A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process

被引:50
|
作者
Tuerlinckx, F
Maris, E
Ratcliff, R
De Boeck, P
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03195402
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Four methods for the simulation of the Wiener process with constant drift and variance are described. These four methods are (1) approximating the diffusion process by a random walk with very small time steps; (2) drawing directly from the joint density of responses and reaction time by means of a (possibly) repeated application of a rejection algorithm; (3) using a discrete approximation to the stochastic differential equation describing the diffusion process; and (4) a probability integral transform method approximating the inverse of the cumulative distribution function of the diffusion process. The four methods for simulating response probabilities and response times are compared on two criteria: simulation speed and accuracy of the simulation, It is concluded that the rejection-based and probability integral transform method perform best on both criteria, and that the stochastic differential approximation is worst. An important drawback of the rejection method is that it is applicable only to the Wiener process, whereas the probability integral transform method is more general.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 456
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process
    Francis Tuerlinckx
    Eric Maris
    Roger Ratcliff
    Paul De Boeck
    Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 2001, 33 : 443 - 456
  • [2] Comparison of Four Electrical Measurement Methods with Bulk Diffusion for Assessing the Chloride Resistance of Concretes
    Amirreza Pilvar
    Ali Akbar Ramezanianpour
    Hossein Rajaie
    Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2016, 40 : 327 - 336
  • [3] Comparison of Four Electrical Measurement Methods with Bulk Diffusion for Assessing the Chloride Resistance of Concretes
    Pilvar, Amirreza
    Ramezanianpour, Ali Akbar
    Rajaie, Hossein
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2016, 40 (04) : 327 - 336
  • [4] Simulating comparison of four ammonium phosphate slurry evaporator systems
    Liu, Jun
    Zhong, Benhe
    Zhang, Yunxiang
    Huaxue Gongcheng/Chemical Engineering, 2000, 28 (03): : 28 - 32
  • [5] Boundary Recognition by Simulating a Diffusion Process in Wireless Sensor Networks
    Gu, De
    Wang, Jishuai
    Li, Ji
    ABSTRACT AND APPLIED ANALYSIS, 2014,
  • [7] Comparison of four methods that measure hydroxyproline
    Bruce, H. L.
    Chan, A.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 : 366 - 366
  • [8] COMPARISON OF FOUR METHODS FOR DETERMINATION OF DOXORUBICIN
    Hoai Viet Nguyen
    Nedecky, Branislav Ruttkay
    Dostalova, Simona
    Kominkova, Marketa
    Jarosova, Adela
    Docekalova, Michaela
    Stiborova, Marie
    Eckschlager, Tomas
    Adam, Vojtech
    Kizek, Rene
    CECE 2015: 12TH INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY MEETING ON BIOANALYSIS, 2015, : 160 - 163
  • [9] A comparison of four methods of inverse prediction
    Watters, Christine G.
    LaMotte, Lynn R.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 49 (03) : 709 - 716
  • [10] A comparison of four EOG correction methods
    Croft, RJ
    Chandler, JS
    Barry, RJ
    Cooper, NR
    Clarke, AR
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 55 : 15 - 15