Plasmatic catecholamines after neuraxial labour analgesia: A randomised controlled trial comparing epidural versus combined spinal-epidural

被引:1
|
作者
Santos, Shirley Andrade [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Fernandes, Hermann Dos Santos [1 ,2 ]
Nani, Fernando Souza [2 ]
Bartilotti, Andreza Gonzaga [2 ]
Francisco, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira [2 ]
Carmona, Maria Jose Carvalho [2 ]
Bliacheriene, Fernando [2 ]
Vieira, Joaquim Edson [3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, Sinai Hlth Syst, 600 Univ Ave,Room 7-405, Toronto, ON M6G 1X5, Canada
关键词
Labour analgesia; Obstetrical anaesthesia; Spinal; Epidural; Fetal distress; Catecholamines; HEART-RATE ABNORMALITIES; INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL; FETAL BRADYCARDIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; FENTANYL; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101148
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) for labour analgesia has been associated with fetal bradycardia and uterine hypertonia when compared with epidural analgesia (EA), possibly due to a decrease in epinephrine levels following neuraxial anaesthesia. However, there are no recent studies comparing plasmatic catecholamines levels between those two techniques. This study aimed to compare CSE versus EA regarding pre- and post-analgesia catecholamines levels, uterine tone and fetal heart rate.Patients and methods: Randomised clinical trial with 47 labouring patients divided in two groups (CSE and EA). Primary outcome was plasmatic catecholamine measurements before and after neuraxial block. Secondary outcomes were fetal heart rate changes, uterine hypertonia, hypotension episodes, pain relief and fetal outcomes. Results: For CSE group, the median decrease of plasmatic epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 480-(+) 41] and for norepinephrine was -21 pg/mL [(-) 2507-(+) 94]. For EA group, the median decrease for epinephrine was 0 pg/mL [(-) 326-(+) 15] and for norepinephrine was -5 pg/mL [(-) 190-(+76)]. There were no differences between groups (p = 0.96 and p = 0.63 for epinephrine and norepinephrine, respectively). There were no differences for secondary outcomes.Conclusions: There was no evidence of a more significant decrease of catecholamines with CSE when compared with EA. Catecholamines decrease theory may not be valid for modern labour analgesia techniques. ⠃C 2022 Socie acute accent te acute accent franc , aise d'anesthe acute accent sie et de re acute accent animation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour
    Simmons, Scott W.
    Taghizadeh, Neda
    Dennis, Alicia T.
    Hughes, Damien
    Cyna, Allan M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (10):
  • [2] Complications of epidural and combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour
    Moschini, V.
    Marra, G.
    Dabrowska, D.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2006, 72 (1-2) : 47 - 58
  • [3] New epidural techniques for labour analgesia: patient-controlled epidural analgesia and combined spinal-epidural analgesia
    Paech, M
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (03): : 377 - 395
  • [4] Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural labor analgesia
    Norris, MC
    Fogel, ST
    Conway-Long, C
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (04) : 913 - 920
  • [5] Combined spinal-epidural technique for labour analgesia
    Guedj, P
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1996, 15 (07): : 1135 - 1136
  • [6] Efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia after initiation with epidural or combined spinal-epidural analgesia
    Sezer, O. A.
    Gunaydin, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2007, 16 (03) : 226 - 230
  • [7] Comparison of low dose epidural with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labour
    Dresner, M
    Freeman, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 84 (05) : 695 - 695
  • [8] Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia
    Hepner, DL
    Gaiser, RR
    Cheek, TG
    Gutsche, BB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (03): : 232 - 236
  • [9] Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia
    David L. Hepner
    Robert R. Gaiser
    Theodore G. Cheek
    Brett B. Gutsche
    Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 2000, 47 : 232 - 236
  • [10] Combined Spinal-Epidural Versus Epidural Analgesia for Labor and Delivery
    Niesen, Adam D.
    Jacob, Adam K.
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (03) : 373 - +