Three-class Motor Imagery Classification Based on FBCSP Combined with Voting Mechanism

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Bo [1 ]
Yang, Banghua [2 ]
Guan, Cuntai [3 ]
Hu, Chenxiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ China, Dept Automat, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Res Ctr Brain Comp Engn, Sch Mechatron Engn & Automat, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, 50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
FBCSP; motor imagery; three-class classification; voting mechanism; SINGLE-TRIAL EEG;
D O I
10.1109/civemsa45640.2019.9071618
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) is an effective algorithm in constructing optimal spatial filters, which is widely used to discriminate two classes of electroencephalogram (EEG) signal in Motor Imagery (MI) based Brain Computer Interface (BCI). To extend CSP algorithm to three-class motor imagery of left-hand, right-hand, both-feet, in this paper a three-class classification strategy based on Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) and voting mechanism is proposed. The strategy reduces a three-class problem to two binary-class problems. Two binary-class classifiers are constructed for the three-class Classification, both-hands vs both-feet and left-hand vs right-hand. The result shows an average three-class classification accuracy of 68.6% with BCI competition IV Datasets 2a, which is an encouraging result in motor imagery pattern recognition. And demonstrated that both-hands can be considered as one class in MI based BCI system.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 52
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Classification of EEG Motor imagery multi class signals based on Cross Correlation
    Krishna, D. Hari
    Pasha, I. A.
    Savithri, T. Satya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING AND SECURITY (CMS 2016), 2016, 85 : 490 - 495
  • [32] AdaptiveNFC for Classification of Two Class Motor Imagery Task
    Suraj
    Sinha, Akesh Kumar
    Ghosh, Subhojit
    [J]. 2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER, CONTROL & EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (ICPCES), 2017,
  • [33] Ensemble coupled convolution network for three-class brain tumor grade classification
    Isunuri, Bala Venkateswarlu
    Kakarla, Jagadeesh
    [J]. MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 83 (19) : 57643 - 57659
  • [34] Effect of Extensive Training Load on the Classification Accuracy for a Three Class Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface
    Zaky, M. H.
    Khedr, M. E.
    Nasser, A. A.
    [J]. 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS (ACTEA), 2016, : 211 - 215
  • [35] Analysis of proposed three-class classification decision rules in terms of the ideal observer decision
    Edwards, Darrin C.
    Metz, Charles E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 50 (05) : 478 - 487
  • [36] Classification of Four Class Motor Imagery for Brain Computer Interface
    Abdalsalam, Eltaf
    Yusoff, Mohd Zuki
    Kamel, Nidal
    Malik, Aamir Saeed
    Mahmoud, Dalia
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTIC, VISION, SIGNAL PROCESSING AND POWER APPLICATIONS: EMPOWERING RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2017, 398 : 297 - 305
  • [37] ClusROC: An R Package for ROC Analysis in Three-Class Classification Problems for Clustered Data
    Duc-Khanh To
    Adimari, Gianfranco
    Chiogna, Monica
    [J]. R JOURNAL, 2023, 15 (01): : 254 - 270
  • [38] Three-class brain tumor classification using deep dense inception residual network
    Srinath Kokkalla
    Jagadeesh Kakarla
    Isunuri B. Venkateswarlu
    Munesh Singh
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 8721 - 8729
  • [39] Three-class brain tumor classification using deep dense inception residual network
    Kokkalla, Srinath
    Kakarla, Jagadeesh
    Venkateswarlu, Isunuri B.
    Singh, Munesh
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (13) : 8721 - 8729
  • [40] Comparison of three-class classification performance metrics: a case study in breast cancer CAD
    Patel, AC
    Markey, MK
    [J]. Medical Imaging 2005: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 2005, 5749 : 581 - 589