Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test

被引:40
|
作者
Brusini, P
Salvetat, ML
Zeppieri, M
Parisi, L
机构
[1] Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Udine, Dept Ophthalmol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
关键词
frequency doubling technology; Humphrey Matrix; standard automated perimetry; primary open-angle glaucoma; ocular hypertension;
D O I
10.1097/00061198-200604000-00001
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test in detecting functional glaucomatous damage. Patients and Methods: One eye in each of 60 healthy individuals, 108 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 150 patients with preperimetric (48) or perimetric (102) high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were considered. Visual fields were assessed by the standard automated perimetry (SAP) Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2, frequency doubling technology (FDT) N-30, and Humphrey Matrix 30-2 tests. Significantly abnormal points in the pattern deviation probability plot, testing time, sensitivity, specificity, and area tinder the receiver operating characteristic curve of the FDT tests were evaluated. Results: FDT revealed a significantly greater percentage of depressed points than did SAP in OHT and preperimetric POAG eyes. The FDT-N-30 test showed a significantly greater percentage of areas with P < 5% in the OHT, preperimetric POAG, and early POAG groups. The Matrix-30-2 test provided an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve slightly lower than the FDT-N-30 test in the preperimetric POAG group, and significantly greater in the perimetric POAG group. Conclusions: FDT perimetry appeared more sensitive than SAP in detecting early glaucomatous VF loss. The FDT-N-30 test showed a slightly higher ability to detect early glaucomatous damage in patients at risk for the development of glaucoma, whereas the Matrix-30-2 test provided a more detailed characterization of the glaucomatous VF loss pattern, although it required 30% more time.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 83
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of glaucomatous visual loss by frequency doubling perimetry against Humphrey 30-2 reference standards
    Arango, S
    Trigo, Y
    Sponsel, WE
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 2638 - 2638
  • [2] Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry
    Casson, R
    James, B
    Rubinstein, A
    Ali, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 85 (03) : 360 - 362
  • [3] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HUMPHREY AUTOMATED PERIMETRY STRATEGIES CENTRAL 30-2 THRESHOLD TEST VERSUS CENTRAL 30-2 SITA STANDARD TEST
    M.E.Gilbert-Lucido
    G.Berumen-Alatorre
    N.C.Ruiz-Quin-tero
    国际眼科杂志, 2003, (01) : 54 - 54
  • [4] Learning effect of Humphrey Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry in patients with ocular hypertension
    Centofanti, Marco
    Fogagnolo, Paolo
    Oddone, Francesco
    Orzalesi, Nicola
    Vetrugno, Michele
    Manni, Gianluca
    Rossetti, Luca
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2008, 17 (06) : 436 - 441
  • [5] Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry in glaucoma
    Fukushima, A
    Shirakashi, M
    Yaoeda, K
    Funaki, S
    Funaki, H
    Ofuchi, N
    Abe, H
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2004, 13 (02) : 114 - 119
  • [6] The influence of optical media opacities on Humphrey Matrix Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry results
    Johnson, CA
    Kent, K
    Demirel, S
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [7] The Effect of Myopic Optical Defocus on the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 Threshold Test
    Kim, Jae Hui
    Kee, Changwon
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (04) : 257 - 263
  • [8] Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy
    Spry, PGD
    Hussin, HM
    Sparrow, JM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (08) : 1031 - 1035
  • [9] Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry
    Han, Sangyoun
    Baek, Seung-Hee
    Kim, Ungsoo Samuel
    SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 32 (05) : 647 - 650
  • [10] Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children
    Kocabeyoglu, Sibel
    Uzun, Salih
    Mocan, Mehmet Cem
    Bozkurt, Banu
    Irkec, Murat
    Orhan, Mehmet
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : 576 - 579