Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Procedure for Synchronous Radical Resection of Liver Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Comparative Study

被引:43
|
作者
Hu, Ming-gen [1 ]
Ou-yang, Cai-guo [2 ]
Zhao, Guo-dong [1 ]
Xu, Da-bin [2 ]
Liu, Rong [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army, Gen Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Aerosp Ctr Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
colorectal cancer; synchronous liver metastasis; laparoscopy; laparotomy; one stage; head-to-head comparison; MULTIINSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; HEPATECTOMY; SELECTION; THERAPY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1097/SLE.0b013e31825af6b2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) along with synchronous liver metastases has been attempted and reported in multiple single series. In this study, we aimed to examine the feasibility, procedural safety, and oncological integrity of 1-stage totally laparoscopic procedure for the radical resection of liver metastatic CRC in a head-to-head comparison with the 1-stage open procedure simultaneously. Methods: The patients who underwent selective 1-stage concomitant resection of CRC and synchronous liver metastases between January 2004 and December 2008 (laparoscopy group, n = 13) were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Patients receiving open 1-stage resection (laparotomy group) were retrospectively included at the ratio of 1:1 (n = 13 out of 71), matching the laparoscopy group in sex, age, body mass index, site and stage of primary tumor, location and size of liver metastases, and adjuvant therapies. Results: All the thirteen 1-stage laparoscopic procedures were successfully completed, without conversion to open procedure or additional incision. The operative duration of laparoscopic procedure was shorter than that of open procedure (313 +/- 44 vs. 350 +/- 46 min, P < 0.05). The volume of blood loss was comparable between the 2 groups (259 +/- 111 vs. 273 +/- 95 mL, P > 0.05). Patients undergoing laparoscopic procedure resumed off-bed activities, bowel movement, and oral intake earlier than those undergoing open procedure, and also had a shorter hospitalization stay (8.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 11.2 +/- 1.8 d, P < 0.05). Only 1 clinically significant adverse event occurred in a patient who developed bile leak after the laparoscopic resection. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were comparable between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: One-stage synchronous laparoscopic resection of liver metastatic CRC is a feasible, effective, and safe modality in specifically indicated patients, both accelerating postoperative recovery and shortening hospitalization time.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 369
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparative study between the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery
    Naguib, N.
    Mekhail, P.
    Shah, P.
    Tanner, N.
    Masoud, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 144 - 144
  • [22] Trends and outcomes of simultaneous versus staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases
    Tsilimigras, Diamantis I.
    Sahara, Kota
    Hyer, J. Madison
    Diaz, Adrian
    Moris, Dimitrios
    Bagante, Fabio
    Guglielmi, Alfredo
    Ruzzenente, Andrea
    Alexandrescu, Sorin
    Poultsides, George
    Sasaki, Kazunari
    Aucejo, Federico
    Ejaz, Aslam
    Cloyd, Jordan M.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    SURGERY, 2021, 170 (01) : 160 - 166
  • [23] Comparison of laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases
    Cai, Qian
    Dong, Chao
    SURGERY, 2016, 159 (03) : 988 - 989
  • [24] Laparoscopic Versus Open Multivisceral Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes
    Yasutomo Nagasue
    Takashi Akiyoshi
    Masashi Ueno
    Yosuke Fukunaga
    Satoshi Nagayama
    Yoshiya Fujimoto
    Tsuyoshi Konishi
    Toshiya Nagasaki
    Jun Nagata
    Toshiki Mukai
    Atsushi Ikeda
    Riki Ono
    Toshiharu Yamaguchi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2013, 17 : 1299 - 1305
  • [25] Laparoscopic Versus Open Multivisceral Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes
    Nagasue, Yasutomo
    Akiyoshi, Takashi
    Ueno, Masashi
    Fukunaga, Yosuke
    Nagayama, Satoshi
    Fujimoto, Yoshiya
    Konishi, Tsuyoshi
    Nagasaki, Toshiya
    Nagata, Jun
    Mukai, Toshiki
    Ikeda, Atsushi
    Ono, Riki
    Yamaguchi, Toshiharu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2013, 17 (07) : 1299 - 1305
  • [26] Long-Term Outcomes for Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Mirza, Muhammad S.
    Longman, Robert J.
    Farrokhyar, Forough
    Sheffield, Jonathan P.
    Kennedy, Robin H.
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 18 (05): : 679 - 685
  • [27] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. A comparative study
    Arribas-Martin, Antonio
    Diaz-Pizarro-Graf, Jose Ignacio
    Munoz-Hinojosa, Jorge Demetrio
    Valdes-Castaneda, Alberto
    Cruz-Ramirez, Omar
    Bertrand, Martin Marie
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2014, 82 (03): : 274 - 281
  • [28] Laparoscopic Radical Resection versus Routine Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Chen, Yan
    Xi, Dong
    Zhang, Qiutao
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022, 2022
  • [29] Laparoscopic Hybrid NOTES Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Truong, Tuan
    Arnaoutakis, Demetri
    Awad, Ziad T.
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (01): : E5 - E7
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review
    Cheng, Yusheng
    Zhang, Lei
    Li, Huizi
    Wang, Li
    Huang, Yiming
    Wu, Lihao
    Zhang, Yingcai
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 220 : 234 - 246