Economic Effects of Environmental Pollution Tax on the Wheat Market

被引:0
|
作者
Alamdarlo, H. Najafi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
Dynamic spatial price equilibrium; Environmental tax; Input distance function; Wheat Market; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM-ANALYSIS; ENERGY POLICIES; FOOD-PRODUCTION; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; MODEL; CHAIN; TRANSPORTATION; AGRICULTURE; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Control of environmental impacts which remain from agricultural activities is always a concern for communities. In Iran, wheat transportation takes place on roads that are dependent on fossil fuels and results in the release of a large amount of carbon dioxide. Accordingly, applying control policies for internalization of the external effects of releasing these pollutants seems necessary. One way to control this type of pollution is the use of tax instruments. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the economic effects of pollution tax on wheat market actors. This tax is proportional to the shadow value of pollution that happens due to energy consumption in the distribution sector. For this purpose, a Dynamic Spatial Equilibrium Model has been used to model the wheat market and Input Distance Function has been used to estimate carbon dioxide emission tax. The results showed that application of the tax payment policy would reduce wheat trade in the country by about 24 percent, while only 16.2 percent of the wheat price was considered as tax. Therefore, carbon dioxide emission will be significantly reduced. On the other hand, due to increased transportation costs, economic surplus for customer declined and economic surplus for producers and government revenues increased. Hence, internalization of the external effects of carbon dioxide emission will increase the welfare of the society.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 516
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Market segmentation, resource misallocation and environmental pollution
    Bian, Yuanchao
    Song, Kaiyi
    Bai, Junhong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 228 : 376 - 387
  • [32] Pollution Trading Permits as a Form of Market Socialism and the Search for a Real Market Solution to Environmental Pollution
    Block, Walter E.
    Mcgee, Robert W.
    EKONOMICHESKAYA POLITIKA, 2007, (02): : 151 - 178
  • [33] Evaluation and comparison of energy tax, resource tax and air pollution tax: an environmental-DSGE model
    Xiao, Bowen
    Guo, Xiaodan
    Xu, Fangqiu
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 67 (12) : 3051 - 3074
  • [34] The Economic Cost of a Carbon Tax on the Personal Computer Market
    Corrigan, Kiara
    Shah, Amip
    Patel, Chandrakant
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2010,
  • [35] Effects of a policy mix of uniform or unilateral environmental tax and trade liberalization on economic welfare
    Hamaguchi, Yoshihiro
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [36] THE ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF A CARBON TAX IN SOUTH AFRICA: A DYNAMIC CGE MODELLING APPROACH
    van Heerden, Jan
    Blignaut, James
    Bohlmann, Heinrich
    Cartwright, Anton
    Diederichs, Nicci
    Mander, Myles
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, 2016, 19 (05) : 714 - 732
  • [37] The Role of Environmental Tax in Alleviating the Impact of Environmental Pollution on Residents' Happiness in China
    Liu, Yu
    Li, Rong-Lin
    Song, Yang
    Zhang, Zhi-Jiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (22)
  • [38] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT - REGRESSIVE TAX OR VALID MARKET - COMMENT
    TUZSON, J
    TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 1975, 77 (03): : 65 - 65
  • [39] Assessment of Environmental and Economic Damage from Radioactive Environmental Pollution
    Kryshev, I. I.
    Buryakova, A. A.
    Sazykina, T. G.
    BIOLOGY BULLETIN, 2021, 48 (12) : 2193 - 2200
  • [40] Assessment of Environmental and Economic Damage from Radioactive Environmental Pollution
    I. I. Kryshev
    A. A. Buryakova
    T. G. Sazykina
    Biology Bulletin, 2021, 48 : 2193 - 2200