAULT DETECTION WITH APPLICATION TO THE TENNESSEE EASTMAN PROCESS
    Xu, Nana
    Sun, Jun
    Liu, Jingjing
    Xiu, Xianchao
    MATHEMATICAL FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTING, 2021, 4 (03): : 167 - 184
  • [28] Fault classification on Tennessee Eastman process: PCA and SVM
    Jing, Chen
    Gao, Xin
    Zhu, Xiangping
    Lang, Shuangqing
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND CONTROL (ICMC), 2014, : 2194 - 2197
  • [29] Designing a hierarchical neural network based on fuzzy clustering for fault diagnosis of the Tennessee-Eastman process
    Eslamloueyan, Reza
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (01) : 1407 - 1415
  • [30] A Time Window based Two-Dimensional PCA for Process Monitoring and Its Application to Tennessee Eastman Process
    Yuan, Xiaofeng
    Wang, Di
    Wang, Yalin
    Shao, Weiming
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE 9TH DATA DRIVEN CONTROL AND LEARNING SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DDCLS'20), 2020, : 1364 - 1369