Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone

被引:104
|
作者
Kim, Jung-Hyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sogang Univ, Sch Commun, K328,35 Baekbeom Ro, Seoul 121742, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Smartphone-mediated communication (SMC); Face-to-face (FtF) interaction; Escape motivation; Relationship motivation; Perceived social support; Problematic use of smartphone; MOBILE PHONE; INTERNET USE; LONELINESS; ADDICTION; PREDICTORS; GRATIFICATIONS; ADAPTATION; ATTRIBUTES; PATTERNS; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present study examines two possible routes lonely people can take to alleviate their loneliness: One route via escape motivation and smartphone-mediated communication vs. another route via relationship motivation and face-to-face interaction. Two hypothesized path models were tested with a total of 930 U.S. American participants who were nationally recruited through a professional survey company. Those with a high level of loneliness tend to rely more on smartphone-mediated communication, while being reluctant to engage in face-to-face interaction. Such combination of the two increases the possibility of developing problematic use of smartphone but decreases perceived social support from their social networks. Furthermore, a multi-group analysis suggested that young adults of age 31-40 would develop problematic use of smartphone more than adolescents of age 13-18. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 291
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions
    Dwyer, Ryan J.
    Kushlev, Kostadin
    Dunn, Elizabeth W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 78 : 233 - 239
  • [2] Impact of social anxiety on communication skills in face-to-face vs. online contexts
    Lacombe, Corina
    Elalouf, Karine
    Collin, Charles
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 2024, 15
  • [3] Types of smartphone usage and relations with problematic smartphone behaviors: The role of content consumption vs. social smartphone use.
    Elhai, Jon D.
    Hall, Brian J.
    Levine, Jason C.
    Dvorak, Robert D.
    [J]. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE, 2017, 11 (02):
  • [4] Interpersonal Interactions and Language Learning: Face-To-Face vs. Computer-Mediated Communication
    Zhao, Hui
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [5] The effect of informal social support: Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication
    Lewandowski, Joshua
    Rosenberg, Benjamin D.
    Parks, M. Jordan
    Siegel, Jason T.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (05) : 1806 - 1814
  • [6] Amount of Time Online Is Problematic if It Displaces Face-to-Face Social Interaction and Sleep
    Twenge, Jean M.
    Joiner, Thomas E.
    Martin, Gabrielle
    Rogers, Megan L.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (04) : 456 - 457
  • [7] Mediated telemedicine vs. face-to-face medicine: efficiency in distress reduction
    Almog Idan
    Helene S. Wallach
    Moshe Almagor
    Yehezkel Waisman
    Shai Linn
    [J]. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2015, 9 : 333 - 339
  • [8] Mediated telemedicine vs. face-to-face medicine: efficiency in distress reduction
    Idan, Almog
    Wallach, Helene S.
    Almagor, Moshe
    Waisman, Yehezkel
    Linn, Shai
    [J]. JOURNAL ON MULTIMODAL USER INTERFACES, 2015, 9 (04) : 333 - 339
  • [9] Social anxiety and physiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face to face communication
    Shalom, Jonathan G.
    Israeli, Haggar
    Markovitzky, Omer
    Lipsitz, Joshua D.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 44 : 202 - 208
  • [10] Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiment
    Frohlich, N
    Oppenheimer, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 35 (03) : 389 - 403