The Inequality Process as a wealth maximizing process

被引:57
|
作者
Angle, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Inequal Proc Inst, Cabin John, MD 20818 USA
关键词
competition; gamma pdf; income distribution; robust loser; techno-cultural evolution; wealth maximization;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2005.11.017
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The One Parameter Inequality Process (OPIP) long predates the Saved Wealth Model (SWM) to which it is isomorphic up to the different choice of stochastic driver of wealth exchange. Both are stochastic interacting particle systems intended to model wealth and income distribution. The OPIP and other versions of the Inequality Process explain many aspects of wealth and income distribution but have gone undiscussed in econophysics. The OPIP is a jump process with a discrete 0, 1 uniform random variate driving the exchange of wealth between two particles, while the SWM, as an extension of the stochastic version of the ideal gas model, is driven by a continuous uniform random variate with support at [0.0, 1.0]. The OPIP's stationary distribution is a Levy stable distribution attracted to the Pareto pdf near the (hot) upper bound of the OPIP's parameter, omega, and attracted to the normal (Gaussian) pdf toward the (cool) lower bound of omega. A gamma pdf model approximating the OPIP's stationary distribution is heuristically derived from the solution of the OPIP. The approximation works for omega < .5, better as omega -> 0. The gamma pdf model has parameters in terms of w. The Inequality Process with Distributed Omega (IPDO) is a generalization of the OPIP. In the IPDO each particle can have a unique value of its parameter, i.e., particle i has omega(i). The meta-model of the Inequality Process implies that smaller omega is associated with higher skill level among workers. This hypothesis is confirmed in a test of the IPDO. Particle wealth gain or loss in the OPIP and IPDO is more clearly asymmetric than in the SWM (lambda not equal 0 0). Time-reversal asymmetry follows from asymmetry of gain and loss. While the IPDO scatters wealth, it also transfers wealth from particles with larger omega to those with smaller omega, particles that according to the IPDO's meta-model are more productive of wealth, nourishing wealth production. The smaller the harmonic mean of the omega(i)'s in the IPDO population of particles, the more wealth is concentrated in particles with smaller omega, the less noise and the more omega signal there is in particle wealth, and the deeper the time horizon of the process. The IPDO wealth concentration mechanism is simpler than Maxwell's Demon. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 414
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interplas serves up wealth of process technology
    Colvin, R
    Mapleston, P
    ONeill, M
    Snyder, M
    [J]. MODERN PLASTICS, 1997, 74 (01): : 98 - &
  • [42] Properties of the wealth process in a market microstructure model
    Theodosopoulos, Ted
    Yuen, Ming
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2007, 378 (02) : 443 - 452
  • [43] Wealth of information on foundations and the grant seeking process
    Camarena, Janet
    [J]. Computers in Libraries, 2000, 20 (05)
  • [44] Wealth inequality and democracy
    Sutirtha Bagchi
    Matthew J. Fagerstrom
    [J]. Public Choice, 2023, 197 : 89 - 136
  • [45] Finance and wealth inequality
    Hasan, Iftekhar
    Horvath, Roman
    Mares, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2020, 108
  • [46] Inflation and wealth inequality
    Kim, Dong-Hyeon
    Lin, Shu-Chin
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2024, 82 : 893 - 907
  • [47] Increasing inequality of wealth?
    Weicher, JC
    [J]. PUBLIC INTEREST, 1997, (126) : 15 - 25
  • [48] Wealth inequality and democracy
    Bagchi, Sutirtha
    Fagerstrom, Matthew J. J.
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2023, 197 (1-2) : 89 - 136
  • [49] Dynamics of wealth inequality
    Burda, Zdzislaw
    Wojcieszak, Pawel
    Zuchniak, Konrad
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS PHYSIQUE, 2019, 20 (04) : 349 - 363
  • [50] Global Wealth Inequality
    Zucman, Gabriel
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 11, 2019, 2019, 11 : 109 - 138