Next generation terminology infrastructure to support interprofessional care planning

被引:1
|
作者
Collins, Sarah [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Klinkenberg-Ramirez, Stephanie [1 ]
Tsivkin, Kira [1 ]
Mar, Perry L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Iskhakova, Dina [1 ]
Nandigam, Hari [1 ]
Samal, Lipika [2 ,3 ]
Rocha, Roberto A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Partners HealthCare Syst, Boston, MA USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, 1620 Tremont St,Suite OBC-3-002D, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, 1620 Tremont St,Suite OBC-3-002D, Boston, MA 02120 USA
关键词
Interprofessional care planning; Care coordination; Terminology management; Information modeling; HEALTH-CARE; RECORD; UMLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbi.2017.09.007
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Objective: Develop a prototype of an interprofessional terminology and information model infrastructure that can enable care planning applications to facilitate patient-centered care, learn care plan linkages and associations, provide decision support, and enable automated, prospective analytics. Design: The study steps included a 3 step approach: (1) Process model and clinical scenario development, and (2) Requirements analysis, and (3) Development and validation of information and terminology models. Results: Components of the terminology model include: Health Concerns, Goals, Decisions, Interventions, Assessments, and Evaluations. A terminology infrastructure should: (A) Include discrete care plan concepts; (B) Include sets of profession-specific concerns, decisions, and interventions; (C) Communicate rationales, anticipatory guidance, and guidelines that inform decisions among the care team; (D) Define semantic linkages across clinical events and professions; (E) Define sets of shared patient goals and sub-goals, including patient stated goals; (F) Capture evaluation toward achievement of goals. These requirements were mapped to AHRQ Care Coordination Measures Framework. Limitations: This study used a constrained set of clinician-validated clinical scenarios. Terminology models for goals and decisions are unavailable in SNOMED CT, limiting the ability to evaluate these aspects of the proposed infrastructure. Conclusions: Defining and linking subsets of care planning concepts appears to be feasible, but also essential to model interprofessional care planning for common co-occurring conditions and chronic diseases. We recommend the creation of goal dynamics and decision concepts in SNOMED CT to further enable the necessary models. Systems with flexible terminology management infrastructure may enable intelligent decision support to identify conflicting and aligned concerns, goals, decisions, and interventions in shared care plans, ultimately decreasing documentation effort and cognitive burden for clinicians and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 34
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PLANNING FOR NEXT GENERATION OF RISK STUDIES
    FISHER, L
    JONES, FH
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1978, 4 (02) : 223 - 235
  • [42] Integrated Planning for Next Generation Networks
    Mohapatra, Sukant K.
    2009 IFIP/IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTEGRATED NETWORK MANAGEMENT - WORKSHOPS, 2009, : 205 - 210
  • [43] A Planning Checklist for Interprofessional Consultations for Women in Midwifery Care
    Phillippi, Julia C.
    Holley, Sharon L.
    Thompson, Jennifer L.
    Virostko, Kate
    Bennett, Kelly
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 64 (01) : 98 - 103
  • [44] The Next Generation of Health Care
    Gellhaus, Thomas M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (01): : 11 - 14
  • [45] COMPREHENSIVE CARE - NEXT GENERATION
    SMITH, P
    TRANSFUSION, 1992, 32 (05) : 490 - 490
  • [46] The next generation in medical care
    Cleevely, ST
    MATERIALS WORLD, 2004, 12 (02) : 2 - 2
  • [47] Advance Care Planning: An Interprofessional Approach to Resident Education
    Beck, Brenna M.
    Coda, Clare
    Gerges, Jocelyn
    Allen, John
    Agarwal, Amanda
    Mutchie, Heather L.
    Baek, Danielle
    Millstein, Leah S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 (11) : E66 - E68
  • [48] Stochastic Model Generation for Cloud Infrastructure Planning
    Sousa, Erica
    Maciel, Paulo
    Medeiros, Lais
    Lins, Fernando
    Tavares, Eduardo
    Medeiros, Erico
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2013), 2013, : 4098 - 4103
  • [49] Integrated infrastructure planning of charging and electricity generation
    Wang, Xiasen
    Jiang, Jiwan
    Zhou, Yang
    Wang, Xin
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 122
  • [50] the next-generation grid energy infrastructure of the future
    McDonald, John D.
    IEEE POWER & ENERGY MAGAZINE, 2009, 7 (02): : 26 - +