Initial Prostate Biopsy: Development and Internal Validation of a Biopsy-specific Nomogram Based on the Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Assay

被引:110
|
作者
Hansen, Jens [1 ,2 ]
Auprich, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ahyai, Sascha A. [1 ]
de la Taille, Alexandre [3 ]
van Poppel, Hendrik [4 ]
Marberger, Michael [5 ]
Stenzl, Arnulf [6 ]
Mulders, Peter F. A. [7 ]
Huland, Hartwig [2 ]
Fisch, Margit [1 ]
Abbou, Clement-Claude [3 ]
Schalken, Jack A. [7 ]
Fradet, Yves [8 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [9 ]
Ellis, William [10 ]
Partin, Alan W. [11 ]
Pummer, Karl [12 ]
Graefen, Markus [2 ]
Haese, Alexander [2 ]
Walz, Jochen [13 ]
Briganti, Alberto [14 ]
Shariat, Shahrokh F. [15 ]
Chun, Felix K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Eppendorf, Martini Clin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Hop Henri Mondor, F-94010 Creteil, France
[4] Univ Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, Louvain, Belgium
[5] Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[6] Uniklinikum Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[8] Univ Laval, Dept Urol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[9] Urol Sci Res Fdn, Culver City, CA USA
[10] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[11] Johns Hopkins Univ Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD USA
[12] Med Univ Graz, Dept Urol, Graz, Austria
[13] Inst Paoli Calmettes Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Marseille, France
[14] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[15] Cornell Univ, Dept Urol, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Biomarker; Decision curve analysis; Nomogram; Initial prostate biopsy; Internal validation; Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer antigen 3; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; MOLECULAR URINE ASSAY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; PCA3; PREDICTION; DIAGNOSIS; RISK; MEN; MODELS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) assay in combination with established clinical risk factors improves the identification of men at risk of harboring prostate cancer (PCa) at initial biopsy (IBX). Objective: To develop and validate internally the first IBX-specific PCA3-based nomogram that allows an individual assessment of a man's risk of harboring any PCa and high-grade PCa (HGPCa). Design, setting, and participants: Clinical and biopsy data including urinary PCA3 score of 692 referred IBX men at risk of PCa were collected within two prospective multi-institutional studies. Intervention: IBX (>= 10 biopsy cores) with standard risk factor assessment including prebiopsy urinary PCA3 measurement. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: PCA3 assay cut-off thresholds were investigated. Regression coefficients of logistic risk factor analyses were used to construct specific sets of PCA3-based nomograms to predict any PCa and HGPCa at IBX. Accuracy estimates for the presence of any PCa and HGPCa were quantified using area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic analysis and compared with a clinical model. Bootstrap resamples were used for internal validation. Decision curve analyses quantified the clinical net benefit related to the novel PCA3-based IBX nomogram versus the clinical model. Results and limitations: Any PCa and HGPCa were diagnosed in 46% (n = 318) and 20% (n = 137), respectively. Age, prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, prostate volume, and PCA3 were independent predictors of PCa at IBX (all p < 0.001). The PCA3-based IBX nomograms significantly outperformed the clinical models without PCA3 (all p < 0.001). Accuracy was increased by 4.5-7.1% related to PCA3 inclusion. When applying nomogram-derived PCa probability thresholds <= 30%, only a few patients with HGPCa (<= 2%) will be missed while avoiding up to 55% of unnecessary biopsies. External validation of the PCA3-based IBX-specific nomogram is warranted. Conclusions: The internally validated PCA3-based IBX-specific nomogram outperforms a clinical prediction model without PCA3 for the prediction of any PCa, leading to the avoidance of unnecessary biopsies while missing only a few cases of HGPCa. Our findings support the concepts of a combination of novel markers with established clinical risk factors and the superiority of decision tools that are specific to a clinical scenario. (C) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 209
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CORRELATION OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY WITH OUTCOME OF PROSTATE BIOPSY
    BARE, R
    HART, L
    MCCULLOUGH, DL
    UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (02) : 191 - 196
  • [42] Could Magnetic Resonance Imaging Help to Identify the Presence of Prostate Cancer Before Initial Biopsy? The Development of Nomogram Predicting the Outcomes of Prostate Biopsy in the Chinese Population
    Dong Fang
    Chenglin Zhao
    Da Ren
    Wei Yu
    Rui Wang
    Huihui Wang
    Xuesong Li
    Wenshi Yin
    Xiaoteng Yu
    Kunlin Yang
    Pei Liu
    Gangzhi Shan
    Shuqing Li
    Qun He
    Xiaoying Wang
    Zhongcheng Xin
    Liqun Zhou
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 4284 - 4292
  • [43] Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology
    Chun, FKH
    Steuber, T
    Erbersdobler, A
    Currlin, E
    Walz, J
    Schlomm, T
    Haese, A
    Heinzer, H
    McCormack, M
    Huland, H
    Graefen, M
    Karakiewicz, PI
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) : 820 - 826
  • [44] Accuracy of a high prostate-specific antigen level for prostate cancer diagnosis upon initial biopsy in Korean men
    Shim, Hong Bang
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Park, Hyoung Kenn
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 48 (04) : 678 - 683
  • [45] COMBINATION OF PSA DENSITY, PROSTATE CANCER ANTIGEN 3 AND PI-RADS IN THE PREDICTION OF PROSTATE CANCER IN INITIAL BIOPSY
    Fazzari, Melissa J.
    Salcedo, Jose M.
    Gildersleeve, Roy T.
    Werneburg, Glenn T.
    Le Sueur, Amanda L.
    Schiff, Jeffrey T.
    Corcoran, Anthony T.
    Katz, Aaron E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E612 - E613
  • [46] Multicenter European External Validation of a Prostate Health Index-based Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer at Extended Biopsy
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Haese, Alexander
    McNicholas, Thomas
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    Buffi, Nicolo Maria
    Fossati, Nicola
    Lista, Giuliana
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Abrate, Alberto
    Mistretta, Alessandro
    Bini, Vittorio
    Redorta, Joan Palou
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (05) : 906 - 912
  • [47] Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session in the era of extended prostate sampling
    Moussa, Ayman S.
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Yu, Changhong
    Fareed, Khaled
    Kattan, Michael W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (09) : 1309 - 1314
  • [48] Indications for a second prostate biopsy in patients suspected with prostate cancer after an initial negative prostate biopsy
    Lee, Kwang Suk
    Koo, Kyo Chul
    Cho, Kang Su
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Park, Sang Un
    Lee, Suk Young
    Ko, Woo Jin
    Kim, Young Sig
    Chung, Byung Ha
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 5 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [49] The Specific Choice of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Scheme Based on Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Specific Antigen Density
    Chen, Yue
    Jiang, Xingkang
    Liu, Ranlu
    Zhang, Zhihong
    Luo, Fei
    Qi, Shiyong
    Xu, Yong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 : 6230 - 6235
  • [50] The Prostate Cancer Detection Rate on the Second Prostate Biopsy according to Prostate-Specific Antigen Trend
    Kim, Hyung-Sang
    Lee, Chang-Yong
    Lim, Dong-Hun
    Kim, Chul-Sung
    Baik, Seung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 53 (10) : 686 - 690