Plasmatic catecholamines after neuraxial labour analgesia: A randomised controlled trial comparing epidural versus combined spinal-epidural

被引:1
|
作者
Santos, Shirley Andrade [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Fernandes, Hermann Dos Santos [1 ,2 ]
Nani, Fernando Souza [2 ]
Bartilotti, Andreza Gonzaga [2 ]
Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira [2 ]
Carmona, Maria Jose Carvalho [2 ]
Bliacheriene, Fernando [2 ]
Vieira, Joaquim Edson [3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, Sinai Hlth Syst, 600 Univ Ave,Room 7-405, Toronto, ON M6G 1X5, Canada
关键词
Labour analgesia; Obstetrical anaesthesia; Spinal; Epidural; Fetal distress; Catecholamines; HEART-RATE ABNORMALITIES; INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL; FETAL BRADYCARDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; FENTANYL; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101148
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) for labour analgesia has been associated with fetal bradycardia and uterine hypertonia when compared with epidural analgesia (EA), possibly due to a decrease in epinephrine levels following neuraxial anaesthesia. However, there are no recent studies comparing plasmatic catecholamines levels between those two techniques. This study aimed to compare CSE versus EA regarding pre- and post-analgesia catecholamines levels, uterine tone and fetal heart rate.Patients and methods: Randomised clinical trial with 47 labouring patients divided in two groups (CSE and EA). Primary outcome was plasmatic catecholamine measurements before and after neuraxial block. Secondary outcomes were fetal heart rate changes, uterine hypertonia, hypotension episodes, pain relief and fetal outcomes. Results: For CSE group, the median decrease of plasmatic epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 480-(+) 41] and for norepinephrine was -21 pg/mL [(-) 2507-(+) 94]. For EA group, the median decrease for epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 326-(+) 15] and for norepinephrine was -5 pg/mL [(-) 190-(+76)]. There were no differences between groups (p = 0.96 and p = 0.63 for epinephrine and norepinephrine, respectively). There were no differences for secondary outcomes.Conclusions: There was no evidence of a more significant decrease of catecholamines with CSE when compared with EA. Catecholamines decrease theory may not be valid for modern labour analgesia techniques. ⠃C 2022 Socie acute accent te acute accent franc , aise d'anesthe acute accent sie et de re acute accent animation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Upright versus recumbent position in the second stage of labour in women with combined spinal-epidural analgesia
    Golara, M
    Plaat, F
    Shennan, AH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2002, 11 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [42] Intravenous ketoprofen and epidural sufentanil analgesia in children after combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia
    Kokki, H
    Tuovinen, K
    Hendolin, H
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 43 (07) : 775 - 779
  • [43] Hypothermia after cesarean section with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia
    Valente, Alessio
    Ciano, Francesca
    Suppa, Ennia
    Draisci, Gaetano
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 17 (01) : 78 - 78
  • [44] Patient controlled analgesia with remifentanil versus epidural analgesia in labour: randomised multicentre equivalence trial
    Freeman, Liv M.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W.
    Franssen, Maureen T.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N.
    Hajenius, Petra J.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    Woiski, Mallory D.
    Porath, Martina
    van den Berg, Hans J.
    van Beek, Erik
    Borchert, Odette W. H. M.
    Schuitemaker, Nico
    Sikkema, J. Marko
    Kuipers, A. H. M.
    Logtenberg, Sabine L. M.
    van der Salm, Paulien C. M.
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Lopriore, Enrico
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    le Cessie, Saskia
    van Lith, Jan M.
    Struys, Michel M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Dahan, Albert
    Middeldorp, Johanna M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [45] Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor - Reply
    Eisenach, JC
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (03) : 870 - 870
  • [46] A randomised controlled trial comparing needle movements during combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia with and without ultrasound assistance
    Chin, A.
    Crooke, B.
    Heywood, L.
    Brijball, R.
    Pelecanos, A. M.
    Abeypala, W.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 73 (04) : 466 - 473
  • [47] COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN ADVANCED LABOR
    ABOULEISH, A
    ABOULEISH, E
    CAMANN, W
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (07): : 575 - 578
  • [48] Catheter failure rates and time course with epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor
    Groden, J.
    Gonzalez-Fiol, A.
    Aaronson, J.
    Sachs, A.
    Smiley, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2016, 26 : 4 - 7
  • [49] Perispinal analgesia for labour followed by patient-controlled infusion with bupivacaine and sufentanil:: combined spinal-epidural vs. epidural analgesia alone
    Vernis, L
    Dualé, C
    Storme, B
    Mission, JP
    Rol, B
    Schoeffler, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 (03) : 186 - 192
  • [50] Epidural abscess after combined spinal-epidural block
    Jens Schröter
    Djamba wa Djamba
    Volker Hoffmann
    Alfons Bach
    Johann Motsch
    Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 1997, 44 : 300 - 304