Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone

被引:104
|
作者
Kim, Jung-Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sogang Univ, Sch Commun, K328,35 Baekbeom Ro, Seoul 121742, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Smartphone-mediated communication (SMC); Face-to-face (FtF) interaction; Escape motivation; Relationship motivation; Perceived social support; Problematic use of smartphone; MOBILE PHONE; INTERNET USE; LONELINESS; ADDICTION; PREDICTORS; GRATIFICATIONS; ADAPTATION; ATTRIBUTES; PATTERNS; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study examines two possible routes lonely people can take to alleviate their loneliness: One route via escape motivation and smartphone-mediated communication vs. another route via relationship motivation and face-to-face interaction. Two hypothesized path models were tested with a total of 930 U.S. American participants who were nationally recruited through a professional survey company. Those with a high level of loneliness tend to rely more on smartphone-mediated communication, while being reluctant to engage in face-to-face interaction. Such combination of the two increases the possibility of developing problematic use of smartphone but decreases perceived social support from their social networks. Furthermore, a multi-group analysis suggested that young adults of age 31-40 would develop problematic use of smartphone more than adolescents of age 13-18. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 291
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Examining the quality of social support messages produced face-to-face and in computer-mediated communication: The effects of hyperpersonal communication
    Rains, Stephen A.
    Akers, Chelsie
    Pavlich, Corey A.
    Tsetsi, Eric
    Appelbaum, Michael
    COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 2019, 86 (03) : 271 - 291
  • [12] A critical exploration of face-to-face interviewing vs. computer-mediated interviewing
    Curasi, CF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2001, 43 (04): : 361 - 375
  • [13] Computer-mediated and face-to-face communication in metastatic cancer support groups
    Vilhauer, Ruvanee P.
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2014, 12 (04) : 287 - 297
  • [14] Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction
    Kim, Hye Yeong
    COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2014, 27 (01) : 26 - 43
  • [15] Emotional expression and facilitation of online vs. face-to-face breast cancer support groups
    Golant, M
    Lieberman, M
    Giese-Davis, J
    Winzelberg, A
    Ellis, W
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 13 (01) : S18 - S19
  • [16] The use of computer-mediated communication to enhance subsequent face-to-face discussions
    Dietz-Uhler, B
    Bishop-Clark, C
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 17 (03) : 269 - 283
  • [17] Interpersonal interactions and language learning: Face-to-Face vs. Computer-mediated communications
    Godev, Concepcion B.
    LFE-REVISTA DE LENGUAS PARA FINES ESPECIFICOS, 2023, 29 : 182 - 185
  • [18] Anxiety and problematic smartphone use: Does perceived social support matter?
    Hou, Xiangling
    Xi, Juzhe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 26 - 27
  • [19] A Proposed Study Examining the Effects of Social Networking Use on Face-to-Face Communication
    Serva, Mark A.
    Barineau, Michelle
    SIGMIS CPR 2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 ACM SIGMIS COMPUTER PERSONNEL RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2011, : 11 - 13
  • [20] High perceived stress and social interaction behaviour among young adults. A study based on objective measures of face-to-face and smartphone interactions
    Dissing, Agnete Skovlund
    Jorgensen, Tobias Bornakke
    Gerds, Thomas Alexander
    Rod, Naja Hulvej
    Lund, Rikke
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):