Value of a probabilistic atlas in medical image segmentation regarding non-rigid registration of abdominal CT scans

被引:1
|
作者
Park, Hyunjin [1 ]
Meyer, Charles R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Elect Elect Engn, Suwon 440746, South Korea
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Probabilistic atlas; Image analysis; Degree of freedom; ISOMAP; Segmentation; Target selection;
D O I
10.3938/jkps.61.1156
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
A probabilistic atlas provides important information to help segmentation and registration applications in medical image analysis. We construct a probabilistic atlas by picking a target geometry and mapping other training scans onto that target and then summing the results into one probabilistic atlas. By choosing an atlas space close to the desired target, we construct an atlas that represents the population well. Image registration used to map one image geometry onto another is a primary task in atlas building. One of the main parameters of registration is the choice of degrees of freedom (DOFs) of the geometric transform. Herein, we measure the effect of the registration's DOFs on the segmentation performance of the resulting probabilistic atlas. Twenty-three normal abdominal CT scans were used, and four organs (liver, spinal cord, left and right kidneys) were segmented for each scan. A well-known manifold learning method, ISOMAP, was used to find the best target space to build an atlas. In summary, segmentation performance was high for high DOF registrations regardless of the chosen target space, while segmentation performance was lowered for low DOF registrations if a target space was far from the best target space. At the 0.05 level of statistical significance, there were no significant differences at high DOF registrations while there were significant differences at low DOF registrations when choosing different targets.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1156 / 1162
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of a probabilistic atlas in medical image segmentation regarding non-rigid registration of abdominal CT scans
    Hyunjin Park
    Charles R. Meyer
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2012, 61 : 1156 - 1162
  • [2] Rigid and non-rigid medical image registration methods
    Dhawan, Atam P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 8 (2-3) : 200 - 219
  • [3] Non-Rigid Registration Segmentation Algorithm Based on Optimal Atlas Multi-Model Image
    Shi Yuexiang
    Chen Cai
    ACTA OPTICA SINICA, 2019, 39 (04)
  • [4] Non-Rigid Registration Segmentation Algorithm Based on Optimal Atlas Multi-Model Image
    Shi Y.
    Chen C.
    Guangxue Xuebao/Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39 (04):
  • [5] Evaluation of Non-Rigid Registration Parameters for Atlas-based Segmentation of CT Images of Human Cochlea
    Elfarnawany, Mai
    Alam, S. Riyahi
    Agrawal, Sumit K.
    Ladak, Hanif M.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2017: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2017, 10133
  • [6] Non-rigid registration method of the medical image based on the LBM
    Tong, Ming
    Cao, Yang
    He, Mengyue
    Zhang, Jianlong
    Tong, M. (mtong@xidian.edu.cn), 2013, Science Press (40): : 6 - 13
  • [7] Multi-modality non-rigid medical image registration
    Rogelj, Peter
    Kovacic, Stanislav
    ELEKTROTEHNISKI VESTNIK-ELECTROCHEMICAL REVIEW, 2007, 74 (05): : 309 - 314
  • [8] Evaluation of rigid and non-rigid image registration for postprocessing of PET/CT of the lung
    Steffen, I. G.
    Denecke, T.
    Luedemann, L.
    Ruf, J.
    Furth, C.
    Misch, D.
    Elgeti, F.
    Amthauer, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 : S332 - S333
  • [9] A Non-Rigid Image Registration Algorithm That Accommodates Organ Segmentation Error
    Zhang, C.
    Christensen, G. E.
    Kurtek, S.
    Srivastava, A.
    Weiss, E.
    Murphy, M. J.
    Williamson, J. F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3960 - 3960
  • [10] Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration
    Simpson, Ivor J. A.
    Schnabel, Julia A.
    Groves, Adrian R.
    Andersson, Jesper L. R.
    Woolrich, Mark W.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 59 (03) : 2438 - 2451