The nature of species: A rejoinder to Zachos et al.

被引：31

作者：

Groves, Colin P. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Archaeol & Anthropol, Canberra, ACT, Australia

来源：

MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY | 2013年 / 78卷 / 01期

关键词：

Phylogenetic Species Concept; Oreotragus; Capricornis; Cervus corsicanus; Species concepts in conservation;

D O I：

10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.009

中图分类号：

Q95 [动物学];

学科分类号：

071002 ;

摘要：

I argue strongly that the Phylogenetic Species Concept offers the only way of defining species that makes them testable, as any scientific hypothesis should be. The criticisms made by Zachos et al. (in press) are not cogent, and do not offer a means of testing species proposals. Nonetheless, their comments on species concepts in conservation do provide support to the value of the Phylogenetic Species Concept. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier GmbH on behalf of Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Saugetierkunde.

引用

页码：7 / 9

页数：3

共 50 条

[31] Cryobiopsy Compared with Surgical Lung Biopsy in ILD: Reply to Maldonado et al., Froidure et al., Bendstrup et al., Agarwal et al., Richeldi et al., Rajchgot et al., and Quadrelli et al.
Romagnoli, Micaela
Colby, Thomas V.
Suehs, Carey M.
Vachier, Isabelle
Molinari, Nicolas
Bourdin, Arnaud
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 200 (07) : 944 - 946
[32] In response to Murphy et al., Lower et al., and Lan et al.
Conrad, B
CELL, 1998, 95 (01) : 16 - 16
[33] Nature over nurture(Commentary on Rolando et al.)
Sotelo, Constantino
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 31 (08) : 1339 - 1339
[34] Allowing nature to be nurture: a comment on Bailey et al.
Chenoweth, Stephen F.
Hunt, John
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 29 (01) : 16 - 17
[35] Our computational nature: comment on Barrett et al.
Klasios, John
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
[36] On taking the transformation discourse for a ride: Rejoinder to a response (Govinder et al. 2014)
Dunne, Tim
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2014, 110 (5-6)
[37] Rejoinder to Calcagno et al. (2006):: Which immigration policy for optimal coexistence?
Calcagno, Vincent
Mouquet, Nicolas
Jarne, Philippe
David, Patrice
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (08) : 909 - 911
[38] Routine psychological treatment and the Dodo verdict: a rejoinder to Clark et al. (2007)
Stiles, W. B.
Barkham, M.
Mellor-Clark, J.
Connell, J.
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2008, 38 (06) : 905 - 910
[39] Should there be a (or any) limit to IVF cycles? A rejoinder to Stewart et al. Reply
Stewart, Louise Maree
Holman, C. D'Arcy J.
Hart, Roger
Finn, Judith
Mai, Qun
Preen, David B.
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (06) : E168 - E168
[40] Cognitive Workload ≠ Crash Risk: Rejoinder to Study by Strayer et al. (2015)
Shinar, David
HUMAN FACTORS, 2015, 57 (08) : 1328 - 1330

← 1 2 3 4 5 →