Laparoscopic techniques for fecal diversion

被引:53
|
作者
Ludwig, KA [1 ]
Milsom, JW [1 ]
GarciaRuiz, A [1 ]
Fazio, VW [1 ]
机构
[1] CLEVELAND CLIN FDN,DEPT COLORECTAL SURG,CLEVELAND,OH 44195
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02049469
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Although the role of laparoscopic techniques in performing major colorectal resections is unclear, laparoscopy may be well suited for fecal diversion procedures because no resection and minimal tissue dissection is required. PURPOSE: This report reviews our initial experience with laparoscopic stoma procedures to assess safety and efficacy. METHODS: Using a simple two-cannula technique, 24 such procedures (16 loop ileostomies, 6 end sigmoid colostomies, 1 transverse, and 1 sigmoid loop colostomy) were attempted. Indications for diversion were rectovaginal fistula (7), perianal sepsis (7), incontinence (4), advanced rectal or colon carcinoma (4), and complicated pelvic infection (2). There were 15 females and 9 males with a median age of 44 (range, 25-88) years. RESULTS: Median operative time was 60 (range, 20-120) minutes, and median blood loss was 50 (range, 0-150) mi. There were no intraoperative complications. One case was converted to a laparotomy because of dense adhesions. Median time to passage of both flatus and stool was one (range, 1-3) day for ileostomy patients, two (range, 2-4) days for flatus, and 3 (range, 2-6) days for stool after colostomy. Median time to discharge was 6 (range, 2-28) days and was often delayed by the primary disease process or ostomy teaching. One major postoperative complication, a pulmonary embolism, occurred eight days after operation in a patient with near obstructing, widely metastatic colon carcinoma. This patient later died of pulmonary failure. All stomas have functioned well, with no revisions required. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic fecal diversion procedures can be performed safely, simply, and effectively. Apparent advantages over standard techniques are avoidance of a laparotomy, while maintaining the ability to precisely identify and orient the pertinent bowel segment and rapid return of bowel function.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 288
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open pelvic fracture and fecal diversion
    Woods, RK
    O'Keefe, G
    Rhee, P
    Routt, MLC
    Maier, RV
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (03) : 281 - 286
  • [22] COLLAGENOUS COLITIS AND FECAL STREAM DIVERSION
    JARNEROT, G
    TYSK, C
    BOHR, J
    ERIKSSON, S
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 109 (02) : 449 - 455
  • [23] Percutaneous cystolithotomy of large urinary diversion calculi using a combination of laparoscopic and endourologic techniques
    Lam, P. N.
    Te, C. C.
    Wong, C.
    Kropp, B. P.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A19 - A19
  • [24] Asteroid diversion considerations and comparisons of diversion techniques
    Owen, J. Michael
    Miller, Paul
    Rovny, Jared
    Wasem, Joe
    Howley, Kirsten
    Herbold, Eric B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 HYPERVELOCITY IMPACT SYMPOSIUM (HVIS 2015), 2015, 103 : 466 - 474
  • [25] LAPAROSCOPIC REVERSAL OF BILIOPANCREATIC DIVERSION
    Alshurafa, H.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 52 - 52
  • [26] IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAPAROSCOPIC BILIOPANCREATIC DIVERSION
    Caballero, Y.
    Romero, R.
    Lopez-Tomassetti, E.
    Nunez, V.
    Hernandez, J. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 10 - 10
  • [27] Case Report of a Novel Technique for Fecal Diversion
    Chu, Quyen
    Briley, Tyler S.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (06) : 2797 - 2799
  • [28] AN IMPROVED MEANS OF FECAL DIVERSION - THE TREPHINE STOMA
    AKLE, CA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (02) : 262 - 262
  • [29] LOOP ILEOSTOMY IS A SAFE OPTION FOR FECAL DIVERSION
    WEXNER, SD
    TARANOW, DA
    JOHANSEN, OB
    ITZKOWITZ, F
    DANIEL, N
    NOGUERAS, JJ
    JAGELMAN, DG
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1993, 36 (04) : 349 - 354
  • [30] AN IMPROVED MEANS OF FECAL DIVERSION - THE TREPHINE STOMA
    ANDERSON, ID
    HILL, J
    VOHRA, R
    SCHOFIELD, PF
    KIFF, ES
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (10) : 1080 - 1081