Disaggregating the Power Generation Sector for Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment

被引:21
|
作者
Algarin, Jorge Vendries [1 ]
Hawkins, Troy R. [3 ]
Marriott, Joe [1 ,2 ]
Matthews, H. Scott [4 ,5 ]
Khanna, Vikas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] US EPA, Off Res & Dev Natl Risk Management Res Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
disaggregation; electricity; industrial ecology; input-output analysis (IOA); input-output life cycle assessment (IO-LCA); power generation; AGGREGATION; EMISSIONS; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12207
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The electric power industry plays a critical role in the economy and the environment, and it is important to examine the economic, environmental, and policy implications of current and future power generation scenarios. However, the tools that exist to perform the life cycle assessments are either too complex or too aggregated to be useful for these types of activities. In this work, we build upon the framework of existing input-output (I-O) models by adding data about the electric power industry and disaggregating this single sector into additional sectors, each representing a specific portion of electric power industry operations. For each of these disaggregated sectors, we create a process-specific supply chain and a set of emission factors that allow calculation of the environmental effects of that sector's output. This new model allows a much better fit for scenarios requiring more specificity than is possible with the current I-O model.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 675
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficient algorithms for Life Cycle Assessment, Input-Output Analysis, and Monte-Carlo Analysis
    Glen P. Peters
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2007, 12 : 373 - 380
  • [42] Hybrid input-output table method for socioeconomic and environmental assessment of a wind power generation system
    Nagashima, Shin
    Uchiyama, Yohji
    Okajima, Keiichi
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 185 : 1067 - 1075
  • [43] Life cycle analysis of batteries using economic input-output analysis
    CobasFlores, E
    Hendrickson, CT
    Lave, LB
    McMichael, FC
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 1996, : 130 - 134
  • [44] Input-output analysis of the Chinese construction sector
    Wu, Xing
    Zhang, Zhihui
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 23 (09) : 905 - 912
  • [45] AN INPUT-OUTPUT STUDY OF THE SINGAPORE INFORMATION SECTOR
    Toh, Mun Heng
    Thangavelu, Shandre Mugan
    [J]. ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2013, 25 (02) : 233 - 244
  • [46] Decision support for sustainable development using a Canadian economic input-output life cycle assessment model
    Bjorn, A
    Deciercq-Lopez, L
    Spatari, S
    MacLean, HL
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2005, 32 (01) : 16 - 29
  • [47] Total environmental impacts of biofuels from corn stover using a hybrid life cycle assessment model combining process life cycle assessment and economic input-output life cycle assessment
    Liu, Changqi
    Huang, Yaji
    Wang, Xinye
    Tai, Yang
    Liu, Lingqin
    Liu, Hao
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 (01) : 139 - 149
  • [48] A Review on Economic Input-Output Analysis in the Environmental Assessment of Electricity Generation
    Henriques, C. Oliveira
    Sousa, S.
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (06)
  • [49] Hybrid input-output analysis for life-cycle energy consumption and carbon emissions of China's building sector
    Zhang, Xiaocun
    Wang, Fenglai
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 104 : 188 - 197
  • [50] The Importance of Service Sector in Value-Added Generation Using Input-Output Analysis
    Sauian, Mohd Sahar
    Aznan, Nik Fatimah Nik
    Azmi, Nurul Nisa' Khairol
    [J]. EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 210 : 198 - 205