New TFN Based Method for Evaluating Quality and Reusability of Learning Objects

被引：0
|
作者：
Kurilovas, Eugenijus [1 ,2 ]
Serikoviene, Silvija [1 ]
机构：
[1] Vilnius State Univ, Inst Math & Informat, LT-08663 Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源：
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION | 2012年 / 28卷 / 06期
关键词：
triangular fuzzy numbers; learning objects; quality; expert evaluation; reusability; multiple criteria decision analysis;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
The aim of the paper is to present a new TFN (Triangular Fuzzy Numbers) based method for the expert evaluation of the quality and reusability of learning objects (LOs). This novel method consists of the consecutive application of Fuzzy numbers theory to establish the ratings (values) of the LO quality criteria, a new TFN based method to establish the weights of the LO quality criteria, and MCEQLS (Multiple Criteria Evaluation of the Learning Software) approach to create the LOs quality model and obtain the final evaluation results. Several practical examples of LOs alternatives have been practically evaluated against the proposed method. Research results have shown that the proposed TFN based method is quite objective, exact and easy to use while selecting qualitative reusable LOs alternatives in the market.
引用
收藏
页码：1288 / 1293
页数：6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] NEW MCEQLS TFN METHOD FOR EVALUATING QUALITY AND REUSABILITY OF LEARNING OBJECTS
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Serikoviene, Silvija
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (04) : 706 - 723
  • [2] Methodology for Evaluating Quality and Reusability of Learning Objects
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Bireniene, Virginija
    Serikoviene, Silvija
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING, 2011, 9 (01): : 39 - 51
  • [3] Evaluating 5/99 content for reusability as learning objects
    Currier, Sarah
    Campbell, Lorna M.
    [J]. VINE, 2005, 35 (1-2): : 85 - 96
  • [4] Expert centred vs learner centred approach for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Serikoviene, Silvija
    Vuorikari, Riina
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 30 : 526 - 534
  • [5] Learning objects design: What do educators think about the quality and reusability of learning objects?
    Boskic, N
    [J]. 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 306 - 307
  • [6] An approach to the quality and reusability of metadata specifications for e-learning objects
    Plodzien, Jacek
    Stemposz, Ewa
    Stasiecka, Alina
    [J]. ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2006, 30 (03) : 238 - 251
  • [7] Learning Objects Reusability and Their Adaptation for Blended Learning
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    [J]. ICNS: 2009 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING AND SERVICES, 2009, : 542 - 547
  • [8] Personalised reusability metric for learning objects
    Soo, Lian Kei
    Yeoh, Eng-Thiam
    Ho, Sin-Ban
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 9 (04) : 356 - 373
  • [9] Learning objects, repositories, sharing and reusability
    Koppi, Tony
    Bogle, Lisa
    Bogle, Mike
    [J]. OPEN LEARNING, 2005, 20 (01): : 83 - 91
  • [10] A Framework for Learning Objects Reusability within Learning Activities
    Sampson, Demetrios G.
    Papanikou, Christina
    [J]. ICALT: 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2009, : 32 - +
12345