A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process

被引:50
|
作者
Tuerlinckx, F
Maris, E
Ratcliff, R
De Boeck, P
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03195402
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Four methods for the simulation of the Wiener process with constant drift and variance are described. These four methods are (1) approximating the diffusion process by a random walk with very small time steps; (2) drawing directly from the joint density of responses and reaction time by means of a (possibly) repeated application of a rejection algorithm; (3) using a discrete approximation to the stochastic differential equation describing the diffusion process; and (4) a probability integral transform method approximating the inverse of the cumulative distribution function of the diffusion process. The four methods for simulating response probabilities and response times are compared on two criteria: simulation speed and accuracy of the simulation, It is concluded that the rejection-based and probability integral transform method perform best on both criteria, and that the stochastic differential approximation is worst. An important drawback of the rejection method is that it is applicable only to the Wiener process, whereas the probability integral transform method is more general.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 456
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Invasive circulation monitoring - Four methods in comparison
    Stubbe, Henning
    Schmidt, Christoph
    Hinder, Frank
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2006, 41 (09): : 550 - 554
  • [32] Comparison of four methods for identifying Streptococcus pneumoniae
    Chandler, LJ
    Reisner, BS
    Woods, GL
    Jafri, AK
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2000, 37 (04) : 285 - 287
  • [33] Comparison of four methods for transionospheric scintillation evaluation
    Strangeways, Hal J.
    Zernov, Nikolay N.
    Gherm, Vadim E.
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2014, 49 (10) : 899 - 909
  • [34] Comparison of four methods for sperm preparation for IUI
    Ren, SS
    Sun, GH
    Ku, CH
    Chen, DC
    Wu, GJ
    ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 2004, 50 (03): : 139 - 143
  • [35] Comparison of four methods of presentation of breast specimens
    PA Thompson
    Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [36] A comparison of four methods of herbage mass estimation
    O'Donovan, M
    Dillon, P
    Rath, M
    Stakelum, G
    IRISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2002, 41 (01) : 17 - 27
  • [37] A comparison of four different block bootstrap methods
    Radovanov, Boris
    Marcikic, Aleksandra
    CROATIAN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2014, 5 (02) : 189 - 202
  • [38] Defining Suburbs: An Evaluation and Comparison of Four Methods
    Terbeck, Fabian J.
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 2020, 72 (04): : 586 - 597
  • [39] A comparison of four common atmospheric correction methods
    Mahiny, Abdolrassoul S.
    Turner, Brian J.
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 73 (04): : 361 - 368
  • [40] Comparison of four surgical methods for eyebrow reconstruction
    Omranifard, Mahmood
    Koushki, A. Mehrabi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 40 (02) : 147 - 152