Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: The Lyon R90-01 randomized trial

被引:592
|
作者
Francois, Y
Nemoz, CJ
Baulieux, J
Vignal, J
Grandjean, JP
Partensky, C
Souquet, JC
Adeleine, P
Gerard, JP
机构
[1] CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils Lyon, Dept Surg, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[2] CHU Lyon Sud, Dept Radiat Oncol, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[3] Hop Croix Rousse, Dept Surg, F-69317 Lyon, France
[4] Hop Croix Rousse, Dept Gastroenterol, F-69317 Lyon, France
[5] Hospices Civils Lyon EA643, Med Stat Lab, Lyon, France
[6] Clin St Marie Therese, Dept Surg, Bron, France
[7] Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Surg, Lyon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2396
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The optimal timing of surgery after preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer is unknown. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the role of the interval between preoperative radiotherapy and surgery. Patients and Methods: patients with rectal carcinoma accessible to rectal digital examination, staged T2 to T3, NX, M0, were randomized before radiotherapy (39 Gy in 13 fractions) into two groups: in the short interval (SI) group, surgery herd ta be performed within 2 weeks after completion of radiation therapy compared with 6 to 8 weeks in the long interval (LI) group. Between 1991 and 1995, 201 patients were enrolled onto the study. Results: A long interval between preoperative radiotherapy and surgery was associated with a significantly better clinical tumor response (53.1% in the SI group v 71.7% in the LI group, P = .007) and pathologic downstaging (10.3% in the SI group v 26% in the LI group, P = .005), At a median follow-up of 33 months, there were no differences in morbidity, local relapse, and short-term survival between the two groups. Sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 76% of cases in the LI group versus 68% in the SI group (P = 0.27). Conclusion: A long interval between preoperative irradiation and surgery provides increased tumor downstaging with no detrimental effect on toxicity and early clinical results. When sphincter preservation is questionable, a long interval may increase the chance of a successful sphincter-saving surgery. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2396 / 2402
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Preoperative radiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison between two different time intervals to surgery
    Veenhof, A. A. F. A.
    Kropman, R. H. J.
    Engel, A. F.
    Craanen, M. E.
    Meijer, S.
    Meijer, O. W. M.
    van der Peet, D. L.
    Cuesta, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 22 (05) : 507 - 513
  • [22] A phase II randomized double blind study of curcumin with preoperative capecitabine and radiation therapy followed by surgery for rectal cancer
    Chadha, Awalpreet S.
    Guha, Sushovan
    Krishnan, Sunil
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [23] The Impact of Increasing Radiation Dose and Time Interval Between Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy and Surgery on Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer
    Hall, M. D.
    Smith, D. D.
    Schultheiss, T. E.
    Wong, J. Y. C.
    Chen, Y. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : S205 - S206
  • [24] Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) versus abdomino-perineal resection (APR) in rectal cancer: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from NSABP R-04
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    Lopa, Samia H.
    Yothers, Greg
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Arora, Amit
    Atkins, James Norman
    Bahary, Nathan
    Soori, Gamini S.
    Robertson, John M.
    Eakle, Janice F.
    Marchello, Benjamin T.
    Wozniak, Timothy F.
    Wolmark, Norman
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [25] IMPROVED SPHINCTER AND RECTUM PRESERVATION IN LOW RECTAL CANCER WITH HIGH-DOSE PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY: 10 YEARS RESULT OF THE LYON R96-02 RANDOMIZED TRIAL.
    Ortholon, C.
    Gerard, J. P.
    Romestaing, P.
    Baulieux, J.
    Chaper, O.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S15 - S15
  • [26] Randomized controlled trial of 8 weeks' vs 12 weeks' interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Terzi, C.
    Bingul, M.
    Arslan, N. C.
    Ozturk, E.
    Canda, A. E.
    Isik, O.
    Yilmazlar, T.
    Obuz, F.
    Birkay Gorken, I.
    Kurt, M.
    Unlu, M.
    Ugras, N.
    Kanat, O.
    Oztop, I.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (03) : 279 - 288
  • [27] Effect of interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery on disease recurrence and survival in rectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial
    Akgun, Erhan
    Caliskan, Cemil
    Bozbiyik, Osman
    Yoldas, Tayfun
    Doganavsargil, Basak
    Ozkok, Serdar
    Kose, Timur
    Karabulut, Bulent
    Elmas, Nevra
    Ozutemiz, Omer
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (05):
  • [28] Does Time Interval Between Surgery and Radiation Therapy (RT) Influence Outcome in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)?
    Chadha, M.
    Boolbol, S. K.
    Friedmann, P.
    Boachie-Adjei, K.
    Kirstein, L.
    Harrison, L. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S160 - S161
  • [29] Improved rate of sphincter sparing surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer with 5-FU/oxaliplatin (SFU/OX) compared to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone
    Dolinsky, C. M.
    Mahmoud, N. N.
    Mick, R.
    Sun, W.
    Whittington, R. W.
    Soling, L. J.
    Haller, D. G.
    O'Dwyer, P. J.
    Fry, R. D.
    Metz, J. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03): : S281 - S281
  • [30] Initial results of a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and pathological downstaging of rectal cancer after preoperative short-course radiotherapy or long-term chemoradiotherapy, both with delayed surgery
    Latkauskas, T.
    Pauzas, H.
    Gineikiene, I.
    Janciauskiene, R.
    Juozaityte, E.
    Saladzinskas, Z.
    Tamelis, A.
    Pavalkis, D.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (03) : 294 - 298