Conducting Systematic Literature Reviews and Systematic Mapping Studies

被引:22
|
作者
Barn, Balbir [1 ]
Barat, Souvik [2 ]
Clark, Tony [3 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, London, England
[2] Tata Consultancy Serv Res, Pune, Maharashtra, India
[3] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Literature Review; Systematic Literature Review; Systematic Mapping Study; Meta Modeling; Model Based Literature Review;
D O I
10.1145/3021460.3021489
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Context: An essential part of conducting software engineering (SE) research is the ability to identify extant research on tools, technologies, concepts and methods in order to evaluate and make rational and scientific decisions. The domain from which such knowledge is extracted is typically existing research literature found in journals, conference proceedings, books and gray literature. Empirical approaches that include various systematic review (SR) methodologies such as systematic literature review (SLR) and systematic mapping study (SMS) are found to be effective in this context. They adopt rigorous planning, follow repeatable and well-defined processes, and produce unbiased and evidence-based outcomes. Despite these significant benefits, the general trend on using these systematic review (SR) methodologies is not encouraging in SE research. The primary reasons emerging are twofold - a) SR methodologies are largely cited as time-consuming activities and b) lack of guidance to conduct systematic reviews. This tutorial discusses these concerns and describes an effective way of using SR methodologies for SE research. Objectives: Attendees will be introduced to the key concepts, methods and processes for conducting systematic literature reviews (SLR) and systematic mapping studies (SMS). The benefits, limitations, guidelines for using SR methodologies in an effective manner will discussed in the session. Attendees will be guided on the appropriate formulation of a research question and sub questions; the development of a review protocol such as inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, quality criteria and classification structures; and execution of review protocol using digital libraries and syntheses of review data. A web based software tool 1, for supporting the systematic literature review process will be demonstrated and attendees will get the opportunity to use the tool to conduct the review to help in identification of relevant research and extraction and synthesis of data. Method: We will use a blend of information presentation, interactive hands-on session and knowledge sharing session. The presentation will introduce the key concepts, benefits, limitations and how to overcome the limitations; hands on session will illustrate a review process with a case study, and finally the knowledge sharing session will discuss the experiences, best practices and the lesson learnt.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 213
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic reviews of the literature: steps for preparation
    Galvao, Tais Freire
    Pereira, Mauricio Gomes
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIA E SERVICOS DE SAUDE, 2014, 23 (01): : 183 - 184
  • [42] Comparing Integrative and Systematic Literature Reviews
    Cho, Yonjoo
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2022, 21 (02) : 147 - 151
  • [43] On the need to update systematic literature reviews
    Nepomuceno, Vilmar
    Soares, Sergio
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 109 : 40 - 42
  • [44] Beyond being systematic in literature reviews in IS
    Watson, Richard T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 30 (02) : 185 - 187
  • [45] Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews
    Hartley, J
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2000, 88 (04): : 332 - 337
  • [46] Quality of reporting in oncology studies: A systematic analysis of literature reviews and prospects
    Rivoirard, Romain
    Bourmaud, Aurelie
    Oriol, Mathieu
    Tinquaut, Fabien
    Mery, Benoite
    Langrand-Escure, Julien
    Vallard, Alexis
    Fournel, Pierre
    Magne, Nicolas
    Chauvin, Franck
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 112 : 179 - 189
  • [47] Systematic reviews of the literature: methodological issues
    Koop, P
    Burgess-Pinto, E
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 12 (04) : S242 - S242
  • [48] A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies
    Alexander Schniedermann
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126 : 9829 - 9846
  • [49] A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies
    Schniedermann, Alexander
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (12) : 9829 - 9846
  • [50] Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies
    Cooper, Chris
    Booth, Andrew
    Varley-Campbell, Jo
    Britten, Nicky
    Garside, Ruth
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 18